It's surprising how a big token which currently at 241 rank on CMC, but they only listed on one unknown centralized exchange. While Fun token which currently at 718 rank on CMC are listed on many centralized exchanges.
Is centralized exchanges have a rule to not accept gambling token? Fun token branding themselves to be "gaming" token, not necessary to be "gambling" which I think it's the reason they were accepted.
Yeah, I believe known exchanges can be finicky to gambling platform's token. Another casino I know has been doing negotiations with tier 1 exchanges e.g. bybit about their token and these CEXes are said to be finicky with gambling tokens.
Lesser known CEXes should be easier to get into though. Since popular CEX -- the tier 1's esp -- get more attention and lesser knowns tend to be laxer.
We do know that exchanges have those terms that they are prohibiting funds that came from gambling site. How about on listing gambling tokens? Is there some exemption to this one?
If it turned out that they've been getting listed into those exchangers specially on top tiers then there might be some agreement into this but its good that RLB
is really touching up these platforms on which this do significantly shows on having that recognition at least and also really a good news into those RLB holders.
It's great to see the development made by the Rollbit team, i think over time Rollbit will become much famous for many people. For now maybe there are still a few Cexes that list RLB, but i am so sure that in the future there will be more, and it is possible that RLB will enter into larger centralized exchanges such as Binance, Bybit, and others.
There's that domino effect on which at the moment that it will be getting that started on listed on even with those low tier exchange but slowly getting listed to mid then
there's that chance that it could hit up those top tier ones.