Topic: Satoshi Identity Revealed LOL (Read 3950 times)
Satoshi Nakamoto is "moniker John Sakocius 616", where t is u because of ASL, c is o-t-a=3 because of alpha numerics; that also applies to reducing J from 10 to 1 which is A, and 616 is M which is his area code, "he s one of my accountants on the other side"
I don't think you seems to have understand why people aren't much cared about his identity being revealed because if you do then you would probably be against someone or people talking about unveiling his identity. Bitcoin is still Young and hasn't come that extent where the creator would have to showcase themselves and I know it's not yet time to display himself maybe or after legalization then there will be call to that extent where he (they) will come to showcase as the real creators.
Perhaps you’re right!Maybe I really don’t understand why the identity of Bitcoin creator would matter so much and to what extent would it have to influence or threaten the existence of Bitcoin. So hopefully you’d be kind enough to help clarify me on the implications of his identity being unveiled before Bitcoin finally reaches mainstream adoption because i honestly don’t get it and I’m pretty curious, ( not like I care that much) but it wouldn’t be too bad to at least know the reason why, at least for knowledge purposes. So please do let me know.
Better yet just look at BTC itself and its future.
After all - Satoshi and his "reveal" wouldn't change things up for BTC in fact, and it would only be a headache for the man or the group itself if he were revealed eventually.
I don't think you seems to have understand why people aren't much cared about his identity being revealed because if you do then you would probably be against someone or people talking about unveiling his identity. Bitcoin is still Young and hasn't come that extent where the creator would have to showcase themselves and I know it's not yet time to display himself maybe or after legalization then there will be call to that extent where he (they) will come to showcase as the real creators.
It's better to keep this "mystery" shut.
It's like a Pandora's box - nobody knows how it would affect the marker overall in the long run. But it definitely would cause harm to Satoshi himself.
I don't think you seems to have understand why people aren't much cared about his identity being revealed because if you do then you would probably be against someone or people talking about unveiling his identity. Bitcoin is still Young and hasn't come that extent where the creator would have to showcase themselves and I know it's not yet time to display himself maybe or after legalization then there will be call to that extent where he (they) will come to showcase as the real creators.
Perhaps you’re right!Maybe I really don’t understand why the identity of Bitcoin creator would matter so much and to what extent would it have to influence or threaten the existence of Bitcoin. So hopefully you’d be kind enough to help clarify me on the implications of his identity being unveiled before Bitcoin finally reaches mainstream adoption because i honestly don’t get it and I’m pretty curious, ( not like I care that much) but it wouldn’t be too bad to at least know the reason why, at least for knowledge purposes. So please do let me know.
I too don't see the implications for the BTC itself - it wouldn't change what BTC stands for and how it works. Nothing, in fact, besides the fact that would be forced for a day or a week and then eventually die down, changed with another, and then another.
I don't think you seems to have understand why people aren't much cared about his identity being revealed because if you do then you would probably be against someone or people talking about unveiling his identity. Bitcoin is still Young and hasn't come that extent where the creator would have to showcase themselves and I know it's not yet time to display himself maybe or after legalization then there will be call to that extent where he (they) will come to showcase as the real creators.
Perhaps you’re right!Maybe I really don’t understand why the identity of Bitcoin creator would matter so much and to what extent would it have to influence or threaten the existence of Bitcoin. So hopefully you’d be kind enough to help clarify me on the implications of his identity being unveiled before Bitcoin finally reaches mainstream adoption because i honestly don’t get it and I’m pretty curious, ( not like I care that much) but it wouldn’t be too bad to at least know the reason why, at least for knowledge purposes. So please do let me know.
Better yet just look at BTC itself and its future.
After all - Satoshi and his "reveal" wouldn't change things up for BTC in fact, and it would only be a headache for the man or the group itself if he were revealed eventually.
I don't think you seems to have understand why people aren't much cared about his identity being revealed because if you do then you would probably be against someone or people talking about unveiling his identity. Bitcoin is still Young and hasn't come that extent where the creator would have to showcase themselves and I know it's not yet time to display himself maybe or after legalization then there will be call to that extent where he (they) will come to showcase as the real creators.
Perhaps you’re right!Maybe I really don’t understand why the identity of Bitcoin creator would matter so much and to what extent would it have to influence or threaten the existence of Bitcoin. So hopefully you’d be kind enough to help clarify me on the implications of his identity being unveiled before Bitcoin finally reaches mainstream adoption because i honestly don’t get it and I’m pretty curious, ( not like I care that much) but it wouldn’t be too bad to at least know the reason why, at least for knowledge purposes. So please do let me know.
