Author

Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 419. (Read 845654 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 30, 2014, 07:28:16 PM
Look's interesting, but unless you know the ACTUAL event's involved in the initiations..?

So on the 'Eve' of woman learning the truth, by biting from the tree of knowledge, she learnt a truth she could not handle. Hence the aftermath. This is the significance of the cat. The apple is the PASSWORD that, if you survive the test, get's you your gold star.

No, she learned that there are consequences for disobeying God. But she also learned that God was willing to take care of her, and fix the consequences. But she would have to do it God's way... through pain in this life, and death.

She will be raised to a new life with God in the new heavens and new earth He will create.

Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 250
October 30, 2014, 07:23:36 PM
Look's interesting, but unless you know the ACTUAL event's involved in the initiations..?

So on the 'Eve' of woman learning the truth, by biting from the tree of knowledge, she learnt a truth she could not handle. Hence the aftermath. This is the significance of the cat. The apple is the PASSWORD that, if you survive the test, get's you your gold star.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 250
October 30, 2014, 07:14:42 PM
Well, as for Apple and Eve..

Did Eve really take a bite from 'that' apple (tree)?

What she actually did was take a bite from the tree of knowledge.

Another kicker: The pyramid's were not tomb's. The were initiation 'building's' for the right's of initiation, which at one point were for man alone. What ACTUALLY happened is written in the bible in all it's glory.. but perception can be a fickle thing..

Allow me to take you on a tour. We stand at the entrance to the pyramid. You have not eaten, or drank.. you have 'fasted'. Ladies first: After you. When you enter the pyramid, you have went 3 day's without food or drink. Once you are inside, you need to find the sarcophigus, cause I just rolled a massive bolder in front of your only way out. You are on your own. Your Task: Get to sarcophigi, and lay down in it. Soon, anubis, or your version of said character, will come and lead you from your body as you die. The question is, which 'chamber' are you in?

The King's chamber?

The Queen's chamber?

Or the underground cave, with the passage that end's in a wall (of light, for those i the know)

As your soul raise's itself from your body, anubis guide's you to the place we can all get to NOW, and on the way you pass a grove of tree's. you are raised above the earth, and learn all worldly thing's etc.. I wait the alotted time, and move said boulder. You (if you lived through the test) will be asked one question.

What did you see?

A grove of APPLE tree's. (Avalon)

A cat..

And a spider.

Done at what is now known as 'EASTER'

Again.. the scource of all, but you never did try this out on yourself in your own dark space, did you?

So after hitting the 13th pillar, the princess was buried.. at avalon.

Go figure.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
October 30, 2014, 07:11:48 PM
And the Bible is the only place we see a clear picture of how God created the whole universe.

Smiley

not true^

I just finished the Bhagavad Gita today, and its rendition was pretty clear (to me).

I'm sure there are more stories.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 30, 2014, 06:57:37 PM
Oh man.. not at all, whatever made ya think that? God? pmsl..




You know about those little boxed kids drinks, you know the kind, the ones that come in, say, 8-paks, with little straws attached to the sides of each individual box? Well there's one of those drinks that has a logo, right in the middle of the pack, near the top, that's sort of curved. And it says "Apple and Eve."

Smiley

So let be guess, the apple was bent, and there was most defo sumat fishy about eve (constellation pisces)

Well, I don't expect that anybody knows the shape of the apple, but there is one drink company out there that is trying to remind the kids about where all this came from. The only place we see a clear, precise, concise, meaningful description of "apple and Eve" is in the Bible. And the Bible is the only place we see a clear picture of how God created the whole universe.

Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 250
October 30, 2014, 06:50:19 PM
Oh man.. not at all, whatever made ya think that? God? pmsl..




You know about those little boxed kids drinks, you know the kind, the ones that come in, say, 8-paks, with little straws attached to the sides of each individual box? Well there's one of those drinks that has a logo, right in the middle of the pack, near the top, that's sort of curved. And it says "Apple and Eve."

Smiley

So let be guess, the apple was bent, and there was most defo sumat fishy about eve (constellation pisces)
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 30, 2014, 06:41:07 PM
Oh man.. not at all, whatever made ya think that? God? pmsl..




You know about those little boxed kids drinks, you know the kind, the ones that come in, say, 8-paks, with little straws attached to the sides of each individual box? Well there's one of those drinks that has a logo, right in the middle of the pack, near the top, that's sort of curved. And it says "Apple and Eve."

Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 250
October 30, 2014, 06:32:30 PM
Oh man.. not at all, whatever made ya think that? God? pmsl..


legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 30, 2014, 06:27:18 PM
Cant we just take a hint out of all other lifeform's book, and just live, instead of caring about who created what?

What? Now you want to lock this thread?

Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 250
October 30, 2014, 05:19:52 PM
Cant we just take a hint out of all other lifeform's book, and just live, instead of caring about who created what?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 30, 2014, 04:42:05 PM
. . .

Code:
∀x[nothing(x) ⇒ everything(¬x)] ∧ ∀x[quantity(x) ⇒ ¬x ≔ −x] ⇒ ∀x[nothing(x, quantity) ∧ x ≔ 0 ⇒ everything(¬x, quantity) ∧ ¬x ≔ −0] ⇒ −0 ÷ {x | x ∈ ℝ ∨ x ∈ ℂ} = −0

That, is nothing more than man made nonsense (letter's n number's) which mean nothing in a formless world. This world, and all in it, only have form because we have been 'shown' it by said light, without that light, what we ALL wrote mean's nothing..

Here's the transliteration:

If
Quote
If
Quote
For all x, if
Quote
x is 'nothing.'
is true, then opposite x is 'everything.'
is true and
Quote
For all x, if
Quote
x is 'quantity.'
is true, then opposite x is negative x.
is true, then for all x, if
Quote
x is 'quantity' of 'nothing.'
is true and
Quote
x is zero.
is true then, opposite x is 'everything' of 'quantity' and opposite x is negative zero.
is true, then negative zero divided by x—such that x is an element of the set of all real numbers or an element of the set of all complex numbers—equals negative zero.

Except when talking about people, that is. Man is opposite of woman, and woman is opposite of man. But when you put them together, they don't cancel out to zero. Rather they multiply into children.

 Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
October 30, 2014, 04:06:24 PM
. . .

Code:
∀x[nothing(x) ⇒ everything(¬x)] ∧ ∀x[quantity(x) ⇒ ¬x ≔ −x] ⇒ ∀x[nothing(x, quantity) ∧ x ≔ 0 ⇒ everything(¬x, quantity) ∧ ¬x ≔ −0] ⇒ −0 ÷ {x | x ∈ ℝ ