For and against open-source?
Open-source is generally better than closed-source, but not necessarily more secure. Open-source allows those who know what they are doing to inspect the codebase. If you can't do that yourself, you can have some comfort in the fact that someone else probably has. This is the case with popular open-source projects. But if we are talking about an unknown and unpopular open-source project, you can't really know who has taken the time to look at the code.
Open-source is a window that you can look through and see what is inside. There are no blinds preventing you to look.
Closed-source is a window with blinds and you can't see anything inside.
Illegal, immoral, wrong, and dubious activities can take place in both types of apartments. Those that have no blinds on the windows and those that do. When there are no obstacles blocking the vision, it is much easier to see what is happening, right? But you still need to recognize the activities to understand something wrong is happening. In other words, you need to understand how a piece of code works to understand what is not supposed to be there or how it's supposed to look. If you see a pile of white powder through the window with no blinds and you think it's powdered sugar, what good does it do that the windows have no blinds when the wrong set of eyes are looking in? What good does it do if you don't realize the code has a backdoor when you can't understand it.
Open-source allows you to verify the content (good or bad).
Closed-source doesn't allow you to verify anything. It can be good or bad, but you will never know and you are stuck trusting what the developers tell you.
thanks for the exhaustive explanation, I already knew the difference between open source and closed source, however for those like me who don't know anything about programming codes, they still have to rely on information taken from others, but whoever tells me that this person declares that the open one is it clean at the source? who gives me this security? in the end you have to rely on someone. by that it doesn't mean that closed source is more reliable
the safepal team had made several airdrops of both their SFP token and others they added almost all the chains present how: solana, fantom, polygon, avax, heco, kcc, arbitrum, near, songbird and many others
I would never waste a single satoshi on buying Safepal wallet, and this is all worthless shitcoins and buying hardware wallet just to get few bucks from some airdrops is not very smart, especially if they are asking for any kind of identity verification.
No need to repeat ourselves about Safepal wallet, just read everything that is written in this topic and know that Safepal has serious flaws in their design.
Kraken team wrote more about Safepal but we also discussed about that in forum so you can check that out:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/safepal-s1-wallet-have-serious-flaws-5317884I respect your opinion, I opened this topic to do a little review about this product, I never did reseller or referral, however many other multicoin wallets also do airdrop. so the topic doesn't necessarily have to be filled with praise towards safepal but also with talking about the problems. every opinion is always well accepted by me