Scammer - HashKing - page 3. | Bitcointalksearch.org

hashking

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: JoelKatz on September 11, 2012, 04:27:46 PM

Quote from: hashking on September 11, 2012, 04:26:20 PM

This conditions were in effect as long as the business was viable. This business has closed its doors and is trying to make good as best it can.

Right, so you are *not* going to honor the insurance. That was my point. I'm glad we agree.

Quote

If you guys keep acting like this I will just walk away.

That's childish and dishonest.

I told everyone I was working on trying to get everyone paid out. Your fucking attitude is childish. You keep attacking me over and over again with the same thing.

JoelKatz

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1012

Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.

Quote from: hashking on September 11, 2012, 04:26:20 PM

This conditions were in effect as long as the business was viable. This business has closed its doors and is trying to make good as best it can.

Right, so you are *not* going to honor the insurance. That was my point. I'm glad we agree.

Quote

If you guys keep acting like this I will just walk away.

That's childish and dishonest.

hashking

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: wachtwoord on September 11, 2012, 04:21:10 PM

No. It said insured according to the conditions stated in the thread. So a 24 hour withdrawal period. That is the condition I agreed to.

You cannot keep the 24-hour time frame but you have the moral obligation to be as close to it as possible.

This conditions were in effect as long as the business was viable. This business has closed its doors and is trying to make good as best it can. If you guys keep acting like this I will just walk away.

greyhawk

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 1009

Quote from: hashking on September 11, 2012, 04:16:01 PM

Everyone who invested were ok with the terms as they were.

Quote

... so I went ahead and deposited 20 BTC to that adress. Good evening, gentlemen.

wachtwoord

legendary

Activity: 2324

Merit: 1125

No. It said insured according to the conditions stated in the thread. So a 24 hour withdrawal period. That is the condition I agreed to.

You cannot keep the 24-hour time frame but you have the moral obligation to be as close to it as possible.

JoelKatz

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1012

Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.

Quote from: hashking on September 11, 2012, 04:16:01 PM

I really didn't state a time frame the insurance or guaranteed part would be returned by. I can take 10 years if I wanted. Everyone who invested were ok with the terms as they were.

You might wish to look up the definition of "insurance". The crux of full insurance is that a person is made no worse off by a covered loss. Not having access to your money for ten years is worse than having immediate access to it.

hashking

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: theymos on September 11, 2012, 03:51:24 PM

Did the investors of the 3.3% option get their 50% back yet? That should have been paid out, since the insurance amount was supposed to be sitting in an address waiting for a Pirate default.

There's no problem with the direct passthrough.

For the sub-3.3% accounts, I'm feeling the same way as BadBear...

Quote from: BadBear on September 11, 2012, 12:37:08 PM

The insurance is iffy, because the terms of insurance were never clearly stated, if it was backed by mining then it's natural it will take a while, if people weren't happy with that they should have pushed for more clear terms/timeline of repayment of insured funds.

Maybe 3 years is too unreasonable for a "guaranteed" deposit account, though? I'm not sure. Is there any legal precedent for this kind of thing?

I really didn't state a time frame the insurance or guaranteed part would be returned by. I can take 10 years if I wanted. Everyone who invested were ok with the terms as they were.

theymos

administrator

Activity: 5222

Merit: 13032

Did the investors of the 3.3% option get their 50% back yet? That should have been paid out, since the insurance amount was supposed to be sitting in an address waiting for a Pirate default.

There's no problem with the direct passthrough.

For the sub-3.3% accounts, I'm feeling the same way as BadBear...

Quote from: BadBear on September 11, 2012, 12:37:08 PM

The insurance is iffy, because the terms of insurance were never clearly stated, if it was backed by mining then it's natural it will take a while, if people weren't happy with that they should have pushed for more clear terms/timeline of repayment of insured funds.

Maybe 3 years is too unreasonable for a "guaranteed" deposit account, though? I'm not sure. Is there any legal precedent for this kind of thing?

BadBear

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1127

I think that says it all, he responds within 30 seconds to troll Micon but can't even answer my simple question.

FLHippy

full member

Activity: 784

Merit: 101

Quote from: repentance on September 11, 2012, 02:38:06 AM

Y'all might want to read this.

Quote from: hashking

I'm only 15 so that is the reason he probably has more sense then me.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1180141

Hashking,
You've been a very naughty boy. Now go back down to the basement and stay out of trouble.

Everyone,
Bitcoin Investing is going to be an alternate definition on Dictionary.com for Fraud someday Sad

fraud/frôd/
Noun:
1. Wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain.
2. A person or thing intended to deceive others, typically by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments or qualities.
3. ALL BitCoin investments.

BadBear

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1127

Quote from: hashking on September 11, 2012, 01:33:03 PM

Quote from: Micon on September 11, 2012, 01:32:31 PM

Hashking is a scammer +1

Micon is a horrible poker player +1.

Why don't you answer my question instead of trolling? It certainly isn't helping your case.

Quote from: BadBear on September 11, 2012, 01:22:26 PM

Quote from: hashking on September 11, 2012, 01:17:49 PM

The 50% insured was for my 3.3% weekly program. I had very few signup for that. The 6.91% program was direct Pirate exposure. Anything less then the 3.3% was insured and that is what I'm working on paying off.

Were the lower tier deposits with Pirate as well?

Puppet

legendary

Activity: 980

Merit: 1040

Quote from: hashking on September 11, 2012, 01:33:03 PM

Quote from: Micon on September 11, 2012, 01:32:31 PM

Hashking is a scammer +1

Micon is a horrible poker player +1.

Even if he is, at least he plays poker with his own money, not with chips fraudulently borrowed from others.
Why dont you spend your time more productive by returning your lenders money or working to gather it?

hashking

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: Micon on September 11, 2012, 01:32:31 PM

Hashking is a scammer +1

Micon is a horrible poker player +1.

Micon

legendary

Activity: 1232

Merit: 1014

FPV Drone Pilot

Hashking is a scammer +1

BadBear

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1127

Quote from: hashking on September 11, 2012, 01:17:49 PM

The 50% insured was for my 3.3% weekly program. I had very few signup for that. The 6.91% program was direct Pirate exposure. Anything less then the 3.3% was insured and that is what I'm working on paying off.

Were the lower tier deposits with Pirate as well?

PsychoticBoy

donator

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1010

Parental Advisory Explicit Content

Pay up man, the GUARANTEED deposit should be in your wallet so send them out!!!

hashking

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

The 50% insured was for my 3.3% weekly program. I had very few signup for that. The 6.91% program was direct Pirate exposure. Anything less then the 3.3% was insured and that is what I'm working on paying off.

Coinoisseur

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: vampire on September 11, 2012, 08:15:03 AM

Quote from: greyhawk on September 11, 2012, 08:01:21 AM

Kluge is an unemployed do-nothing with debts up the wazoo. Not the best reference.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/in-fairly-dire-need-of-a-25k-usd-loan-108711

Here goes an another "trustworthy" member. I will stick to my original moto - I don't trust anyone.

Should be noted that Kluge so far has been far more open to the community than many of these other people.

BadBear

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1127

greyhawk

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 1009

Quote from: Puppet on September 11, 2012, 12:39:54 PM

definately not at pirate, since he was insuring against pirate default.

Ah yes, the wonderful world of BTC insurances.

Like CPA insuring against pirate default by financing themselves through Pirate PPTs.

Topic: Scammer - HashKing - page 3. (Read 9987 times)