ROCKMINER - miners using GEN3 ASICMINER chips - page 13.

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: rockxie on April 09, 2014, 02:32:43 AM

Havelock said their policy is changed,and they only accept direct shares right now.
XCP is under developing,we will consider it if it really works well.
Thanks for your supporting.

Quote from: minerpumpkin on April 08, 2014, 11:21:20 AM

Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough?
Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).

Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?

Counterparty is your best choice to issue your STOCK! Counterparty have a full functionality now.

You can pay dividend by both BTC and XCP, choose whatever you like to pay.

Moreover, you can issue your shares with nearly zero cost, because it just costs you 0.5 XCP to issue any asset.

Counterparty thread on Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annxcp-counterparty-pioneering-peer-to-peer-finance-official-thread-395761
Counterparty official website: https://www.counterparty.co
Counterparty online wallet: https://counterwallet.co/
Counterpartyd(Command line client): https://github.com/PhantomPhreak/counterpartyd
Counterparty GUI client BoottleXCP: https://github.com/JahPowerBit/BoottleXCP

eastpk

member

Activity: 120

Merit: 10

WINSTARS - We are changing the face of gambling

Quote from: pigheadbig on April 11, 2014, 06:53:07 AM

Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough?
Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).

Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?
go head for the answers! thanks

They answered this question - disregarding Havelock because of high fees.

Quote from: rockxie on April 08, 2014, 04:21:29 AM

Hi,these shares are traded offline recently by shareholders.

We are talking with HAVELOCK, but the fees are too expensive I think.

pigheadbig

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough?
Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).

Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?
go head for the answers! thanks

101111

hero member

Activity: 525

Merit: 500

Quote from: rockxie on April 11, 2014, 04:40:46 AM

http://blog.rockminer.com/#!/2014/04/11/Rockminer_update_of_11_April

> BTW,our testing room has been renovated.

If that's the testing room I can't wait to see the actual mining centre!

jimmothy

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 509

Quote from: RoadStress on April 11, 2014, 05:48:41 AM

Quote from: rockxie on April 11, 2014, 04:40:46 AM

Testing boards are arrived,one BE200 on each,but we found that there were something wrong with them,some of components bought from Huaqiang North market can't work normally.We are working hard on this,more info will be given out soon.

How many chips are supposed to go on one board? I can't figure out from the pictures.

Quote

one BE200 on each

RoadStress

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1007

Quote from: rockxie on April 11, 2014, 04:40:46 AM

Testing boards are arrived,one BE200 on each,but we found that there were something wrong with them,some of components bought from Huaqiang North market can't work normally.We are working hard on this,more info will be given out soon.

How many chips are supposed to go on one board? I can't figure out from the pictures.

rockxie

sr. member

Activity: 284

Merit: 254

Testing boards are arrived,one BE200 on each,but we found that there were something wrong with them,some of components bought from Huaqiang North market can't work normally.We are working hard on this,more info will be given out soon.

http://blog.rockminer.com/#!/2014/04/11/Rockminer_update_of_11_April

Anotheranonlol

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 504

Quote from: donut on April 09, 2014, 02:35:21 PM

Please consider Mastercoin as an alternative to XCP, which appears to be alpha-quality software.

Total nonsense, Having tested both recently XCP is the clearly superior choice at this time. Mastercoin is not even at alpha stage in comparison.

elasticband

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom

Quote from: minerpumpkin on April 09, 2014, 01:56:12 PM

Quote from: elasticband on April 09, 2014, 01:47:52 PM

out of interest, the test farm, the revenue generated will be made public via mining address on pool api?

I doubt there'll be a lot of revenue. If they're doing things professionally, they'll also just stay on testnet

who mines on test net when you just build the most efficient miner on the market? set that baby to work Wink

Also a farm that requires extraction of that size will not be small potatoes

donut

sr. member

Activity: 248

Merit: 252

Please consider Mastercoin as an alternative to XCP, which appears to be alpha-quality software.

minerpumpkin

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night

Quote from: elasticband on April 09, 2014, 01:47:52 PM

out of interest, the test farm, the revenue generated will be made public via mining address on pool api?

I doubt there'll be a lot of revenue. If they're doing things professionally, they'll also just stay on testnet

elasticband

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom

out of interest, the test farm, the revenue generated will be made public via mining address on pool api?

dhenson

legendary

Activity: 994

Merit: 1000

I'm loving the frequent blog updates. Thank you!

101111

hero member

Activity: 525

Merit: 500

thanks for the update and good luck with the testing

rockxie

sr. member

Activity: 284

Merit: 254

We've got the PCBs for testing board.It will take about two days to weld them to testing boards.

http://blog.rockminer.com/#!/2014/04/09/Materials_and_pcbs_for_testing_demo_boards

rockxie

sr. member

Activity: 284

Merit: 254

Havelock said their policy is changed,and they only accept direct shares right now.
XCP is under developing,we will consider it if it really works well.
Thanks for your supporting.

Quote from: minerpumpkin on April 08, 2014, 11:21:20 AM

Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough?
Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).

Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?

freedomno1

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1090

Learning the troll avoidance button :)

Quote from: Chris_Sabian on April 08, 2014, 12:32:32 PM

Quote from: minerpumpkin on April 08, 2014, 11:21:20 AM

Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough?
Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).

Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?

Since there was only a small amount of public shares available during IPO, 1/100 PT may be a good idea.

I'll pick up a few

I will as well it doesn't hurt to diversify and I would trust rockxie to be at an advantage/invincible as well Tongue

Friedcat: Our advantage to manufacture chips at the cost price is invincible
Rockxie: Our ROCKMINER's ability to miner design, produce, sale and mining operation is invincible

Chris_Sabian

legendary

Activity: 896

Merit: 1001

Quote from: minerpumpkin on April 08, 2014, 11:21:20 AM

Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough?
Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).

Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?

Since there was only a small amount of public shares available during IPO, 1/100 PT may be a good idea.

I'll pick up a few

minerpumpkin

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night

Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough?
Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).

Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?

SyRenity

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: dexX7 on April 08, 2014, 08:56:08 AM

Quote from: SyRenity on April 08, 2014, 06:27:58 AM

You can easily register a new asset there.

How about you go ahead, collect shares and start a passthrough? Forcing anyone who holds direct shares to use XCP is not feasible.

It would be a good idea (I'm a long time XCP user and supporter), if there was not a possible conflict of interests (Spond).

Topic: ROCKMINER - miners using GEN3 ASICMINER chips - page 13. (Read 52761 times)