Pages:
Author

Topic: Save the planet or not - page 38. (Read 40460 times)

hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
December 24, 2016, 02:35:27 PM
Countries whereby they cut down trees without planting new one can cause global warming, soil erosion which can damage the environment, so a lot of education especially the thirds world countries were you don't have proper enlightenment

I agree, deforestation is one of the main cost of global warming, soil erosion and even air pollution. Trees serves as the LUNGS of Mother Earth. Companies should replace  trees that were cut down with new ones, not only one but dozen making sure that there is a substitute incase the small tree will die. We should do reforestation so we can restore Earth's lungs. By reforestation we can mitigate Climate change. We can even prevent soil erosions and flash floods.

Right now, the vast majority of the global deforestation is occurring in a handful of tropical countries, such as Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, Congo.etc. The forests in these regions are cleared for the creation of Mahogany and Palm oil plantations. If the western nations stop importing palm oil and mahogany, then the deforestation will be reduced by a great amount.
You forgot to mention China. There are also very much cut down forests. I am sure that there are no appeals to reduce the use of palm oil will not lead to the result. This is a business and businessmen are not interested in what is happening somewhere.

You guys are missing the point.  It is not business, or palm oil demand that is the root cause.  The root cause is us.  Human population growth is directly responsible for the increased demand for all resources.
And what prevents those who cut down the forest for every felled tree to plant 2-3 new ones? In fact it is not so expensive. Just nobody wants it. Businessman from Europe or America is not interested in the forest in Asia. For them the main money.

Growing trees?  Do you know what are you talking about?  Growing trees takes decades.

Are you going to stop demand for resources for the next 50 years? How?
So what, decades? The forest is cut down for centuries and it is still there. The main thing required to restore the number of chopped trees. You have a bad arithmetic! If instead of 1 tree planting 3 no matter how much it grows.
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 100
December 24, 2016, 02:12:09 PM
Countries whereby they cut down trees without planting new one can cause global warming, soil erosion which can damage the environment, so a lot of education especially the thirds world countries were you don't have proper enlightenment

I agree, deforestation is one of the main cost of global warming, soil erosion and even air pollution. Trees serves as the LUNGS of Mother Earth. Companies should replace  trees that were cut down with new ones, not only one but dozen making sure that there is a substitute incase the small tree will die. We should do reforestation so we can restore Earth's lungs. By reforestation we can mitigate Climate change. We can even prevent soil erosions and flash floods.

Right now, the vast majority of the global deforestation is occurring in a handful of tropical countries, such as Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, Congo.etc. The forests in these regions are cleared for the creation of Mahogany and Palm oil plantations. If the western nations stop importing palm oil and mahogany, then the deforestation will be reduced by a great amount.
You forgot to mention China. There are also very much cut down forests. I am sure that there are no appeals to reduce the use of palm oil will not lead to the result. This is a business and businessmen are not interested in what is happening somewhere.

You guys are missing the point.  It is not business, or palm oil demand that is the root cause.  The root cause is us.  Human population growth is directly responsible for the increased demand for all resources.
And what prevents those who cut down the forest for every felled tree to plant 2-3 new ones? In fact it is not so expensive. Just nobody wants it. Businessman from Europe or America is not interested in the forest in Asia. For them the main money.
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 100
December 24, 2016, 01:47:05 PM
Countries whereby they cut down trees without planting new one can cause global warming, soil erosion which can damage the environment, so a lot of education especially the thirds world countries were you don't have proper enlightenment

I agree, deforestation is one of the main cost of global warming, soil erosion and even air pollution. Trees serves as the LUNGS of Mother Earth. Companies should replace  trees that were cut down with new ones, not only one but dozen making sure that there is a substitute incase the small tree will die. We should do reforestation so we can restore Earth's lungs. By reforestation we can mitigate Climate change. We can even prevent soil erosions and flash floods.

