Author

Topic: SatoshiDICE.com - The World's Most Popular Bitcoin Game - page 215. (Read 495688 times)

donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
It really does make no difference because the numbers are truely random and are used only once for each game- you can't bet against another player, only against the house, so it wouldn't catch on.

Your argument is similar to saying that we don't need the 'red' bet on a roulette table, since there's no difference between 'red' and 'black'.

Mathematically that's true, but players like to feel like they have some control.  If you feel the lucky number is going to be high next time you play, wouldn't you like to be able to play "over 32767" instead of "lessthan 32768"?

And how many people would bet each way (both over and less than x) and think they have a fool proof way of beating the house? It might take over from martingale strategies.
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
It really does make no difference because the numbers are truely random and are used only once for each game- you can't bet against another player, only against the house, so it wouldn't catch on.

Your argument is similar to saying that we don't need the 'red' bet on a roulette table, since there's no difference between 'red' and 'black'.

Mathematically that's true, but players like to feel like they have some control.  If you feel the lucky number is going to be high next time you play, wouldn't you like to be able to play "over 32767" instead of "lessthan 32768"?
Ah nice - help people 'feel' better about their delusions Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
It really does make no difference because the numbers are truely random and are used only once for each game- you can't bet against another player, only against the house, so it wouldn't catch on.

Your argument is similar to saying that we don't need the 'red' bet on a roulette table, since there's no difference between 'red' and 'black'.

Mathematically that's true, but players like to feel like they have some control.  If you feel the lucky number is going to be high next time you play, wouldn't you like to be able to play "over 32767" instead of "lessthan 32768"?
member
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
It'd be interesting to let players bet on 'greater than'. At the moment to consistently win a player must repeatedly get below a certain threshold which is unlikely as lucky numbers are evenly distributed. If players could bet on 'red' as well as 'black' maybe you could exploit more players suffering from gamblers fallacies?

I'm not sure your wording would encourage anyone to run with your suggestion.

It really does make no difference because the numbers are truely random and are used only once for each game- you can't bet against another player, only against the house, so it wouldn't catch on.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
SD is fucked up AGAIN

every time i make a bet it tells me "tx ... cannot be spent" (i am using blockchain.info)

what the fuck does that even mean? all my previous transactions are confirmed! and i am including generous miner fees.

i don't get a payout until 1 confirmation, and even then there is a significant delay.

WHY WHY WHY

What size bet are you placing? Also, can you copy here a link of the transaction ID?
member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
[deleted]
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
It'd be interesting to let players bet on 'greater than'. At the moment to consistently win a player must repeatedly get below a certain threshold which is unlikely as lucky numbers are evenly distributed. If players could bet on 'red' as well as 'black' maybe you could exploit more players suffering from gamblers fallacies?

I'm not sure your wording would encourage anyone to run with your suggestion.
full member
Activity: 125
Merit: 100
It'd be interesting to let players bet on 'greater than'. At the moment to consistently win a player must repeatedly get below a certain threshold which is unlikely as lucky numbers are evenly distributed. If players could bet on 'red' as well as 'black' maybe you could exploit more players suffering from gamblers fallacies?
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
i include 0.01 miner fee, and all my prior transactions are confirmed.

[...]

here is another one:
https://blockchain.info/tx/484a19a838247b08b5bd9cd5d53704c339d325f55080f30cd9c1fdc38a76a14d

That one's input is confirmed in the same block as the bet itself.  This means that the bet's input wasn't confirmed when you sent it.

I would suggest breaking your 300 BTC input up into a bunch of smaller inputs.  Like send yourself 30 BTC ten times in the same transaction.  Then you won't be recycling the same brand-new 300 BTC input over and over.  Hopefully the client you use is smart enough to use confirmed inputs before new ones.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
it's only a 1BTC bet with 0.01 fee... no response... what the fuck?

I just looked at blockchain.info, picked a random satoshidice bet transaction, and looked it up.

The bet: http://blockchain.info/tx-index/48513265
The payout: http://blockchain.info/tx-index/48513287

Both are currenty unconfirmed, so they're definitely still paying out some unconfirmed bets.

I don't know why they're not processing your bets until they're confirmed.  It would be useful if you could look up a bet on their site and see its status even if it wasn't processed yet.  Possible statuses could be "waiting for confirmation due to insufficient tx fee" or "waiting for confirmation since not all inputs are confirmed".
sr. member
Activity: 293
Merit: 250
as you sent below the minimum bet yes, you will have to wait a while
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
I just gave it a spin, played x64 and won. No payment yet after 4 confirmations.
https://blockchain.info/es/tx/0116c393c8a7d78de301e69b3110428bff42e8f97d8f37b2cccf8a3344db0470

Will SD be forced to switch 1confirmation payments?

http://src.satoshidice.com/longpoll.php?tx=0116c393c8a7d78de301e69b3110428bff42e8f97d8f37b2cccf8a3344db0470
Lucky you  Wink

EDIT: With that lucky number you could have won the 249.861x (less than 256). 
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
I just gave it a spin, played x64 and won. No payment yet after 4 confirmations.
https://blockchain.info/es/tx/0116c393c8a7d78de301e69b3110428bff42e8f97d8f37b2cccf8a3344db0470

It looks to me like they paid you in the same block as you paid them.  That means they processed your bet before it was confirmed.
full member
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
I just gave it a spin, played x64 and won. No payment yet after 4 confirmations.
https://blockchain.info/es/tx/0116c393c8a7d78de301e69b3110428bff42e8f97d8f37b2cccf8a3344db0470

Will SD be forced to switch 1confirmation payments?
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
Looks like dice went down to 0.00534524 O_O

Buy up big - unless sd is completely broken (which I find very hard to believe) they'll be back over the red line in no time. You won't go broke investing in the house.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Looks like dice went down to 0.00534524 O_O

no ask wall... first "little" dump and price go down quickly
But 12h before the div ?

What the point ?

Sad Looks like someone has learned how to cheat satoshiDICE - made themselves BTC10,000+ - while causing disruptions for other players

Same player lost 15K 2 days before, for me it's ok, he can continue for life
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Looks like dice went down to 0.00534524 O_O
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Sad Looks like someone has learned how to cheat satoshiDICE - made themselves BTC10,000+ - while causing disruptions for other players
--'
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
0xFB0D8D1534241423
So, today all of my bets have had to be confirmed until they can be processed.  This is using the bitcoin client and the blockchain.info wallet.  Anybody know why this is?  It's kind of annoying to have to wait for a block to solve every time I want to play Sad
Pay a higher fee
Jump to: