Topic: Royse777, Bitlucy and long story in brief - page 2. (Read 9492 times)

Quite a while ago I had distrusted Royse777 then later I removed that distrust as I couldn't recall why I'd placed them on my distrust list. At that same time a few others also removed their distrust of Royse777.

Reading through this thread my thoughts were indifferent, then I read this:


~Royse777

Any negatives by Royse777 against myself from this point on I will consider to be retaliatory.

You have raised a valid concern but as usual Royse777 has not answered questions she finds difficult to explain. Bitlucy does not exist. Under which rules and under which jurisdiction is Royse777 asking for KYC?

It seems KYC or not, Royse777 stated she will not send the victim money that was scammed by Bitlucy even after Royse777 promised to return to all victims.

I use my browser extension: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/beta-bpip-extension-user-info-add-on-extension-for-firefox-chrome-et-al-5224821

Otherwise (and the way I did it before the extension) I have a template saved as a text file, so I would copy-paste that, and then copy paste relevant bits from the feedback page:


This is for negative trust. The color/b/i tags would have to be changed for neutral and positive (just "i" for neutral and just "b" for positive).

You should have the reworded tag in the first place before making it sounds a way of demanding apology in exchange for it.


When you are saying you lowered the tag then be careful it was not for AnotherAlt's post. It now sounds like you were looking for a good excuse to lower it.
Your intention to give the tag (2nd)
1. Slandering.
2. Wanted an exchange.
I explained all in the locked thread.

Clearly I said some of you. And these some of you includes you and JollyGood with maximum 2 to 3 more users. Does it sound like a blame by the way or more of pissed to find nonsense demands?
Your implying of everyone is wrong. It sounds like everyone gave you a job to speak for them. In your past you have your mistakes too so don't wash your hand and say hey look! I am clean!

Sorry dkbit I really wanted to live in peace after all these happened to me but some users are taking away my sleep. This is an emotional place for me. Long years. It's been a part of my everyday life. I am fine to take criticism based on the facts but I will not allow anyone to spread lie against me. If I do not reply then after few years when everything will cool down then they (who had no idea what happened) will make it guaranteed that these lies were true.  

@suchmoon, how to you copy and paste an entire feedback please?

Do we really need to have one more thread talking about relationship between this two members?
I think that opposing party Yahoo asked everyone in this topic to stop mentioning and disturbing him, because for him this case is closed.
If they can't come up in private messages, and both say sorry for their actions, than it's better for them to ignore each other, instead of creating World War Manager.  

I don't know what you expected to achieve, but you are just making things worse with creating one more topic that is locked.
Can't you just say sorry and try to talk with him in private?
You don't have to like each other, but stop acting like spoiled school kids.

You're not in DT.

Do you really think a red tag from you would irritate or hurt me in the least? Tag me. My tag on you just needs reworded and it's still valid. Your tag is just you being a baby.

Obviously you do still care

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/feedback-reference-for-yahoo-5406722

Bottom line, I got pissed at the way you act like a child towards me and decided to remove myself from the situation and readd the red tag that I gave you when the situation started. You created the situation, and IMO are obligated to answer any goddamn question that I might ask as long as it pertains to the situation. Instead of trying to answer questions with a cool head, you decided to be hotheaded and childish and not only not answer my inquiries, but also accuse me of stealing clients lmao. Your client contacted me for a 1 week campaign.

I was trying to be sympathetic in the beginning but you changed my feelings.

Do you deserve an apology? No, maybe a pacifier. Do I deserve 1, a case could be made both ways. You dragged me back into this disaster acting like Koil and creating a thread and locking it showing the community even more of your childish behavior.

I'll lower my tag to a neutral, but not because of anything you did. I got my answers in the next post from AnotherAlt whom I merited if anyone wants to check. I think you are easily aggravated and very hotheaded and have no business in DT. Go try and enjoy life instead of blaming everyone else for your mistakes.

It does not bother me anymore. You should be happy that I did not use my DT status against you that I did not paint your wall red.

Don't forget to complete your quest by ~yahoo62278 in your trust list. I'd at least like you to look like you have a clue.

I hope you will consider the annoying users like JollyGood and some others who will give their everything to make the reader to forget what they read in the main reference post after reading two pages of conversations if I unlock the thread. Besides the post is full of references linked to various posts. If anyone is genuinely interested then they will take the time to visit the some of the links.

However, if yahoo has anything to add then ask him to apologize first for saying misinformation about me (If I could be disrespectful to the trust system then I would ask the apology in the same fashion). Then I will give him a chance to reply to the topic (only for him) before locking it again so that JollyGood does not get a chance to write their nonsense arguments to mislead the reader.

why do you still insist on KYC in order to repay deposits? what is it for?
as far as I've seen Bitlucy is dead, and the website is offline. so there is no one behind it, to whom KYC is actually shown?
I understood that KYC verification was requested for the return of the deposit, correct me if I'm wrong.


Creating a new thread and locking it, it's kind of bad practice. especially when you criticize someone a lot.
this topic (started by you) is quite enough for your feedback/reference to yahoo, you always can point a reference link to your post here.

Right, but you already created a thread, why not leave it open instead of making people look for context elsewhere? Now here's what happens: someone sees a trust rating on yahoo, they follow the reference link (possibly months/years from now when the memory of this current dispute has faded), and there is only your opinion in a locked thread. That's kinda misleading. It would be more fair to leave it open at least for a couple of pages so that yahoo and/or others can respond, then you could lock if it starts getting off rails.

First I thought to leave a red tag (same as he did) then changed mind because leaving red will be completely a misuse of current trust rating. Edited the title.

Betesports removed. My mind was tricking about him being one too.

Two never replied my email.
One observed everything and insisted me that he / she is fine and understand my situation. Thank you if you are reading it.
One ended up being too hostile and decided not to co-operate me. I was asked to KYC him (my hands are still tied and considering the situation it will be for good) because he was threatening to kill the CEO and confirmed hiring professional killer from darkweb. He denied even after I had evidence of the conversation he was posting in his private social channels to his audience.

In the feedback page we do not have option to create discussion. Following that setting, whatever comment left on the feedback page - if anyone wants to defend then they usually create a new thread or continue in any existing thread which is related to the case (like this thread). I did not want to hijack the topic to post off-topic.

There are posts in this thread pointing out Royse777 showing anger and frustration, I would liken those outbursts akin to throwing tantrums. Creating that locked thread Red tag reference for yahoo seems to be yet another manifestation of that tantrum and anger on part of Royse777.

Royse777 is playing a game trying with some of the most desperate attempts at creating misdirection in that locked thread along with trying to cause further fragmentation between members on the subject of the Royse777/Bitlucy scam.

Creating that thread trying to tarnish the reputation of yahoo62278 with nonsensical drama in an attempt to have that negative trust removed, really is a new low for Royse777. And that neutral trust Royse777 left for yahoo62278 (saying he cannot be trusted) is ludicrous to say the least because of the two: one of them announced herself as "Co-Partner & Marketing Director" of the Bitlucy scam casino and the other quite clearly said nothing of the sort.

Still the wait goes on. Instead of trying to drum up more diversions it would have been a good move on part of Royse777 to have commented on this herself without anybody having to ask about it because that is where the priority should be: refunds

Not sure how well you know the forum to be honest. But since you used the short form "JJG", I somehow felt you could know him pretty well.

I also don't know how sharp your view is... Anyway, four eyes are likely to see more than two eyes. You are very welcome.

Thanks for that. As you can see, I was talking about my personal experience but thanks for pointing me to that JJG's post.


That's what I call a neutral tag of negative spirit. It's clearly negative but of neutral color.


I agree.

It says "red tag" in the thread but the actual trust rating is neutral:


But using a locked thread (although "legal" for trust ratings unlike e.g. for flags) is a dick move to say the least. It would be better to point it to the actual post that triggered the rating (or an archive thereof), or at least have an open thread for it.

Interesting observation, but those who know the forum well also knew that you must have been wrong.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60567589

If you mean just the "length" as in terms of geometry, it is really close. If you go with the number of characters not quoted, JJG clearly wins!

Another drama begin Red tag reference for yahoo I don't know why this kind thread need to be opened and it's a locked thread where he don't have any interest with other people view regarding his thread. I think it's should be solved personal and not trying to attack each other.

I'm not sure Betesports can be said as a troll since I see his accusation was legit.

Anyway it's already a month, any news about the refund to those victim especially those who have been filled the google form?