Right now, the vast majority of the global deforestation is occurring in a handful of tropical countries, such as Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, Congo.etc. The forests in these regions are cleared for the creation of Mahogany and Palm oil plantations. If the western nations stop importing palm oil and mahogany, then the deforestation will be reduced by a great amount.
You forgot to mention China. There are also very much cut down forests. I am sure that there are no appeals to reduce the use of palm oil will not lead to the result. This is a business and businessmen are not interested in what is happening somewhere.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
December 24, 2016, 01:13:40 PM
Countries whereby they cut down trees without planting new one can cause global warming, soil erosion which can damage the environment, so a lot of education especially the thirds world countries were you don't have proper enlightenment

I agree, deforestation is one of the main cost of global warming, soil erosion and even air pollution. Trees serves as the LUNGS of Mother Earth. Companies should replace  trees that were cut down with new ones, not only one but dozen making sure that there is a substitute incase the small tree will die. We should do reforestation so we can restore Earth's lungs. By reforestation we can mitigate Climate change. We can even prevent soil erosions and flash floods.

Right now, the vast majority of the global deforestation is occurring in a handful of tropical countries, such as Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, Congo.etc. The forests in these regions are cleared for the creation of Mahogany and Palm oil plantations. If the western nations stop importing palm oil and mahogany, then the deforestation will be reduced by a great amount.
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 100
December 24, 2016, 12:42:34 PM
Countries whereby they cut down trees without planting new one can cause global warming, soil erosion which can damage the environment, so a lot of education especially the thirds world countries were you don't have proper enlightenment

I agree, deforestation is one of the main cost of global warming, soil erosion and even air pollution. Trees serves as the LUNGS of Mother Earth. Companies should replace  trees that were cut down with new ones, not only one but dozen making sure that there is a substitute incase the small tree will die. We should do reforestation so we can restore Earth's lungs. By reforestation we can mitigate Climate change. We can even prevent soil erosions and flash floods.
Deforestation is a great evil. People don't think about saving the planet earth for their descendants. Not good to say so, but I'm waiting for a global war. Maybe this will help to reduce the number of people and will give some relax to Earth.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
December 24, 2016, 12:41:13 PM


Many years talk about global warming, pollution. What do you think about it? Can it be reversed?

Yes! we can reversed it really if the government is totally support the people who can fix the global warming like no using of plastic and burning them it maybe small but it really have a big effect on the earth i mean the smoke of it maybe very powerful and might cause heat and then the cutting of trees the government must announce to the people who cut trees for living that if they cut trees they must plant them as well for that our earth is still green again its very obvious that trees grow so slow but still in planting one tree you can save many lives from it and decrease the global warming and also the pollution i really believe that the government will really solve this global warming and pollution the government says the people will do Cheesy Smiley yes they can if they put it in the first list of what to to Cheesy
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
December 24, 2016, 12:32:04 PM
Countries whereby they cut down trees without planting new one can cause global warming, soil erosion which can damage the environment, so a lot of education especially the thirds world countries were you don't have proper enlightenment

I agree, deforestation is one of the main cost of global warming, soil erosion and even air pollution. Trees serves as the LUNGS of Mother Earth. Companies should replace  trees that were cut down with new ones, not only one but dozen making sure that there is a substitute incase the small tree will die. We should do reforestation so we can restore Earth's lungs. By reforestation we can mitigate Climate change. We can even prevent soil erosions and flash floods.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
December 24, 2016, 08:36:40 AM
70% of those who voted are leftists. Thus for sure mankind is doomed. But the planet will be doing just fine regardless.

I voted to save the planet. That doesn't mean that I am a leftist. If you check my post history, you can see that a lot of people here have accused me of harboring far-right ideology. I just want to preserve the planet for the future generations. I don't want my kids to suffer from the misdeeds of our generation. They also have a right to live on this planet.
sr. member
Activity: 297
Merit: 250
December 24, 2016, 12:23:38 AM
I have heard a word that "human beings do not need to save the earth, where the earth needs human beings to save, mankind is to save themselves". A taste of the demand and utilization of the boomerang lead us today, re education is not knowledge, but the concept of harmony with nature, comply with the law, protect the environment start from every little thing
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
December 23, 2016, 07:15:19 PM
70% of those who voted are leftists. Thus for sure mankind is doomed. But the planet will be doing just fine regardless.

Idiots.

Leftists don't care about mankind. They care about their self-importance, Volvos, and bike paths. And they are the most violent threat to freewill and mankind.

I am one of the 3 so far who voted "other". The "No" choices are all incorrect, because the planet doesn't need saving. We can do something to stop polluting our local environment, but the planet is perfectly happy with pollution.
member
Activity: 260
Merit: 10
December 23, 2016, 06:08:19 PM
Rapid depopulation would solve the problem for a while. Maybe even until we develop the technology to control our climate.

But how?  Undecided Huh
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1004
December 23, 2016, 03:21:27 PM
I would like to hear a viable solution to climate change, that would not throw developed countries like the US back into a 3rd world country. All climate change initiatives could barely skim the surface towards solving the supposed  "impending catastrophe"
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
December 23, 2016, 03:04:52 PM
Lol did you make a visual just for this thread? But to answer the question, you need to figure out if the damage is actually real....
sr. member
Activity: 303
Merit: 250
December 21, 2016, 11:14:36 AM
Everyone of us must cooperate. But the damage in our environment has been done. All we have to do now is to minimize the effect to our environment. But I doubt that all of us will cooperate. Bigtime business related people don't care what will happen to our environment. All they think is about their money. Thats the sad story.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 250
December 21, 2016, 09:52:40 AM
Let's just not care. The world will fix itself by destroying life as we know it. So lets just waste everything and let mother earth cleanse the world of all living things.
What about your grandchildren? Let the Earth kill them? You have done the trouble and they should pay for it? No, I think that people should demand from the government to reduce oil consumption. You need to get the world to switch to alternative energy sources.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
December 21, 2016, 09:46:05 AM


Many years talk about global warming, pollution. What do you think about it? Can it be reversed?

This shouldn't be a question about global warming or pollution, we all know these things don't make earth a better place so it should be what can we do to stop or at least control it because we only have one planet so everybody has the moral obligation to do their part may it be a little or a big one it doesn't matter because at the end of the day if we messed up our planet, every single person will be affected and our children's children generation would be living in a very different world if we don't start to make our things straight right now. And that's a shameful thing from us.
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
December 21, 2016, 09:25:35 AM
Let's just not care. The world will fix itself by destroying life as we know it. So lets just waste everything and let mother earth cleanse the world of all living things.
sr. member
Activity: 250
Merit: 250
December 21, 2016, 08:44:58 AM
You don't have to save the earth, the earth's temperature is now higher than tens of degrees

Don't exaggerate. The temperatures have increased by around one degree Celsius (with a higher increase occurring in the polar regions). But even this small change is causing a lot of damage to the environment.
Don't know where the temperature increases by 1 degree. In my country I don't see any changes. Actually increased slightly, the maximum temperature in summer and minimal winter temperature is decreased. On average, nothing has changed, and this year is even colder.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
December 21, 2016, 06:31:20 AM
You don't have to save the earth, the earth's temperature is now higher than tens of degrees

Don't exaggerate. The temperatures have increased by around one degree Celsius (with a higher increase occurring in the polar regions). But even this small change is causing a lot of damage to the environment.
sr. member
Activity: 264
Merit: 250
December 20, 2016, 11:47:03 PM
Environmental climate evolution, this is not the problem of human beings to save the earth, is the problem of human salvation, and save the earth is not related. You don't have to save the earth, the earth's temperature is now higher than tens of degrees when there are high concentrations of carbon dioxide now than when the earth 10 times are, the earth is so evolved, the destruction of the only species, only their own humanity, so is how humans save themselves, rather than the human how to save the earth.
Pages:
Jump to: