Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 155. (Read 84563 times)

Yes, I understand what you are saying, I don't know how there are those types of people who can make good things look bad, what happens is that there are people who have different types of culautras, there are some who always want to take advantage of everything and invent anything to be able to have a profit at any rate, and this fun is not very clear to them, the people who dedicate themselves to looking for the 5 legs of the cat do not see the effort that a casino makes to guarantee the money that is deposited is safe, and that the money that each person risks playing becomes a total fun these things are what make a good casino.


It is that all the practices that have to do with KYC every casino knows that its genet will not like it, and Roobet for now has a good success, I know many friends who have roobet as one of the casinos that they frequent the most after SB, stake.com, they tell me that their slots are also very good and have an RTP that seems normal and good to them, or it is neither very high nor very low, so all these things attract people who like them a lot, besides, Roobet has a lot of relevance Today compared to other casinos, most do not invest much in their marketing, instead Robbet has an open signature campaign, they have art contests, all these things claim the success of the platform, so the KYC that players request Well, they do it and that's it.

I doubt that they will announce anything beforehand. They didn't do it last time, when they introduced mandatory KYC Level 1, which caught many players off guard. Not exactly the best business practice, if you ask me but I guess they had their reasons.

I am talking about the possibility, and I think it is reasonable to think that the day will come when every legal online Casino will require its player to undergo KYC.  With the current trend of Online Casinos today, asking for KYC when they actually started out not asking it for their players. And, I could have ask you the same question but then, let's just agree to disagree. At the end of the day, we both prefer a legal Casino that does not implement mandatory KYC to their users.

Whenever someone talks about "enough with KYC talk" that always scares me. That means you accept the decision and want to move on and thats not how you show your discontent with the situation at hand. I dislike the fact, and I keep on warning Roobet to not go along with this for a long time. I mean if they ask for more and more in the future, we should be here to stop that from happening. If we all rolled over and accepted level 1, then they would have asked for level 2, but many people left and many stayed but complained, so maybe that is the reason level 2 is not mandatory, maybe its not, but you never know. Hence, complaining about part of Roobet is not a trouble if you ask me, it should be done constantly to keep them in check.

Yes its not really that necessary on making up discussion in related with KYC because if ever they would intend to add up further verification then pretty sure they would make out some announcement
and if not then users or gamblers would eventually find it and tell it to the public in related to this and this is where things would be changing when it comes to impression.
I agree on what Juggy777 had said that it would be better that we should stop on discussing about KYC but rather focused on the other topic in correlation with promotions and other related
stuffs which would be that much more relevant.

How are you so sure that every single crypto gambling site out there will make KYC mandatory like Roobet? Can you foresee the future or something? You clearly can't which is why you are simply assuming.

It's because someone mentioned that Roobet would make Level-2 verification mandatory soon sparking another KYC related debate.

I dont think Roobet will ask for another level verification (and that is submitting documents for level 2) aside from the mandatory level 1 kyc. Unless if your account is suspicious or you exceeds the limit that need an additional identity verification. But if we're just an average gamblers, I dont think they will ask us for further verification. But as you have said gamblers who are not comfortable in kyc thing can always switch to other casino that dont require kyc. We have an option.

I am bit baffled as to why are we discussing KYC again and again in Roobet thread, because I remember few user’s too had posted this before that we move on from KYC discussion and just accept it as it is. Furthermore moving forward let’s try and discuss about Roobet quest, or their sportsbook odd to see if they’re providing higher or lower odds in comparison to their peers.

On the time that they would be asking for some documents for the verification then this is where their revenue would took a bad hit considering that majority of players or even loyal ones would be staying away from

Roobet and since there are lots of options that we do have in the market then there's no doubt that they would really be jumping off into another place.Lets hope that they wont really be going into
that point which would surely be not a good sight for all people here on crypto space or on this forum itself.

We have to be more ready for this, it is still good for a level 1 KYC with Roobet, but if they will start to ask for some proof or documents, that could be alarming and for sure many will not comply. Well, let’s just hope that they will make an announcement first before they implement this kind of changes, because for sure many are still not ok with KYC, and they will leave right away if the site started to require this.

It was back then, but every day is a new day for crypto casinos.  What is ok yesterday may not be ok today or what is ok today may change tomorrow.  The same goes for the implementation of KYC.  We really can't compare the rules of yesterday and today.  Years or months back, Roobet is ok with no KYC withdrawal even with a large sum of money but due to the changes in regulations and requirements of the authority regarding casinos, Roobet and other casinos have to adapt to the implemented regulations if they wanted to operate smoothly.


True but I think the trend of Casino will be KYC implementation so it would be just a matter of time before those non-KYC Casinos start requiring their player to submit documents for KYC.

Hate to break it to you, but I did win big amounts(0.5 BTC) from a crypto gambling site sometime back and they never asked me KYC. I never won consistently anywhere which is why my bet limits were never reduced so far.

Overall, it's still possible to withdraw your winnings from some crypto gambling sites without providing KYC.

For sure it was updated on Sept 1, the same date you asked when it was updated and marked resolved. Hovering the mouse on the dotted line under the date will show when the post is edited.



That guy is indeed impatient.  The worst is that he is threatening Roobet to kill himself and put the blame on the casino.  This kind of player should be outright banned from the casino because it would do no good and only put the casino in trouble if the same thing happens again even no matter who is at fault the next time.

It's great that the issue about his account has been resolved by Roobet team.
Now since it has already been resolved, I don't think the user care much of editing/updating posts that might threaten Roobet's reputation (somehow). The user has not even been active for 2 days since the first of September, the time that the issue has been sort out. I think he doesn't care anymore as he already received his money. I can understand him since he only joined the forum for that sole reason.

There are many such cases where gamblers don't wait long enough and open up scam accusations thread against the casino but they need to realise that if the team has contacted them and there's some technical issues then legit casinos like Roobet would refund the money as we have seen earlier also.So he also need to give heads up for this and update his post.

Reducing the limit is still possible though not all site will implement this one since KYC doesn't asked for any proof of income and I've been dealing with some site already with KYC so far they didn't reduce my limit. If you're into Roobet, you can just ask their support for the reason and if you are betting big maybe you can also request for the limit increase, KYC is a thing now almost the top site are already asking for this, regulations push them to ask  KYC.

How is that obvious? You generalize and draw a conclusion based on your experience at one casino that the same rules apply at all casinos. That doesn't have to be true. What has been obvious so far is that each gambling provider has its own approach to AML regulations and implements its own KYC procedures. While some allow withdrawal without in-depth KYC verification up to certain amounts, others will request the same on the first withdrawal, regardless of the amount. Also, there are those who claim to conduct KYC verification by random selection (although I personally don't think this is true).

I agree with you and you are right at the first stage but all time you will be right that is not true. I use a gambling site (bitsler) from several years and  they never asked me any kyc and they provided me telegram support. But while I have win few days ago they asked me to verify kyc and after verification they reduced my bet limit on cricket. So, those site which you are using obviously will do the same if you win any big amount. Also they may decrease your bet limit.

For a company or casino which do spent up thousands of dollars per week on their marketing  then its really hard to believe that they would really be not able to pay some winnings or hold up some withdrawal
with those sheer amounts.There might be some delays or something but it wont be directly be talking about scamming attempt or behavior.Cant really just believe that Roobet would really be doing
something like this and since its been resolved then that complainant should really be minding on closing up the thread so that everything would be cleared and wont really be
creating some bad impression towards the site.

Roobet had been sendingi money on campaign and art contest and I was very sure that the team will never take anything from gamblers about him that was posting on the Roobet signature campaign thread of the team not listening to his lamentation.
Everything is patience in this life and I don't know why op was not that patient enough to allow the team to respond to his problem before going tough. Now that everything had been resolved, he needed to go clear and delete every bad words he had written about Roobet.