Pages:
Author

Topic: Scammer - HashKing - page 4. (Read 10069 times)

legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
September 11, 2012, 11:39:54 AM
#26
Did hashking ever specifically say the lower interest rate accounts weren't exposed to Pirate? He said they were used for other borrowers, which could include Pirate. I did see it was asked a couple times in his thread but he never answered, not publicly anyway, that I can see.

1.00% Weekly -- Guaranteed Fully Insured no lock in
 
1.25% Weekly -- Guaranteed Fully Insured 8 week lock in

3.30% Weekly -- Direct BTCST Pass Through 50% Insurance 1 week lock in (CLOSED)
Thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1068849

If you click the last link, you will se he promised insurance was in a wallet, definately not at pirate, since he was insuring against pirate default.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1128
September 11, 2012, 11:37:08 AM
#25
Did hashking ever specifically say the lower interest rate accounts weren't exposed to Pirate? He said they were used for other borrowers, which could include Pirate. I did see it was asked a couple times in his thread but he never answered, not publicly anyway, that I can see.
I haven't dig thru his entire thread, but what about the part where he said INSURED and withdraw within 24 hrs?
HK clearly didn't live up to that.

I agree, but more evidence of deceit never hurt. Would certainly expedite things. The insurance is iffy, because the terms of insurance were never clearly stated, if it was backed by mining then it's natural it will take a while, if people weren't happy with that they should have pushed for more clear terms/timeline of repayment of insured funds.
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1452
September 11, 2012, 11:29:47 AM
#24
I'm pissed off. Seriously, I was getting 1,25% while my funds were exposed to pirate? Are you fucking kidding me? I could have gotten 7% weekly on those same funds if I wanted, with exactly the same risks. And here I thought I was diversifying my investments...

how does that make you feel? This scum bag was using your money which was supposed to be for a low risk investment, turning around and putting it into an extremely high risk investment and making 5.5% interest off of you. That right there my friend is a blatant flat out scam.


hes a scumbag, a liar and a scammer - now where is the tag?



free market at its best
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1005
September 11, 2012, 11:27:17 AM
#23
Did hashking ever specifically say the lower interest rate accounts weren't exposed to Pirate? He said they were used for other borrowers, which could include Pirate. I did see it was asked a couple times in his thread but he never answered, not publicly anyway, that I can see.
I haven't dig thru his entire thread, but what about the part where he said INSURED and withdraw within 24 hrs?
HK clearly didn't live up to that.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1128
September 11, 2012, 08:08:16 AM
#22
Did hashking ever specifically say the lower interest rate accounts weren't exposed to Pirate? He said they were used for other borrowers, which could include Pirate. I did see it was asked a couple times in his thread but he never answered, not publicly anyway, that I can see.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
September 11, 2012, 07:15:03 AM
#21
Kluge is an unemployed do-nothing with debts up the wazoo. Not the best reference.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/in-fairly-dire-need-of-a-25k-usd-loan-108711

Here goes an another "trustworthy" member. I will stick to my original moto - I don't trust anyone.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
September 11, 2012, 07:01:21 AM
#20
Would that surprise you?

Nope. But Kluge was recommending him, there goes any trust around here.


Kluge is an unemployed do-nothing with debts up the wazoo. Not the best reference.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/in-fairly-dire-need-of-a-25k-usd-loan-108711
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
September 11, 2012, 06:58:10 AM
#19
Would that surprise you?

Nope. But Kluge was recommending him, there goes any trust around here.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
September 11, 2012, 06:55:02 AM
#18
Would that surprise you?
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
September 11, 2012, 06:53:27 AM
#17
Y'all might want to read this.

Quote from: hashking
I'm only 15 so that is the reason he probably has more sense then me.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1180141

WTF?

So this thread was a complete lie?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/i-am-looking-to-borrow-10000-btc-to-expand-my-current-bussiness-75480
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
September 11, 2012, 01:38:06 AM
#16
Y'all might want to read this.

Quote from: hashking
I'm only 15 so that is the reason he probably has more sense then me.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1180141
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
September 10, 2012, 10:57:16 PM
#15
The insurance will pay back over 3 (30?) years. Caveat Emptor, indeed.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
0xFB0D8D1534241423
September 10, 2012, 08:59:21 PM
#14
Since I have seen evidence that the mining farm that was used to back the insurance exists, it doesn't appear to me that any scam took place. Next time, invest in programs where the insurance pays out faster.
Now we wait; I doubt he'll stick around. Same stalling tactics as pirate.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
September 10, 2012, 08:52:26 PM
#13
Since I have seen evidence that the mining farm that was used to back the insurance exists, it doesn't appear to me that any scam took place. Next time, invest in programs where the insurance pays out faster.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
September 10, 2012, 07:12:16 PM
#12
I want to add that I do not understand the compulsive nature of people to address a binary scammer/non-scammer indicator on everyone.

He didn't hold his end of the bargain but there are several ways he can handle it now all with different relative fairness ratings. For me, giving him a scammer rating serves no purpose whatsoever.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
September 10, 2012, 07:04:16 PM
#11
Initial PM sent.
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
September 10, 2012, 06:53:28 PM
#10
Mining equipment.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
September 10, 2012, 06:49:01 PM
#9
Who/what backed the "insurance"? Did he ever say?
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 500
September 10, 2012, 01:44:30 PM
#8
Lending to pirate was a legal option?!, but the hard part is that he he guaranteed the investment (but didn't do it....).



legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
September 10, 2012, 01:38:58 PM
#7
What did u believe a Pirate Pass Throu was for?
It wasn't supposed to be a PPT though.

"The funds for the deposits will be used for lending out to other borrowers, investing in more mining equipment, bitcoin projects and other investments offered on the forum. ... All my depositers funds are 100% guaranteed and will not lose any funds due to any defaults unless stated otherwise."

The funds that provided this "100% guarantee" were actually "invested" with Pirate. Thus the claim that they will not lose any funds due to default was fraudulent. Pirate defaulted. The depositors lost funds.
Pages:
Jump to: