Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 12. (Read 84840 times)

interesting to put poker and chess on the same "bucket" as strategy, and I agree that both require skill but they are very different
chess always has the best move and you get good by knowing what is the best move to do at a given moment
on poker it's more about odds and bluffing could change everything (you can win without a good hand)

curious to hear your friends strategies on the roulette since this is way more luck, are the strategies related to bankroll management?

Well this is very different as a regulation to control the entire world and it is a consequence of what should never have been accepted, I am not saying anything that the casino companies are good and that they have emerged for good, but taking into consideration that the things now with the KYC they are putting them in as if it were the best, well it is something that I do not believe, of course as I have said before, I have only left KYC in casinos that are the most reliable, for example Roobet as well as stake.com, bitcasino and many more, so now how do they want to implement KYC in all casinos anyway, they say that it is to have more security to return the dfnood in case of hacking, many things like that, but before in 2017 how did they do? Only the user ID and email was enough to respond to all the possible problems that were generated.

I start from what can be achieved, for example a casino that has everything implemented and falls into a possible Hack that can have the consequence that the casino is not responsible enough that they will use their clients' funds to extract them.

And even if you have everything about the KYC, they will not respond except in time, that is what we need to see, then if things are better with the KYC, they Can still scam people , then the casino that acts badly does things like that, In my case I will always say something, when a casino wants to do things well and puts its customers first before the rules, for me it is a good casino, many times we have talked about how there should be amounts available to withdraw without doing a KYC for For example , up to $2K or $5K is Enough to withdraw as normal without KYC , but to Withdraw 100usd or less you have to do a KYC, I don't see that well, of course each casino has its policies and its Tos, which we should read very carefully before to do anything, because it is money that is being risked and knowing what we are getting into.

Aside from spending a long time for building up their reputation theirs also huge money used to make their casino more visible to people so no wonder that nowadays they are now sustainable and one of the best casino exist in the market.

And for making their business remain reputable this became an option for people since the reputation will always matter and they could decide to gamble because they know that Roobet would never let them down compared to other new casino that they don't know if they are for real or not. This is why its important for people to only choose the reputable casino which already have good track record so they can avoid any possible scams.

Building a reputation takes a long time as it takes time before people really start trusting a site and see that is reliable. Destroying a reputation can happen over night, it just need some legit cases of people that are having problems that don’t get solved in a good way. Not saying that that would happen to Roobet but maintaining is a good reputation is key.

They spent a long time to build up their business and gain good reputation. It's not easy to achieve so after achieving it, it's hard to destroy it all as a big and successful casino can get good profit from their operation.

It's better to keep their business running smoothly and transparently, fairly for their customers as it helps them to gain very sustainable income includes good profit.

A scam casino can do their scams against users with KYC or without KYC. KYC card can be a favorite tool to refuse a user withdrawal request but such business will not last long. On a trusted platform like Roobet, if you use your own documents, with good resolution, you will successfully KYCed and no doubt that your money will stuck because of failed KYC.

We don't see any big issues happened here and they rarely get accusation from their costumers so that indicate that they are fine then treat their gamblers so well so doing that KYC here should be fine as they would surely not risk their business just for short time profit. They are big business now so for sure they would try to protect what they built since this will be profitable for them in the long run. We can really suspicious to some casino especially if they are new but for other reputable casinos also with Roobet then I guess they are tested already so everything should be fine in this casino.

Although each person's goals for gambling differ, there are general rules on the basis of which the correct behavior can be determined and the limits of each approach can be understood. It can be said that there is a balance between luck and self-intelligence, whether to determine the type of sports to bet on or to choose bets.
This, of course, increases the fun in the process and increases enthusiasm in general. Enjoying gambling can only be healthy in the form we are discussing now, and any practice different from that could be classified as a disease symptom or a sign of loss of control over conscious behavior. I really hope that anyone is able to understand these concepts so that their practice can be healthy and conscious.

That's right. It's impossible to doubt and fear everything. Roobet is one of those places where you can relax and just do what they ask. They will never scam you or sell your data to any third party. Actually, you can be suspicious about many places on the net, but Roobet is not one of them.

Lots of negative possibilities that might happen if our identity has been used for any illegal activity since we might suffer the consequences of what those criminals done that's why we should protect our identity so that no unimaginable bad incidents will happen to us. To many negative stories about stolen identity and for sure we cannot take the effect especially the crime committed by those criminals is huge that we can't imagine.

That's why its always good to be aware on the risk and we should protect our identity so that we can continue to do our activities without worrying on anything that we didn't do that's why people should always put in their heads that they should never submit their KYC details anywhere especially on those platform which reputation still questionable.

But incase of Roobet I think gamblers are fine here and we don't see anyone getting any issue related on this matter.

I totally agree....and then to think that most gambling websites say "to increase the safety of your account, please fulfill the KYC" but it's quite the opposite.

You haven't experienced getting your KYC details hacked and spread across the internet which is why you have no idea how it feels. I do know how it feels since I saw a relative of mine get screwed because of his KYC details getting hacked. Think!

Modern tech has made it tougher to safeguard our privacy these days which is why so many including me worry about submitting any form of KYC anywhere these days.

I really like Roobet, best rewards and reloads around IMO!

I can also get it that people don’t want to share their personal information and sometimes KYC even asks for a proof of income which is a bridge to far in my eyes. I have no problem doing basic KYC on reputable and legit sites such as Roobet. I would avoid it on new sites that have not build any reputation yet.

I wouldn't blame them. They are just privacy conscious. Some of these platforms may not have ill intentions, but sometimes how the user data is kept could a problem. It could lead to identity theft or data leaks, which can put a user in great danger.

The chaps who value their privacy so much should completely stop using centralized services if they don't want to go through the headache because those services all eventually collect the data

I don't think so. If I make a bet and don't have time to watch the match, no problem at all. I can only bet on the final result and don't care about other things happen in the match like yellow cards, red cards, corner kicks and more, I even don't need to watch the match.

Even I want to bet and watch the match for entertainment but if I suddenly can not manage my time to watch it, it's fine, not big problem.

Watching the match is mainly for very serious and professional gambler who want to bet along with situations during the match time. I am not that kind of gambler.

Skills, luck are important in sports betting as we can not control what players will show on field, decisions of referee and other factors. Luck is important but experience and skills to look at odds and make our bet or just stay away, will reduce risk to lose bets.

When we watch football games, those opportunities that other teams have to score a goal and they are constant opportunities, they are not a good indicator that the team that is putting a lot of pressure on the other team will win, you can test it yourself by placing a bet during the game and you will see that you will hardly be able to find a decent odds to place a bet, you will hardly be able to find a decent market, because during the live game you may think that as one of the teams is putting a lot of pressure on the other team's defense then this means that the other team will be able to score a lot of goals and bookmakers will place low odds on over goals markets

and if you want to place a bet on the under goal market then you would be taking a big risk because more goals could come in, so it would not be a good choice to bet on the goals market. in the corners market it will also be more complicated to bet during the game, also while the person is watching the game it is difficult to pay attention to the game and analyze the game at the same time, which is why in my opinion it will be better to place a bet before the game but after announcing the squad that will play, because one of the biggest mistakes people make is placing a bet without first checking and confirming which squad will play, the person looks at the greatness of the team's name and then decides to place a bet

For example, a case in which inter plays against lecce, the person looks at inter, knows that inter is a big team while lecce is a small team, so the person will soon bet on inter to win because they are starting from the beginning that inter is a big team and lecce is a small one, but on the day of the game inter could field lower quality players and thus lecce win the game, this is one of the biggest disadvantages of people betting without first seeing the squad initial match, while if it were a live game in which the person was watching, they would know that Inter would be playing with a lower squad, but the odds would be low if Lecce won

For me, Sportsbetting is the best skill+luck based gambling game. In order to have complete enjoyment, it is better for choices and decisions not to be governed by emotion, and for this reason it is always recommended not to bet on favorite teams or players because this can lead to many fallacies. Sports betting may share an intelligence-skill quality with card games like poker or blackjack, but the excitement aspect is much greater with sports games.

In the extreme case, playing sports bets governed by emotion is much better than online games that can be controlled by gaming service providers regardless of the expectations and positions of the gamblers themselves.
I would like to emphasize that the House is not responsible for the choices, no matter how illogical they may seem. It merely displays all the games, leaving room for the gambler to choose.

Well you should not bet if you can't watch the game you are betting on since you will just get easily affected once the result will show not in favor to you. But if you are into fun factor and just add up some bet just to make all things exciting while watching then I guess this is really a good option since it could spice up the speculating experience since there's a bet at risk. Also once you and your friends are their watching together this negative feeling will be eliminated and for sure the fun factor will be there then they might forget about discouraging feeling on the losses they get. If they really want to win and want to avoid those inaccurate betting decision then they must research first before placing so that they could see on which of them have better chance to win.

It has pros and cons.

When you bet on a match you are watching/ following, you are likely enjoying the match and every situation in the match. In entertainment aspect, it is good for you to have fun and refresh your mind.

But it is not only good, if you are a type of person who can be affected by emotion, you will make more extra bet during the match. By emotionally bet more, you are taking more risk with more emotional bets. It will potentially lead you to more inaccurate bet decisions.

I do not think it is a risky strategy as much as relying solely on the forum to launch promotional campaigns. In general, not all social media platforms deal with advertisers from the gambling industry. If this were possible on Facebook or TikTok, all these casinos would have benefited from it. The algorithms of these sites are able to achieve good results.


Like you, I prefer this strategy because I enjoy following the matches I bet on. Perhaps this is the healthiest thing about gambling, meaning that gambling games remain linked only to sports matches. All other forms lead to disastrous results in cases of addiction. Gambling companies are not subject to any restrictions in game designs. Personally, I consider slot games and all online games to be a real waste of time, and I am surprised by this great demand for them.