Bruce is on now.
EDIT: I think he's drunk. (not sure)
Topic: Satoshi Roundtable Retreat - 70 top Techies & CEOs - What should be covered? - page 4. (Read 9215 times)
February 27, 2016, 09:57:26 PM
February 27, 2016, 09:51:50 PM
How do I fast forward? 
It's live. You can't.
Ya. I know.
Wake me up when the Monero show is over.
It's over, and you missed Roger Ver, with Charlie Lee finishing up, with Dave Bailey in the wings, but it was just NOW announced that Bruce Fenton is about to come on.
February 27, 2016, 09:24:52 PM
How do I fast forward?
It's live. You can't.
Ya. I know.
Wake me up when the Monero show is over.
February 27, 2016, 09:19:47 PM
How do I fast forward?
It's live. You can't.
February 27, 2016, 09:18:42 PM
How do I fast forward?
February 27, 2016, 09:15:22 PM
22 minutes in and its been said 3 times that they are going to talk about what happened so far..
and all they can say "alot of good stuff where they are talking about stuff face to face that they cant do on a forum/reddit or mailing list"
seriously i like the entertainment, but we need the content and context
so far just advertising monero..
EDIT
to address jetcash's comment about reducing the confirm times of bitcoin.. well
monero was 1minute and is increasing to 2minutes because they seen many issues with having such a small confirm time
and all they can say "alot of good stuff where they are talking about stuff face to face that they cant do on a forum/reddit or mailing list"
seriously i like the entertainment, but we need the content and context
so far just advertising monero..
EDIT
to address jetcash's comment about reducing the confirm times of bitcoin.. well
monero was 1minute and is increasing to 2minutes because they seen many issues with having such a small confirm time
February 27, 2016, 09:04:07 PM
Live now! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKd7F-10lxM
Not even five minutes in and Marshall Long was already dissed. I love these guys!
Not even five minutes in and Marshall Long was already dissed. I love these guys!
February 27, 2016, 08:52:07 PM
Besides being Live, will the broadcast be recorded?
google has an option to move it across to youtube easily. so i expect so.. and hope the google group owner does it
Well, that's one step closer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKd7F-10lxM
February 27, 2016, 08:50:05 PM
Besides being Live, will the broadcast be recorded?
google has an option to move it across to youtube easily. so i expect so.. and hope the google group owner does it
February 27, 2016, 08:33:01 PM
Chris Derose and Junseth from Bitcoin Uncensored will broadcast live from the Satoshi Roundtable!
So if you are interested --> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/47xl15/bitcoin_uncensored_at_the_satoshi_roundtable_live/
https://plus.google.com/events/cq4vj4n6ogqa7stsufh32rq1vkc?hl=en
Bruce Fenton is not amused.But hey, who gives a **ck right!
So if you are interested --> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/47xl15/bitcoin_uncensored_at_the_satoshi_roundtable_live/
https://plus.google.com/events/cq4vj4n6ogqa7stsufh32rq1vkc?hl=en
Bruce Fenton is not amused.But hey, who gives a **ck right!
Besides being Live, will the broadcast be recorded?
February 27, 2016, 05:26:00 PM
Chris Derose and Junseth from Bitcoin Uncensored will broadcast live from the Satoshi Roundtable!
So if you are interested --> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/47xl15/bitcoin_uncensored_at_the_satoshi_roundtable_live/
https://plus.google.com/events/cq4vj4n6ogqa7stsufh32rq1vkc?hl=en
Bruce Fenton is not amused.But hey, who gives a **ck right!
So if you are interested --> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/47xl15/bitcoin_uncensored_at_the_satoshi_roundtable_live/
https://plus.google.com/events/cq4vj4n6ogqa7stsufh32rq1vkc?hl=en
Bruce Fenton is not amused.But hey, who gives a **ck right!
Surely there is a lot of value to transparency; however, sometimes meaningful things will be accomplished when not on the public spotlight.
The comments on the linked thread does show that there is some mixed sentiments regarding whether attempting to "live" broadcast a private (and not public) meeting is a good idea, and certain potential downfalls of such attempts.
February 27, 2016, 04:18:13 PM
Chris Derose and Junseth from Bitcoin Uncensored will broadcast live from the Satoshi Roundtable!
So if you are interested --> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/47xl15/bitcoin_uncensored_at_the_satoshi_roundtable_live/
https://plus.google.com/events/cq4vj4n6ogqa7stsufh32rq1vkc?hl=en
Bruce Fenton is not amused.But hey, who gives a **ck right!
So if you are interested --> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/47xl15/bitcoin_uncensored_at_the_satoshi_roundtable_live/
https://plus.google.com/events/cq4vj4n6ogqa7stsufh32rq1vkc?hl=en
Bruce Fenton is not amused.But hey, who gives a **ck right!
February 27, 2016, 08:05:21 AM
Not making value judgements, just relaying information. If you believe that freemasons aren't an invidious, violent, pathologically controlling organisation then that's up to you. It's not universal that those qualities are reviled, but I guess you can choose your morals in much the same way as your allegiances.
Honestly brother, I respect your skeptical anti-Freemasonry. I don't know what kind of books you've been reading; I guess it wouldn't surprise me if Freemasons really did have an invidious [good word] past. But my Grandfather was a Freemason. The man was a butcher! I'm pretty sure it was a harmless sausage party.
But there were no private islands.
Joshua Zipkin of AMT is a Freemason.
John MacPherson AKA Horus of Cryptsy is a Freemason.
A good man I know here in Sandwich, IL, got the local serial liar (which said good man was well aware of, for he, too, joked at said liar's expense when dude wasn't present) to become a Freemason. BTW, the new Freemason is still the local serial liar - nothing changed except his stories became bigger, including how he (supposedly unknown to others) is fastly advancing through the ranks (leveling up) sharing supposed Masonic secrets while holding court at the local restaurant with the yokels.
Yeah, I they were both Godless atheists too. But not Communists.
Which conclusively proves that you can always trust a Communist.
P.S. Though it is a fact that Freemasons eat babies & have secs up the butt. That just ain't right.
February 27, 2016, 07:42:36 AM
What do you think should be covered?
A well defined process to reach Consensus in Bitcoin world.
What document(s) would be a good goal?
Bitcoin Constitution. Discussion: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-constitution-looking-for-feedback-1373985
This is definitely an awesome proposal. But, I doubt they'll discuss it at round-table, unless it is discussed thoroughly among dev community. A well defined process to reach Consensus in Bitcoin world.
What document(s) would be a good goal?
Bitcoin Constitution. Discussion: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-constitution-looking-for-feedback-1373985
February 27, 2016, 02:29:34 AM
https://www.facebook.com/bruce.fenton.page/posts/10153049785653001
Wow! Looks like Michael Toth isn't up to speed that Bruce has scaled back his participation to monthly pancake breakfasts.
Wow! Looks like Michael Toth isn't up to speed that Bruce has scaled back his participation to monthly pancake breakfasts.
February 26, 2016, 10:35:25 PM
Not making value judgements, just relaying information. If you believe that freemasons aren't an invidious, violent, pathologically controlling organisation then that's up to you. It's not universal that those qualities are reviled, but I guess you can choose your morals in much the same way as your allegiances.
Honestly brother, I respect your skeptical anti-Freemasonry. I don't know what kind of books you've been reading; I guess it wouldn't surprise me if Freemasons really did have an invidious [good word] past. But my Grandfather was a Freemason. The man was a butcher! I'm pretty sure it was a harmless sausage party.
But there were no private islands.
Joshua Zipkin of AMT is a Freemason.
John MacPherson AKA Horus of Cryptsy is a Freemason.
