Topic: Rollbit.com | Crypto's Most Rewarding Casino 👑 - page 108. (Read 72499 times)

Yes, if you cooperate with whatever issue, you got the chance that it will resolve sooner, I understand that most whales do some
good research before sending their money into any casino they will be playing.

Knowing how they will take some edge and how they will enjoy the games that they will be playing.

Rollbit take good care of their business and they will solve if there's something that affecting their business.

What's one of a kind, though? Onling gambling. It's like a parallel universe with its own set of rules and residents from all walks of life. The most important aspect of online casinos is that they provide a secure and enjoyable environment for players of all experience levels. Rollbit is on top of things; you won't have to worry about KYC or withdrawals. This strengthens the casino's relationship with its customers and encourages them to return. We have an obligation to the online casinos we patronize as upstanding members of this community. Therefore, we should all give it up for Rollbit, who has been holding it down.

There are issues sometimes but if you are right on your part and casino you are gambling upon is totally legit you don't need to worry a lot as your case will be resolved at best.I am small gambler and comfortable with low level KYC and withdraw small amounts but Rollbit don't press it too much on you over these matters.

They timely manage the slot provider to get more exploited and drain funds out of their pockets but they must have an idea about how many players have exploited vulnerability but they also didn't have idea about it as they might be happy to hit high multipliers on each spin but don't know what actions can be taken against them.

I can't imagine taking your selfie on the road, that can't justify your identity so probably not a thing with Rollbit.
Whales have a separate KYC process for sure, and they have to cooperate if they really want to gamble with Rollbit. Anyway, there's an issue that Rollbit asked for a video call and I think it's already solve. See, once you cooperate with the site after being tagged as suspicious, you can assure that the site will investigate it fairly, just don't panic and cooperate.

The truth seems to me very well that Rollbit has handled that with great measure, it seems to me that it was handled in a very professional way not to say which was the provider or the slot machine, this is a guarantee that the casino is very worthy of admiration, now well I am glad that this type of bug or vulnerability has been detected in time, this avoids many problems in the near future, and above all that they have shared it on twitter because any player who has used this vulnerability and has won a considerable sum of money and If they hadn't paid for it, it would have turned into big problems.

If they are comfortable in compromising their privacy to that extent they are good to go but Rollbit don't have any such requirements asking you to upload a selfie on the road I assume so players on this platform need not to worry about it.Moreover for big whales you have to undergo more documents and on small scale you can gamble without any hastle.

Actually, for KYC problems, I don't mind if it's really needed for something that is needed, such as large withdrawals, as some cases have happened.
But for KYC asking for a video call or sending a photo of a residence, I'm a little bit disapproving, but if that's really the condition for solving the problem and being able to withdraw all the big funds or big winning funds from the gambling platform, I'll be happy to do it for the sake of being able to withdraw my funds.
But even though there are some people who are willing to do KYC by video calling or sending photos of their residence, it would be better if they didn't need KYC like that.
Because for some people who do not agree with the KYC request they feel disturbed or find it troublesome.

My nation only asks for a proof with a bill that you pay. Like lets say you have internet right? We all do, then it could be on your name as well? In that case a bill with your name on it, that shows your address is there already.

So, you take a picture of your internet bill, your name, your address, your ID number, everything will be given to the company that way with a single picture and they will not need anything else. If they want to take it further, the max they will do is a picture of your ID with the Bill side by side, that's it, nothing more. That's literally the hardest thing I have seen some companies ask, nothing more, and obviously some people don't want to, but I am okay with it tbf.

The experience in providing an ID, taking selfie and doing a video call is different from each other especially if you are like me who is a camera shy person, A person who doesn't like being on a lens and being seen. I'm just saying that for me it's an awkward moment to videocall a stranger especially if they you can't see the person who is calling you. We have our own insecurities and those insecurities sometimes doesn't show up in our provided documents. I'm talking about the face value here. I understand that casino's need to collect our identity but reaching to the point that we need to video call them for the sake of verification is too much for me personally.

I'd hate to go through a video call too.  I mean who wouldn't?  It's a hassle.  But I have never in my life experienced it in all my days of dealing with exchanges, poker sites and sports betting sites both fiat and crypto.  Maybe in my case it never really needed to go up to that point cos if an exchange or a gambling site is asking for a video call after you uploaded your passport or driver's license...  Something is up.  So you better make sure your face matches the the pic in the ID or you say good bye to your money.  :/

Well, i did really get your point which i could say that it is really that ideal if we do speak about the swiftness on how KYC should really be done rather than on manually making up that videocall individually.

As for the situation occured then i didnt able to think about money laundering possibilities but now that you had mentioned then it is likely to be on this way on which that someone who complained is the
one whose trying out to withdraw and amount which he/she do believes that he could pull off those deposits with ease without having that wagering requirement been hit up.
If thats the case then he's the one who do had commit out such mistake and not the site.

Did you read his post?  He made a deposit of 12k and made a bet of 1k which won 800 bucks and decided to withdraw the whole thing.  You being a Stake user of all people should know that it would raise a red flag for the account.  From sports betting site's point of view, it's like the site is being used as a mixer of sorts.  I mean try doing the same thing at Stake or any book for that matter and I'm pretty sure the account would be flagged too.  And if a site is not doing it as a standard security measure then I'd call the site sketchy.