I don't think you seems to have understand why people aren't much cared about his identity being revealed because if you do then you would probably be against someone or people talking about unveiling his identity. Bitcoin is still Young and hasn't come that extent where the creator would have to showcase themselves and I know it's not yet time to display himself maybe or after legalization then there will be call to that extent where he (they) will come to showcase as the real creators.
Perhaps you’re right!Maybe I really don’t understand why the identity of Bitcoin creator would matter so much and to what extent would it have to influence or threaten the existence of Bitcoin. So hopefully you’d be kind enough to help clarify me on the implications of his identity being unveiled before Bitcoin finally reaches mainstream adoption because i honestly don’t get it and I’m pretty curious, ( not like I care that much) but it wouldn’t be too bad to at least know the reason why, at least for knowledge purposes. So please do let me know.
You think this is possible to reveal his identity?
To me like I know, the creator of bitcoin can't just be revealed that way couples with the vision of bitcoin as a financial freedom, and a decentralized asset and if this is defeated then what more should we rely on knowing that bitcoin is pron and vulnerable to attack. I could have loved to click on the link but due to security reasons I wouldn't click to watch. But again don't you think the creator of that post is doing that to gain attention?
Why do people think that it’s impossible to unravel the mystery behind Satoshi’s disappearance or to reveal his identity? Yeah I’m grateful to the man, his extraordinarily smart brains and his tremendous and notable contribution to humanity which even in his absence we still enjoy, but this dude is only just human, so if he’s still alive somewhere and just taking up a fake identity or just hiding in the shadows then I see no reason why it seems impossible to reveal his identity. To me like I know, the creator of bitcoin can't just be revealed that way couples with the vision of bitcoin as a financial freedom, and a decentralized asset and if this is defeated then what more should we rely on knowing that bitcoin is pron and vulnerable to attack. I could have loved to click on the link but due to security reasons I wouldn't click to watch. But again don't you think the creator of that post is doing that to gain attention?
Not that I care too much about really knowing who this man is (but it wouldn’t be bad to know though) or revealing his identity would change anything about the nature of bitcoin or maybe take down bitcoin’s firewalls (I stand to be corrected). Bitcoin has always been pron to attack, We’re all aware of the 2018 51% attack or is it the 2020 Blockchain Reorganization Attack, The Dusting Attacks and several others. There have been so many unsuccessful attacks even without Satoshi’s identity being revealed, so why should there be a difference if/when the man’s identity is finally revealed?
You think this is possible to reveal his identity?
To me like I know, the creator of bitcoin can't just be revealed that way couples with the vision of bitcoin as a financial freedom, and a decentralized asset and if this is defeated then what more should we rely on knowing that bitcoin is pron and vulnerable to attack. I could have loved to click on the link but due to security reasons I wouldn't click to watch. But again don't you think the creator of that post is doing that to gain attention?
Why do people think that it’s impossible to unravel the mystery behind Satoshi’s disappearance or to reveal his identity? Yeah I’m grateful to the man, his extraordinarily smart brains and his tremendous and notable contribution to humanity which even in his absence we still enjoy, but this dude is only just human, so if he’s still alive somewhere and just taking up a fake identity or just hiding in the shadows then I see no reason why it seems impossible to reveal his identity. To me like I know, the creator of bitcoin can't just be revealed that way couples with the vision of bitcoin as a financial freedom, and a decentralized asset and if this is defeated then what more should we rely on knowing that bitcoin is pron and vulnerable to attack. I could have loved to click on the link but due to security reasons I wouldn't click to watch. But again don't you think the creator of that post is doing that to gain attention?
Not that I care too much about really knowing who this man is (but it wouldn’t be bad to know though) or revealing his identity would change anything about the nature of bitcoin or maybe take down bitcoin’s firewalls (I stand to be corrected). Bitcoin has always been pron to attack, We’re all aware of the 2018 51% attack or is it the 2020 Blockchain Reorganization Attack, The Dusting Attacks and several others. There have been so many unsuccessful attacks even without Satoshi’s identity being revealed, so why should there be a difference if/when the man’s identity is finally revealed?
Stephen Mollah is rich of trading gold in World of Warcraft for BTC since begining ?
Do you believe Cobra is guilty ?
Let's face it - Satoshi is dead!