A good man I know here in Sandwich, IL, got the local serial liar (which said good man was well aware of, for he, too, joked at said liar's expense when dude wasn't present) to become a Freemason. BTW, the new Freemason is still the local serial liar - nothing changed except his stories became bigger, including how he (supposedly unknown to others) is fastly advancing through the ranks (leveling up) sharing supposed Masonic secrets while holding court at the local restaurant with the yokels.
Sounds moronic. But still harmless. IDK. Tell me he's a Scientologist I'll laugh my ass off. But it doesn't surprise me that a corporate type like Bruce should be a member of an outlandish mens club. It's probably good for business.
February 26, 2016, 10:30:58 PM
Not making value judgements, just relaying information. If you believe that freemasons aren't an invidious, violent, pathologically controlling organisation then that's up to you. It's not universal that those qualities are reviled, but I guess you can choose your morals in much the same way as your allegiances.
Honestly brother, I respect your skeptical anti-Freemasonry. I don't know what kind of books you've been reading; I guess it wouldn't surprise me if Freemasons really did have an invidious [good word] past. But my Grandfather was a Freemason. The man was a butcher! I'm pretty sure it was a harmless sausage party.
But there were no private islands.
Joshua Zipkin of AMT is a Freemason.
John MacPherson AKA Horus of Cryptsy is a Freemason.
A good man I know here in Sandwich, IL, got the local serial liar (which said good man was well aware of, for he, too, joked at said liar's expense when dude wasn't present) to become a Freemason. BTW, the new Freemason is still the local serial liar - nothing changed except his stories became bigger, including how he (supposedly unknown to others) is fastly advancing through the ranks (leveling up) sharing supposed Masonic secrets while holding court at the local restaurant with the yokels.
February 26, 2016, 09:31:27 PM
Not making value judgements, just relaying information. If you believe that freemasons aren't an invidious, violent, pathologically controlling organisation then that's up to you. It's not universal that those qualities are reviled, but I guess you can choose your morals in much the same way as your allegiances.
Honestly brother, I respect your skeptical anti-Freemasonry. I don't know what kind of books you've been reading; I guess it wouldn't surprise me if Freemasons really did have an invidious [good word] past. But my Grandfather was a Freemason. The man was a butcher! I'm pretty sure it was a harmless sausage party.
But there were no private islands.
February 26, 2016, 09:04:35 PM
Not making value judgements, just relaying information. If you believe that freemasons aren't an invidious, violent, pathologically controlling organisation then that's up to you. It's not universal that those qualities are reviled, but I guess you can choose your morals in much the same way as your allegiances.
February 26, 2016, 08:37:56 PM
Nope... I am not trying to defend Bruce at all. Bruce can defend himself, if he so chooses.
I am merely pointing out that you have the burden to outline relevance and to make any necessary connections with decent evidence (while not getting too far afield) and in essence, you failed to prove much if any aspect of your supposed case in terms of your presentation and possible substance and the inflammatory distractions inside whatever lame content that you did present.
I am merely pointing out that you have the burden to outline relevance and to make any necessary connections with decent evidence (while not getting too far afield) and in essence, you failed to prove much if any aspect of your supposed case in terms of your presentation and possible substance and the inflammatory distractions inside whatever lame content that you did present.
You literally didn't spend a single sentence talking about that, and you did write several paragraphs with something that sidled around presenting a case for Bruce's party at Sir Richard's carribean island, but never quite said it. Are you always so vague and meandering in all your own appraisals and diatribes equally, as I believe I was being quite to the point by simply stating that Bruce Fenton is a proud member of an organisation primarily associated with gangsterism.
Yes...
It's called reading comprehension, so hopefully, you can work on that a little bit..
I understand that you understand basic black and white concepts, such as Carlton good and Bruce bad, but bitcoin and its various relationships are much more subtle than your supposed simplified black and white attempt at depiction.
Jump to: