I really like that integration in the event that it happens, because not everyone will do it, perhaps for fear that they might give them even more follow-up? I'm not very sure, but the SEC may be able to get in there, I think that the current KYC requirements that are so demanding, both for casinos and exchanges, is for that same action, to be able to do follow-ups, so they don't use Monero, because I've seen As an exchange as prestigious as Binance, they have surrendered to the is of many governments and authorities of some countries and have blocked many users of the exchange, including the blocking of some user funds that those governments considered suspicious, this is good for users. which are bad actually, but Monero makes the transactions more private, more anonymous, I think that would make it more difficult for the authorities to trace them. I think that may be a compelling reason today.
When governments come for a person, there are millions that use it, but when those millions are stuck in one place then government could bottleneck that place and could check it anyway they want.
Just think about the Binance example you are giving, if they didn't do KYC then they would not be able to do exchanging anywhere in the west, because they all want that, and I personally would prefer it if they just operated here and give KYC, but the difference between Binance and a casino is that we are talking about something that is gambling vs trading. One of them is legal and the other is not so legal in other places which is the trouble.