Mexico has created an alter dedicated to the creator of Bitcoin in a sort of Day of the Dead celebration for BTC's 16th Birthday:
https://www.theblock.co/post/323802/bitcoin-edges-close-to-all-time-high-as-it-marks-its-sweet-16th-birthday
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/04/bTr3d.jpeg
https://x.com/BitcoinNewsCom/status/1852446269673034203
Mexico has created an alter dedicated to the creator of Bitcoin in a sort of Day of the Dead celebration for BTC's 16th Birthday:
https://www.theblock.co/post/323802/bitcoin-edges-close-to-all-time-high-as-it-marks-its-sweet-16th-birthday
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/04/bTr3d.jpeg
https://x.com/BitcoinNewsCom/status/1852446269673034203
The idea is very, very cool, and traditions from Mexico themselves are pretty interesting, in my opinion.
Let's hope it was done well and Satoshi wouldn't need to attend it to prove them all wrong
Let's face it - Satoshi is dead!
Yeah probably he was but unlike his death the controversy cant died out in the process. I think majority who are noisy about it can pass up the idea that Satoshi cant never be renamed again or identify.As much as I wanted to know too, but for the sake of the person/people invented it maybe it better be stay this way.
Dead or alive - he is safe and sound, and that is what matters the most.
Let's face it - Satoshi is dead!
Yeah probably he was but unlike his death the controversy cant died out in the process. I think majority who are noisy about it can pass up the idea that Satoshi cant never be renamed again or identify.As much as I wanted to know too, but for the sake of the person/people invented it maybe it better be stay this way.
Let's face it - Satoshi is dead!
Mexico has created an alter dedicated to the creator of Bitcoin in a sort of Day of the Dead celebration for BTC's 16th Birthday:
https://www.theblock.co/post/323802/bitcoin-edges-close-to-all-time-high-as-it-marks-its-sweet-16th-birthday
https://x.com/BitcoinNewsCom/status/1852446269673034203
Mexico has created an alter dedicated to the creator of Bitcoin in a sort of Day of the Dead celebration for BTC's 16th Birthday:
https://www.theblock.co/post/323802/bitcoin-edges-close-to-all-time-high-as-it-marks-its-sweet-16th-birthday
https://x.com/BitcoinNewsCom/status/1852446269673034203
Here we go, another one to add to the list
This guy is probably the worst idiot that pretends to be Satoshi.I listened to new Faketoshi aka Stephen Mollah speaking in this ''press conference'' circus and I was laughing a lot
One of the guys who was there recorded anbd uploaded several videos, and you would be shocked to hear all the ''inventions'' of this new clown allegedly made.
Link for one of the 6 videos:
https://youtu.be/JenDTrIsDMU
Many of Stephen Mollah UK ''companies'':
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/ErKFFDDlOIAHqFfuaDngSyPXn0Q/appointments
Here we go, another one to add to the list:
I wouldn't say "all the time" but dormant addresses wake up occasionally. It would have been more impressive if they were mined a year earlier.
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/15sxzZ4QSaoiMo5KYH9ab4xQj34yeJmKgb
is this appening many time ?
is this appening many time ?
I wouldn't say "all the time" but dormant addresses wake up occasionally. It would have been more impressive if they were mined a year earlier.
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/15sxzZ4QSaoiMo5KYH9ab4xQj34yeJmKgb
is this appening many time ?
is this appening many time ?
But what is a big question for me personally about this is why they take the time to find out who Satoshi really is? They want to validate what Shega takes time, energy and resources for a study, concluding Len Sassaman as a Satoshi candidate is that possible?
Aside from being a documentary which will gather a lot of viewers and interest, Im sure its a business too. The topic is quite interesting especially to a lot of users, and this will click to viewers and potential subscriber who wanted to know any details for that.Not mentioned in the docs but the show focuses on Adam Back and Peter todd.
So thats their primary suspect among a lot of potential to be Satoshi, but still not enough proof on any of the showcase details.
Just watched the HBO documentary. Kinda cool to reminisce some important event on Bitcoin creation, and some of the people involved with that. Quite astonishing that Adam Black, Peter Todd and some, cooperated with the HBO to make this possible though seen also Gmaxwell being flagged on some scene and explanation. If those evidences find are just a trap from Satoshi to lead them to people whom the HBO personnel think Satoshi was then he/them is truly a genius to hide or planned that this could turn out to this.
I haven't watched it to this day, because I haven't had time but it seems that your expression is quite interesting, the care of Satoshi's identity becomes very serious for them so that the identification of people who have been in contact with him is the evidence they want to collect to find it.But what is a big question for me personally about this is why they take the time to find out who Satoshi really is? They want to validate what Shega takes time, energy and resources for a study, concluding Len Sassaman as a Satoshi candidate is that possible?
Jump to: