Topic: Satoshi Identity Revealed LOL - page 2. (Read 4148 times)

This guy is probably the worst idiot that pretends to be Satoshi.
I listened  to new Faketoshi  aka Stephen Mollah speaking in this ''press conference'' circus and I was laughing a lot
One of the guys who was there recorded anbd uploaded several videos, and you would be shocked to hear all the ''inventions'' of this new clown allegedly made.

Link for one of the 6 videos:  
https://youtu.be/JenDTrIsDMU

Many of Stephen Mollah UK ''companies'':
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/ErKFFDDlOIAHqFfuaDngSyPXn0Q/appointments

Here we go, another one to add to the list:




I wouldn't say "all the time" but dormant addresses wake up occasionally. It would have been more impressive if they were mined a year earlier.

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/15sxzZ4QSaoiMo5KYH9ab4xQj34yeJmKgb

is this appening many time ?

Aside from being a documentary which will gather a lot of viewers and interest, Im sure its a business too. The topic is quite interesting especially to a lot of users, and this will click to viewers and potential subscriber who wanted to know any details for that.

Not mentioned in the docs but the show focuses on Adam Back and Peter todd.

So thats their primary suspect among a lot of potential to be Satoshi, but still not enough proof on any of the showcase details.

I haven't watched it to this day, because I haven't had time but it seems that your expression is quite interesting, the care of Satoshi's identity becomes very serious for them so that the identification of people who have been in contact with him is the evidence they want to collect to find it.
But what is a big question for me personally about this is why they take the time to find out who Satoshi really is? They want to validate what Shega takes time, energy and resources for a study, concluding Len Sassaman as a Satoshi candidate is that possible?

Just watched the HBO documentary. Kinda cool to reminisce some important event on Bitcoin creation, and some of the people involved with that. Quite astonishing that Adam Black, Peter Todd and some, cooperated with the HBO to make this possible though seen also Gmaxwell being flagged on some scene and explanation. If those evidences find are just a trap from Satoshi to lead them to people whom the HBO personnel think Satoshi was then he/them is truly a genius to hide or planned that this could turn out to this.

Sometime I believe you worked on FTPcoin between 2005-2008 before wallet become in BitTorrent helping Hal Finley to mine secret keys in collors pallettes of CWAD or WAD textures files format and you also helped for the creation of FileZila

I kown BITLEN death is a drama and the Hal Finney death is a drama to ...

If im true, sorry 4 the lost of your friends.

Your teams was very kool!

You are my idols I love you cause you helped me thx.

Everyone here(the knowledgable members of the forum at least) knows about Bitcoin and the blockchain as much as the next guy. We only know what we've seen and what we have witnessed. Though, of course, there may have been certain things that have been kept from the light but I got to admit, you make statements as if you know something we don't... Of course, you could be just trolling, how would I know what you truly mean by what you post?

You mention how we have no knowledge of who "Satoshi" is. You're right. You're 100%, no a 1000% right with that claim. But the thing is, what makes you different? Your claim that "government agents and 'Bitcoin community leaders' persecute 'him'" contradicts your other statement that we don't know who Satoshi is.
And as everyone else who've posted on this thread have mentioned, there is no 'Bitcoin community leaders'... If there were, wouldn't it be known to us, as a forum? This is a decentralized system, there is no "leader" here.

True story? Or just another story that makes absurd claims like the recent HBO documentary? As you (should) know, there have been countless, and I mean countless, claims to "reveal the true story" on "blah blah, 20XX". To which no surprise, doesn't even tell anything of relevance.

As much as this is a "crazy" step forward for the eccentric theorists of this forum, it's nothing different than another rubbish post to the average member of this forum.

There are more reasons than that. For example: Satoshi really thought about a model, where all old inputs and outputs are kept, as they were, and where new inputs and outputs can be added, to increase the fee.

For example: you can have this transaction:
And then, Peter Todd thought about this case:
But note, that in this case, you can lose some anonymity, by revealing, which output has less coins than before, and which coin is a potential change (or: you would then force a recipient to pay for increased fees, which is a bad idea).

Instead, what Satoshi thought about, was something like this:
Note that in the latest version, you can actually do that, if you use anchors, for example: https://mempool.space/testnet4/address/tb1pfees9rn5nz

I guess Satoshi is still alive and does not want to show himself to create a huge scene on because imagine you are still anonymous and one day you show up for sure it will take a week and months to issue about the question to him so I guess he okay what he has right now. HBO seems to accumulate a large amount of money on that movie and also create a hype for people which is really on time after the halving they release the movie and now people getting more curious about the bitcoin and recently the bitcoin came with the golden movement of the moving average which is now the price sitting with the 68k. I just wonder until when the price will goes up.

