Schumer....is that Italian?
Feinstein is I think....
Feinstein is I think....
This is America. Everybody came from somewhere one day, like the US president...
Topic: Schumer: It’s time to go after the 3-D printable guns - page 6. (Read 4397 times)
This is America. Everybody came from somewhere one day, like the US president...
Schumer....is that Italian?
Feinstein is I think....
Feinstein is I think....
This is America. Everybody came from somewhere one day, like the US president...
Schumer....is that Italian?
Feinstein is I think....
Feinstein is I think....
This is America. Everybody came from somewhere one day, like the US president...
Schumer....is that Italian?
Feinstein is I think....
Feinstein is I think....
Today this thread became reality.
Since you can use one 3d printer to make most of the parts for another 3d printer, a ban on them would be pretty futile. One of the goals of the open source 3d printers is to be able to print a printer.
Relevant:
http://craphound.com/?p=573
Since you can use one 3d printer to make most of the parts for another 3d printer, a ban on them would be pretty futile. One of the goals of the open source 3d printers is to be able to print a printer.
MakerBot.com makes it impossible to even ban the 3D printer itself as it is open source. It is a "crude" machine as of now but...
ya, bans didn't work well for alcohol and now drugs. i'm worried more that it will hold back the technology. i mean look at how far 3d printing has progressed just in the last few years, think where it'll be 30-40 years from now if it remains unhindered. if it keeps advancing at its current rate, it's entirely possible that a 3d printer could become a household item and revolutionize how we buy products.
who knows what the future will hold, but its a technology with so much potential. i'd hate to have its advancement stopped by something as silly as big brother protection.
That's one of the major problems with government, the way they hold back technology and human progress. I first began to notice this back in the late 90's, which was when I first began to wonder about the story we are told when we are young about government. It being there for the good of us all and all that.
There's no way they are going to hold it back ultimately of course, but how much damage are they going to do in the interim period?
It will also be interesting to see how it develops in places other than the USA. At least there is a kind of gun culture there. Try even bringing up the topic of citizens owning guns in Australia and watch people completely freak. Yes, we are that brainwashed. It even took a while for me to break the brainwashing. It is just that effective.
The last thing someone in power wants to do is allow the 99% easy weaponry. You don't conquer a people by arming them. You first take control of the most expensive military in the world, and then use it against anyone who disagrees with you. It's hard to do that when those people who disagree have the ability to fight back. It's hard to look like the good guy when you can't rush to someone's rescue, someone you've disarmed without them knowing you've disarmed them. You don't give people weapons; otherwise, they might get the idea that they can defend themselves. They might even collaborate against you, the guy in charge--madness! What fool on top would allow this? Divide and conquer: repeat after me. Divide and conquer.
as this technology progresses it will be covered more and more by the media. they'll use fear tactics to promote regulation on it and then eventually (after a major crime is committed with a printed weapon) they'll probably use it as an excuse to ban the technology (atleast for non-corporate use).
Good luck enforcing that ban.
ya, bans didn't work well for alcohol and now drugs. i'm worried more that it will hold back the technology. i mean look at how far 3d printing has progressed just in the last few years, think where it'll be 30-40 years from now if it remains unhindered. if it keeps advancing at its current rate, it's entirely possible that a 3d printer could become a household item and revolutionize how we buy products.
who knows what the future will hold, but its a technology with so much potential. i'd hate to have its advancement stopped by something as silly as big brother protection.
as this technology progresses it will be covered more and more by the media. they'll use fear tactics to promote regulation on it and then eventually (after a major crime is committed with a printed weapon) they'll probably use it as an excuse to ban the technology (atleast for non-corporate use).
Good luck enforcing that ban.
Someone needs to encode the CAD file into the blockchain.
as this technology progresses it will be covered more and more by the media. they'll use fear tactics to promote regulation on it and then eventually (after a major crime is committed with a printed weapon) they'll probably use it as an excuse to ban the technology (atleast for non-corporate use).
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/07/schumer-its-time-to-go-after-the-3-d-printable-guns/
The senator also proposed updating the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 — which bans guns that can defeat airport security metal detectors — to include printable gun magazines. Defense Distributed has a federal firearms manufacturers license, which Wilson sought after being questioned by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in 2012. That was shortly after a 3-D printer Wilson had rented was seized by its manufacturer over worries he’d violate the Undetectable Firearms Act. The law, which is set to expire this year, exempts licensed manufacturers to produce plastic guns for use as a models and prototypes.
“There’s no reason for a rifle receiver or a magazine to be, quote unquote, detectable,” Wilson says. “And to make this even worse, they’ll say: well it’s okay for manufacturers to make an undetectable receiver, but it’s just not okay for you to make it. It’s an attempt to regulate some gun parts under the guise of security.”
The senator also proposed updating the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 — which bans guns that can defeat airport security metal detectors — to include printable gun magazines. Defense Distributed has a federal firearms manufacturers license, which Wilson sought after being questioned by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms in 2012. That was shortly after a 3-D printer Wilson had rented was seized by its manufacturer over worries he’d violate the Undetectable Firearms Act. The law, which is set to expire this year, exempts licensed manufacturers to produce plastic guns for use as a models and prototypes.
“There’s no reason for a rifle receiver or a magazine to be, quote unquote, detectable,” Wilson says. “And to make this even worse, they’ll say: well it’s okay for manufacturers to make an undetectable receiver, but it’s just not okay for you to make it. It’s an attempt to regulate some gun parts under the guise of security.”
Jump to: