Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 3. (Read 82109 times)

Being a monthly art campaign that has been running for quite a while, I even made a lot of work for the art campaign.
Roobet made it very outstanding, remaining consistent in any case to date.

Now, Only 10 people have used Roobet's signature at the moment, and those selected are naturally very lucky.
How not, Roobet has reached 210 weeks to date and remains actively paying its participants.

If Roobet still survives today, then they believe that what Members do in this forum gives good feedback for Roobet,
they successfully build their products and brand.

Oh, my bad. I assumed that the Roobet signature campaign had already ended because I'm very active here in Bitcointalk but I haven't seen (or noticed) anyone wearing the Roobet signature. Yeah, about the roobet contest, I'm part of it and I always keep my eye on that Roobet contest. That's why I never miss one. I've been participating on it since April 2023 if I'm not mistaken.

The Signature is very much still going and alive. Entering the 210th consecutive week this week actually. They just reduced the size of it, which is not really an issue. They also run monthly art contests on here which have been going on for years at this point too!

Not surprised after roobet ended their signature campaign here in bitcointalk, this announcement thread is not active like before and still OP is inactive. Anyway, after 5 years in the crypto casino industry, Roobet finally allows their players to deposit TRX (Tron).

Announcement from Roobet X: https://twitter.com/Roobet/status/1772306120276680744

Others will try to bet 2x what they lost with the hope of recovering their money just to end up losing more.

Of course yes, it is https://bitcasino.io/blog in that blog you can find the articles and they are very interesting, the truth is that they have been very useful to me, there is a clarity of the things for the games, I have learned a lot about roulettes, about slots, it really is pure gold, thanks to these articles I am now a fan of slots. The book you're talking about looks very interesting, I'm going to look for it too, I'm very interested in how they do that little intervention that goes from chess to poker, I've always played chess and it's one of the things that I'm passionate about, since I was a child I've always played a life as an athlete, and I have always liked this sport, and if it is to switch to poker , then I have Always wanted to see what the main strategies that professionals make are to make the perfect exchange of strategy from chess to poker, I imagine that is the purpose of the book.

It's tough to tell. Some of them do walk away quickly and never gamble big amounts again thereby staying in the profit zone and making sure that the house doesn't beat them in the long-term.

Some others get greedy and continue gambling throwing away their winnings and end up helping the house win in the long-term.

interesting, do you have the link for any of these articles you mention? I'd love to check it

regarding chess vs poker there's a really good book called "thinking in bets" by Anne Duke I read it and it's great
it's more about probabilistic thinking applied to life than about the games itself but it's one worth to check
she says life is way more about poker (unpredictability, possibility to fold, etc) than like chess

Well, the truth is, chess has always caught my attention, I have some medals that I won, but only when I was in high school, but it catches my attention because many very good and famous chess players have turned to poker. and that catches my attention, of course I understand their logic, poker is much less complicated, but it requires many strategies and luck, then with all the mental theory that is in your mind any chess player can do something of money if applied with the same discipline as poker, of course there are some things that have to be taken, like experience, like everything related to doing things better in how to be able to have more skill, when playing in PVP mode it is where there is more opportunity to win, at least that's what I think, although several members of the forum say that that has nothing to do with it.

This makes me remember when I go to a physical casino I like to play roulette when there are many people, that in roulette you have to win yes or yes, for me it is much better to play like this because I feel that I have more chances of winning than I can play alone against the casino software as such, in fact in current casinos they should give those options in PVP mode, like Black Jack, and with respect to roulette, yes, you have not read Karl's articles on the ebl blog. bitcasino.io? There is a lot of high quality information regarding roulette, slots and all this.

Can't determine the accurate action done by a person regarding on that cases since usually experience gambler which have discipline usually walk away after they win huge since they know what will happen next if they decide to continue.

Usually this continuation of their gambling activity after they get a big win happens on newbies or have little experience on this situation since usually there luck will continue and they can receive a lot more that's why they end up on more risky situation and on verge to lost everything they won including their capital used. If they can't afford to lose much better for people to think about what are their priorities so that they can set up some threshold or plan towards their gambling session to avoid any huge lose or anything that can cut off their chance to secure their winnings.

I wonder if the successful ones, that end up beating the house and walking away with a lot will just keep playing until they win and stopping after a big win, or if they do it in a different way
because I see many cases of people who can't stop playing and end up giving all their money to the house or to other market participants.

As a big business, they don't arbitrarily deploy new policies without consent to their lawyers because there is risk to self-destroy a business if they implement something that is not mandatory to keep their business running. If it brings inconvenience and uncomfortable to users, while competitors don't do this, they have risk to lose customers.

Roobet team actually knew about it and they did went through carefully internal consideration before doing this.

The contest will end on 22 March and there are 3 more weeks to submit arts and find chances to win one of awards with very good prize.

---

Beyond the contest, don't forget to check odds of today matches in Champions League with two matches: Bayern Munich vs Lazio Rome; Real Sociedad vs Paris Saint-Germain.
https://roobet.com/sports

And Roobet is definitely one of those sites that you can trust. We might don't really know what's risky and what's not, but their lawyers, they know all that stuff perfectly. With no worries we can submit all the data they are asking for.

---

Guys, don't miss this amazing $50k Celebration Art Contest. We are nearing $70k now, but let's  celebrate crossing $50k first. We've been waiting for that for so long. Congrats to all Bitcoin enthusiasts!  

Roobet did a good job in marketing but I guess it also depends on luck. There have been many casinos that organized a signature campaign, had a deposit bonus and even organized some forum events, but somewhere they never really became popular. But Roobet has been doing it for a while and they keep organizing the art contests also so they build a great trackrecord.

People who wanted anyone's identity can just go to the government register office.  He can just bribe the personnel there and get the full history of the person.  If any of us think that our identity has yet to be compromised, think again...  With all these government system hacks, private company database hacks, and insurance database hacks, do we still think that these bad people have yet to get our details?  How about when we buy stuff online?  I do not know why too many people are so sensitive about KYC.  And if I don't want to undergo KYC, I'll just stop using their services, why do we have to make all of the drama about KYC?  If we want to use anyone's service specifically in gambling, we follow and respect their TOS.  

@Luckmcfly, in gambling there is no game without luck.  That is the truth.  Whether it is a sports betting, blackjack, poker or slots... all these game needs the element of luck in order to secure a win.  Just for example, if one is not lucky even if he has the strongest four of a kind, he can still be beaten by the opponent if the person happens to have a straight flush.  Aside from that the initial card distribution has a huge effect on the gameplay.  Now I wonder what is the relation of chess and poker..., they are very different games, even a chess grandmaster may have a hard time winning in poker if he happens to face a good lucky player.



My guess is a little bit of bankroll management and a huge bit of luck.


I have witnessed Roobet from the beginning, they did all they could in terms of advertisement, they have sig camp, promotional bonuses, and forum events to keep the members in this forum well aware of the existence of Roobet.  Aside from that I seldom see complaints about Roobet and if there is I think it does not take long for the casino to solve the problem.

interesting to put poker and chess on the same "bucket" as strategy, and I agree that both require skill but they are very different
chess always has the best move and you get good by knowing what is the best move to do at a given moment
on poker it's more about odds and bluffing could change everything (you can win without a good hand)

curious to hear your friends strategies on the roulette since this is way more luck, are the strategies related to bankroll management?

Well this is very different as a regulation to control the entire world and it is a consequence of what should never have been accepted, I am not saying anything that the casino companies are good and that they have emerged for good, but taking into consideration that the things now with the KYC they are putting them in as if it were the best, well it is something that I do not believe, of course as I have said before, I have only left KYC in casinos that are the most reliable, for example Roobet as well as stake.com, bitcasino and many more, so now how do they want to implement KYC in all casinos anyway, they say that it is to have more security to return the dfnood in case of hacking, many things like that, but before in 2017 how did they do? Only the user ID and email was enough to respond to all the possible problems that were generated.

I start from what can be achieved, for example a casino that has everything implemented and falls into a possible Hack that can have the consequence that the casino is not responsible enough that they will use their clients' funds to extract them.

And even if you have everything about the KYC, they will not respond except in time, that is what we need to see, then if things are better with the KYC, they Can still scam people , then the casino that acts badly does things like that, In my case I will always say something, when a casino wants to do things well and puts its customers first before the rules, for me it is a good casino, many times we have talked about how there should be amounts available to withdraw without doing a KYC for For example , up to $2K or $5K is Enough to withdraw as normal without KYC , but to Withdraw 100usd or less you have to do a KYC, I don't see that well, of course each casino has its policies and its Tos, which we should read very carefully before to do anything, because it is money that is being risked and knowing what we are getting into.

Aside from spending a long time for building up their reputation theirs also huge money used to make their casino more visible to people so no wonder that nowadays they are now sustainable and one of the best casino exist in the market.

And for making their business remain reputable this became an option for people since the reputation will always matter and they could decide to gamble because they know that Roobet would never let them down compared to other new casino that they don't know if they are for real or not. This is why its important for people to only choose the reputable casino which already have good track record so they can avoid any possible scams.

Building a reputation takes a long time as it takes time before people really start trusting a site and see that is reliable. Destroying a reputation can happen over night, it just need some legit cases of people that are having problems that don’t get solved in a good way. Not saying that that would happen to Roobet but maintaining is a good reputation is key.

They spent a long time to build up their business and gain good reputation. It's not easy to achieve so after achieving it, it's hard to destroy it all as a big and successful casino can get good profit from their operation.

It's better to keep their business running smoothly and transparently, fairly for their customers as it helps them to gain very sustainable income includes good profit.

A scam casino can do their scams against users with KYC or without KYC. KYC card can be a favorite tool to refuse a user withdrawal request but such business will not last long. On a trusted platform like Roobet, if you use your own documents, with good resolution, you will successfully KYCed and no doubt that your money will stuck because of failed KYC.