If you asked my opinion, it sounds like you are trying to delay getting sued until after the statute of limitations on your debts expires.
I have no idea if what your various investors claim they are owed by you are debts that a court will enforce, but my belief is they would if a lawsuit is filed within the statute of limitations. Your apparent intimidation elsewhere in this thread, and other history makes me believe that it would probably be best for any potential creditors to file a lawsuit sooner rather than later regarding any debts you may have defaulted on.
Many businesses fail every day. Don't invest what you can't afford to lose.
This does not absolve you of responsibility if you have personally promised to repay debts incurred operating a business.
Excellent post PrimeNumber7. I think when it comes to serial scammer Dean Nolan the pattern emerged over time is that he is a compulsive liar. He posts lies upon lies and hopes to distract people from the actual situation.
The ridiculous "
Many businesses fail every day. Don't invest what you can't afford to lose" line is not going to save him in any criminal or civil lawsuit. All it shows is the low-life serial scammer Dean Nolan cementing his position as the pathetic imbecile we all know him to be. Not all businesses have 50% of their ICO funds (over $3 million) stolen by the person trusted to operated the business therefore probably all businesses having that much stolen from them will fail.
Regarding him hoping to delay any action against until a statutory time limit has expired, that will not apply to this situation because he is a UK citizen holding a British passport and there is no such statutory time related issues in UK law.
The Proceed of Crime Act 2002 is the section of UK law (especially the money laundering part) which will most probably be used against him and a successful prosecution always leads to jail time.
In his recent post he boasts about his legal team telling he is not liable for anything and he will not go to jail. The only reason he would post that is because he fears a criminal or civil legal case so is trying to put doubt in the minds of potential instigators that any legal case will fail - but the reality is a legal case will see him at the very least interviewed by the Police as part of a criminal investigation and at the most him being found guilty and jailed for theft of over $3 million that belonged to investors.
The lowest of the low was the final 50+ BTC he stole and blamed it on an imaginary hack but never even reported the theft of $400,000+ to the Police. Pathetic. Now he tells victims he needs time to repay them just for classic misdirection in order to put doubt in minds about holding off reporting him to the Police
On of the other issues about victims wanting to report the matter to the Police is that some might be thinking that they will have to explain to the Police where they got the funds to invest and it might mean tax implications. First of all, they do not have to worry about reporting the matter to the Police. The Police will are not interested in the tax aspect of where the funds came from, they are interested in arresting and prosecuting criminals.
My case file is complete with evidence of the lies serial scammer Dean Nolan told on a regular basis. All I need is just one investor to say they are willing to report him to the Police then I will hand over everything to the UK Police myself while the victim can wait for the outcome of the criminal investigation to find out whether serial scammer Dean Nolan will get jail time and what assets were seized - and how much of their stolen funds they can expect to get back.
Here is another excellent post from marlboroza on betking and how serial scammer Dean Nolan stole $2.785 million from the 30 million BKB he stole by saying it was going to be used to on the website but he accidentally posted he was going to steal it:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.44790903He archived it and the content is one of several key reasons why a criminal prosecution is likely to go ahead:
http://archive.is/9opwz#selection-6385.4-6385.34This is all you need to read:
http://archive.is/9opwz#selection-6385.4-6385.34I'm buying tokens back with my own profit, the 30 million tokens I keep from the ICO.
There's not going to be any significant reduction in bankroll, max 10% every 3 months.
Yes I will then be making a profit on the tokens I hold, the ones not being sold plus the ones I buy back, that's pretty normal and how most businesses work.
There's no dilution going on at all.
According to ICO conditions (someone archived ICO long time ago, couldn't archive new site)
http://archive.is/tdcWr#selection-440.5-440.6Distribution
– 100,000,000 BetKing Bankroll Tokens will be created as Ethereum ERC23 tokens and issued after the crowdsale ends.
– 70 million will be available for sale to crowdsale participants.
– 30 million will be retained by BetKing for ICO bounties, testing bounties, advisors, hiring, future marketing and development.
– BetKing Bankroll Tokens can be purchased with Bitcoin, Ethereum and Litecoin. All funds will be held in cold storage.
Use of funds raised
After the crowdsale at least 50% of the funds raised will be used for the house bankroll that players bet against and winnings are paid from.The remaining funds will be used for marketing, promos, seo, design, development, server costs and legal.
Is Dean allowed to use his 30% of issued tokens to buy back tokens, to put them on exchange, sell them or to put them in bankroll, as during ICO something completely different was stated?
Read again:
30 million will be retained by BetKing for ICO bounties, testing bounties, advisors, hiring, future marketing and development.
I'm buying tokens back with my own profit, the 30 million tokens I keep from the ICO