Yeah not everybody got it but trust me, you didn't miss out on much. Also since you are already a rob member maybe thats the reason.
I got 100$, when you enter the code you get 10$ instant and then around 0.90$ every 8 hours in reloads until 90$ are claimed.
Obviously it was Stake's weak security that needs blaming but a company that uses stolen data is in my eyes also not the the most trustworthy. But that's just my personal opinion.

I agree with you on this one.

---

Seem like true they bought the data, but for this case not only blaming "Rollbits" as well for buying the data we must need to blame "Stake" due of their security who make the data get leaked.

Mys self "Platinum III" in stake, I just check using the search email function. Seem like my email is not getting that offer.

Not arguing that KYC is necessary mate.

Just saying the it should be done and handled in a timely manner. Obviously the guy in this situation somehow gets played with. Saying do a call and then they don't show up and don't reply is not a way to treat your customer, especially if this customer trusted you with 12k of his money.

About the stake thing, you can read about it here:

https://stakecommunity.com/topic/69379-stake-data-leaked-did-you-get-a-bonus-email-for-another-casino/#comment-1482333
https://stakecommunity.com/topic/69364-email-from-diffrente-casino-anyone-else-got-it/#comment-1482119

Every (or lets say most) platinum 1 player from stake got 10$ bonus code from rollbit , platinum 2 got 40, platinum 4 got 100 (I got that) , diamond VIP got thousands of $ in bonus code money.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/stake-and-odd-providers-limits-5409086 Betting limit provider.

Listed carefully again for the post I made, the limit is not based on the after-you bet 1. But there has some quota limit for new-account, is always like that because as you know "Sportbet" is the way to beat casino and have higher chance to win as long you're good on the bet you're made. That's why most casino limited the bet limit, especially for new account & sometimes a user who has a higher skill on sport-bet is prohibited (Just same like a BLACKJACK user). Casino is always hatted the guys who can beat them, even not in online but also in landbase. That's the reason, why most of sportbet user is rejected due multiple winning and because of that advantage player is always moving from one casino to other casino (that's the limit came from) to avoid them.
---
In-case about promotion robbit using stake information, I have no "idea". because I register in these 2 side with different email and the email I was using for Stake not getting rollbits information ? why is that ? can i get the link topic ?

---

Another think about "KYC" term & condition is always stated: They have right to ask "KYC" and that things is always referring a something they can do whatever they do (It's common things rules for any "CASINO"). I also hatted this statement, but we can't do any shit of it because we check the box at the time register.

KYC is necessary, because is triggered money laundry system (due he making a withdraw before he make 1x waggering).

You think so? At EVERY site I ever played I have decent limits from the beginning. When I started at stake I bet 4 digit amounts without any problem.
By the way, I have over 20 years experience with online gaming, back when betandwin wasn't even bwin yet. So I would say I have some experience. Also I have been limited at bwin (1euro) , bet365 (around 50euro) , expekt (25euro sharp) , Tipico (100euro) , betathome as well as stake (only at basketball) and sportbet.io. What's your experience?  

I have NEVER been limited after 1 bet like the guy with the rollbit problem, NEVER. My limits always came after a longer stretch of wins.

For example I have played on nitrogen sports in the past. From the beginning high limits, but I lost and was down quite a bit . Then I won 90% of my losses back within some weeks and instantly got limited. So even though I was still down overall I got limited, just because of s tretch of wins. Thats when I cashed out and said goodbye and everything was a waste of my time.

No legit site limits after 1 bet and no site has micro limits from the beginning.

About KYC, they have the right to ask for it. But why the Call? And why make a call appointment and then don't do it and ignore him? If the problem was not having cleared the rollover they can just tell him "hey, you still need to rollover 11k", why is KYC necessary at this point?

That's the problem here.

Also the other issue I have is what I wrote in the other thread of the guy with the issue, and I quote myself:

"Remember when all Stake.com players VIP level platinum and up got promo emails from Rollbit with bonus codes some weeks ago? The higher the level at stake the higher the bonus was. So obviously they bought the data from the stake hack a couple of months back. I used the code myself but would never even think about depositing there."

A company that uses stolen files to promote themselfes is kinda shady.

I agree with you on this. It does seem like an overreaction to impose betting limits on him after a single bet, but it's important to keep in mind that we haven't heard the other side of the story. At the moment, we've only been presented with the player's perspective, which could potentially be biased or incomplete. It's possible that the decision to impose betting limits on the player wasn't solely Rollbit's, but rather a requirement from their sportsbook provider. Without knowing all the details of the situation, it's difficult to determine who exactly is responsible for restricting the player.

Nonetheless, it's still important to gather all the facts before jumping to conclusions. Let's just wait to see what Rollbit Razer has to say about this case.

Dude, did you have experience with online-gaming?

Every new account always have a small limits on "sport-betting", not only on rollbit but also other casino go to stake and you also have the same things have a limitation waggering for sport-bet. To increase the limit, you need to waggering into the casino and then the limit will increase according to the waggering has been made on the casino or VIP level you're.

He deposit more than 12,000$ and only waggering 1,000$. Rules casino is always have some "1x waggering" from the deposit you're made to the casino (It's the system for money laundry), ask every casino and they also have the same things.

That's why, his withdraw is not being process automatically and got asked by "KYC". @yahoo is also giving a good points, even he successfully "KYC" he still need to finish waggering 1x deposit.