It's better to keep their business running smoothly and transparently, fairly for their customers as it helps them to gain very sustainable income includes good profit.
A scam casino can do their scams against users with KYC or without KYC. KYC card can be a favorite tool to refuse a user withdrawal request but such business will not last long. On a trusted platform like Roobet, if you use your own documents, with good resolution, you will successfully KYCed and no doubt that your money will stuck because of failed KYC.
Aside from spending a long time for building up their reputation theirs also huge money used to make their casino more visible to people so no wonder that nowadays they are now sustainable and one of the best casino exist in the market.
And for making their business remain reputable this became an option for people since the reputation will always matter and they could decide to gamble because they know that Roobet would never let them down compared to other new casino that they don't know if they are for real or not. This is why its important for people to only choose the reputable casino which already have good track record so they can avoid any possible scams.
Well this is very different as a regulation to control the entire world and it is a consequence of what should never have been accepted, I am not saying anything that the casino companies are good and that they have emerged for good, but taking into consideration that the things now with the KYC they are putting them in as if it were the best, well it is something that I do not believe, of course as I have said before, I have only left KYC in casinos that are the most reliable, for example Roobet as well as stake.com, bitcasino and many more, so now how do they want to implement KYC in all casinos anyway, they say that it is to have more security to return the dfnood in case of hacking, many things like that, but before in 2017 how did they do? Only the user ID and email was enough to respond to all the possible problems that were generated.
I start from what can be achieved, for example a casino that has everything implemented and falls into a possible Hack that can have the consequence that the casino is not responsible enough that they will use their clients' funds to extract them.
And even if you have everything about the KYC, they will not respond except in time, that is what we need to see, then if things are better with the KYC, they Can still scam people , then the casino that acts badly does things like that, In my case I will always say something, when a casino wants to do things well and puts its customers first before the rules, for me it is a good casino, many times we have talked about how there should be amounts available to withdraw without doing a KYC for For example , up to $2K or $5K is Enough to withdraw as normal without KYC , but to Withdraw 100usd or less you have to do a KYC, I don't see that well, of course each casino has its policies and its Tos, which we should read very carefully before to do anything, because it is money that is being risked and knowing what we are getting into.