If his still alive. Maybe his watching from Heaven already we dont know.

I think the idea of Satoshi would always have their curiosity out of him. Even me, but what can we do? We all wanted to know his true identity for variety of reason. I didnt watch yet the documentary since Im busy but will likely check it out for my entertainment and maybe scan their proofs.

The more we try to know who Satoshi is, the more we mistake him for someone else. I think it will be better if people give up trying to know Satoshi is because they can never know him so far as he didn't open up on his privacy.

 Satoshi has done very well for giving us bitcoin which is good for us to focus more on it and benefit from it. Since bitcoin have been existing different people do come up with different identity claiming to be Satoshi. Trying to get the identity of Satoshi is just as the more you look the less you see, let's just put that energy in investing bitcoin, with this one can earn value.

I think the ONLY way for anything about Satoshi to make any semblance of sense is to go ahead and assume that cat has (at the very least) the capability of stretching their consciousness across time, if not their physicality too but that is much more difficult, and I would expect a person as brilliant as them to exercise the utmost laziocity (the degree of laziness used while planning to ensure maximal efficiency and righteousness) when putting together a project such as replacing the entire world's financial system and getting every banker fired simultaneously (sort of, nevermind, less simultaneously and more two birds one stonesy)

The person that this description best fits would be that of The Sovereign Lord and Creator, God.   Best bet to make if you're trying to put a wager on who's Satosh

I am not their subscriber, and I watched the documentary like most people who will always find an alternative way. So I don't think they profited from that documentary nearly as much as some people think.

Yeah. Even - if - (and that's a big if) he would be revealed to the public, that wouldn't change much.
But the buzz around the event was there, and HBO may try to do it again in the far future.

He will forever remain anonymous. If he were alive and maybe had the chance to watch the HBO documentary that was released, he would smile and even laugh at all of this.

This is one of the possibilities, because with everything we know, Bitcoin was not created in one year or a shorter period, but apparently it was created over several years, using as a base all those earlier projects that tried something similar. Those projects failed because they had their flaws, but they or whoever designed BTC obviously got the best out of each of those projects and that's where the idea for BTC was born.

These people are without any doubt above average intelligence and they knew that they had to come up with a plan to get such a project online and at the same time remain anonymous. Therefore, I think that if one of them does not one day admit and prove without a doubt who the people behind that project are, the real truth will never be known - which is probably the best.

I don't think there's much evidence to prove it was a group of people. If anything, I think it was just a single person.

Satoshi himself posted about how he was working on it for about a year or so, without mentioning others. Also here's another quote that points towards him just being one person:


Basically he wanted to include the rest of the people, but it seems pretty clear that the project started with only Satoshi as one person.

Satoshi is obviously a made up figure, made up by the first Bitcoin developers. Knowing this the big blockers made up their own Satoshi (Craig Wright) in order to win the Block Size War

The early Satoshi coins are very likely less of a threat than many think.

About 250,000 to one million Bitcoins are traded on exchanges (those tracked at Coingecko and friends) each day. Of course that includes a lot of wash trade and short term speculation, and it includes Bitcoin <-> altcoin exchanges.

But the experience with the BKA coins (called "German Government coins" by some) and the MtGox coins in July/August this year lets me conclude that even if Satoshi sold everything at once (in a few weeks, for example), which is extremely unlikely, the dip could be short and deep but recovery probably would be fast. Neither BKA nor MtGox coins had probably really a lasting influence on Bitcoin's price, the deep 15% dip in August was instead caused by panic after the Nikkei crash. "Many Bitcoiners panicking" is thus much more dangerous (for bulls) than one entity selling.

So I would absolutely be not worried by the Patoshi coins (those suspected to be from Satoshi) moving. It would be even better in the mid to long term if at least some of them move eventually. Bitcoin should circulate and be distributed. And as we know that some people will panic if Satoshi moves their coins, the earlier this happens, the better - so a potential "Damocles sword" is removed from Bitcoin.

Of course we don't know if the coins will be moved or if they are lost. So the best thing for Bitcoiners is just to relax if some of these coins move eventually. And cease to be obsessed with them (and thus with Satoshi's identity). They are not different from other early miners' coins.