Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 154. (Read 84563 times)

I didn't know this even though I have been playing at Stake for a long time now. Shit like this sucks big-time for the players, but the silver lining is that there are still plenty of great legit alternatives that don't require KYC for deposits and withdrawals.

Exactly. This would show that they actually care about their players and improve their popularity in the long-term.

@babygun Glad that the casino that accepted Monero as payment has been listed for you but I want to know that this casino (Roobet) is a company and the crypto they supported will depend on their crypto payment processor company.
@rhomelmabini that's the issue with casinos that accept Monero as payment and it is better to operate with crypto that will prevent a future issue than support it. Every casino has different rules set up by their Master License holder though.

This is definitely something I can support, as it is an appropriate way to introduce KYC requirements. Having new players sign up for the gambling platform and then require KYC verification before withdrawing money will certainly not make the platform popular in the mainstream and might even hamper some users. The least they could do was give a grace period to process the KYC if they want or to refund the money of players who do not meet the KYC requirements within the validity period. That would have been reasonable.

Including https://crypto.games/ on the list!

Monero is been commonly included on payment/deposit options on some popular casino nowadays.Even ETH and TRX sounds already been a default thing
on most casino nowadays or become standard.Gamblers does really love to see several coins been added up on the option list so that if ever they would tend
on making use of their alts and do able to look that its available on the site that they are playing then it would really be a big convenience.

Betcoin, Fairspin, BC.Game and I think there still a lot of top casinos that accepts it. Perhaps the issue of these casinos is that it pose a threat that they may not know who they are interacting with or whoever plays on their platform considering the high level of privacy of Monero. I think it may take time to add them but for sure Roobet will find a way for that.

All the casino sites that I have visited in the casino world, Roobet is one of the best in the casino digital world. But the only issue I had when I visited the site was the delay loading of the site. It loaded for about 15  - 30 minutes before it open. I really do not know what caused the delayed. If it was from end service (network) or from the traffic caused by the users in the site and when I finally opened the site, I really love the atmosphere of the site, I admire the features of the site. There are some games that I saw there, I have not seen in my entire life before. There are a lot of games that one can play to pass time and have fun. The site is just like tourist site which has attractive features.

Anyone that is registering and using the site should use his or her correct information to avoid ban and freezing of account. Make sure you do your KYC correctly.

To be honest, I don't know any topcasino that has Monero as a crypto to deposit/withdraw. Talking about coins, one thing that Roobet is lagging behind in, is the integration of new coins. They don't need to add 20-25 more coins but coins as BNB, TRX, USDT should be a nice addition in my eyes.

There are some casino that has already integrated Monero as a payment method before the compliance risk which led to the delisting of Monero on some tier 1 exchanges and the integration of Monero can still happen in some casinos. However, it's going to be 1 out of 10 casinos because of any form of anonymous deposit or withdrawal against casino Master license holder rules and regulations.

If that is a reality, of course, I know that there are many people who always seek to take care of their data and be the most anonymous so that no one knows anything about them, in fact on many occasions I have been in some threads where they talk about how would be the impact if Monero enters a casino? what would that acceptance be like and what would become of the other casinos seeing that they have an almost entirely anonymous currency, it is well known that Bitcoin is more universal and in all people what is heard most for the first time is Bitcoin, and then What is read or something is that altcoins and their functions are known, then this would be a great different option.

Well the truth is that this is something that many people avoid, first of all KYC, and when talking about various levels of KYC it is much more panic, this is something that has been going on for a long time, but because the current requirements are very strong, the casino is almost not to blame, it must comply with the laws that carry out this procedure implies, I know that the casino risks losing many customers, but that is preferable to having to wait and have the casino closed totlam,nte that is something much worse, I know that we as players hate KYC, but somehow things are done better by following these rules.

Even loyal or long time players too will surely be having doubts on complying those verification specially on level 2..Level 1 might really be that considerable and still not enough for people not to stay away
but if they would really be turning out to be that strict when it comes to compliance then pretty much sure it would heavily affect the numbers that would be playing on their site.
We cant tell though or make out some conclusions yet but its true  that they do make out sudden decisions without making any announcement which they should at least do know the community
on whats up their plans whether they would be integrating these things or not.

Level 2 means providing other documents like Valid ID right? I think many will start to panic again once they asked for this KYC though of course this can still happen since Roobet requirement is quiet unpredictable and they made no announcements before making any changes. If that will be required, I also doubt that I can provide such documents, this can be a big problem to some gamblers too.

You can't guarantee that for the future. I mean they may or may not ask that, we didn't know they would ask the current one neither, and even though the kyc level 1 is not asking for many things, they are still asking for some stuff and you have to be legit about it. On the other hand, we are talking about a situation where we need to realize that it hurts roobet, so why would they ask it right?

Well, it would not be a smart decision by roobet to make mandatory kyc where you show your ID and face and everything else. Hence I think it will "probably" not happen but just like I said first, we really do not know what is going to be happening and what is going to surprise us.

@Slow death,

Are only 30 days enough?

Personally, I don't really like sharing KYC documents. A few days ago I noticed that STAKE does not allow any gambler to deposit on their website without completing KYC (both existing users and newcomers). Although there are restrictions on deposits, the site has no withdrawal restrictions. Users can gamble without KYC and they can make withdrawals too, but only deposits are terminated.

I think this system should be followed by all the casinos then the gamblers will be spared unnecessary hassles and the reputation of the casino will remain intact.

As you mentioned, we both would prefer a legal casino that doesn't enforce mandatory KYC which is why I agree to simply disagree on this matter.

Good points. The biggest issue with how they enforced mandatory KYC level-1 is that they never informed their gamblers in advance about it which stunned many of them since it was completely unexpected.

That's the problem with people who come here and complain, we should stop with that already. We should be able to delete ALL complaints on casino topics because if we keep on focusing on those then we are not going to end up with anything good at all, it is not going to be good. Because, we are talking about something that is constantly here and never gets removed even when solved, and that's not going to be a good thing.

This is why I believe that we should be removing them here, put them on scam accusations, if they are good then they are good, if not then they are not bothering people here and complaining about stuff that are already resolved.

I keep asking myself:

I believe that there must be many people who are using the casino to make large deposits like more than 10K and manage to lose all that money, but let's suppose there are many people with more than 1000$ in the casino, these people keep making plans to go later withdraw their money, when they arrive at the casino they are faced with KYC, even though it is level 1 KYC it is still KYC, and these people are afraid to reveal their identity on the internet so they will be forced to lose their money.

so I ask myself:

what does it cost casio to put KYC but give 30 days for all people who don't like and don't want to comply with KYC to withdraw their money and close their account?

That measure would be the fairest! now when the casino doesn't do that then it is creating an unpleasant and unfair situation and it can be understood as a way to withhold people's funds


It is true that casinos have the right to ask for KYC because they are respecting the laws, I also did KYC, what I just think should be done was to be sincere and honest with people and say:

Look, in this casino do not create an account if you do not want to comply with KYC and before any customer makes a deposit they could ask for KYC and if they also want to change something in the TOS to make everyone comply with KYC level 2 they could inform everyone in advance and give people 30 days to withdraw their money and close their accounts. It doesn't cost anything to have common sense and do this!

As per the current gambling policies many casinos have accepted the AML guidelines and introduced KYC for the players and in future the government regulations could become more strict putting pressure on the casino owners to implement these norms but these are assumptions at this time so will see how they operate in future.

Losing a customer is expected when rules like KYC is implemented. It's the drawback to the casino but they need to comply since they are forced to do to maintain the legality of the casino. I understand the reasoning of KYC and I know casinos won't like to do it if they aren't required since it cost additional resources and manpower to maintain it. Though let's hope more and more casino who are planning to have KYC give their customer a chance to withdraw first before they implement the rule. Suddenly requiring and forcing their gamblers to submit KYC will give them bad reputation for sure.

There’s no doubt about the promotions of Roobet, they really know how to attract players to try their site and it’s very attractive. Well, some are just complaining about KYC implementation without announcement before, well this has been the issue and I’m still confuse why many can’t still move on about the KYC implementation of Roobet.

Roobet is very active, and they are just asking for a level 1 KYC, which is general information needed for you to withdraw some money. What I also like about Roobet is that, they are very active and even if they are already considered as one of the good site, they still continue to host many promotions here in the forum and also in social media. If many don’t want the level 1 KYC, you can just skip Roobet but I’m telling you, you will miss a lot especially with a great promotions and great games as well.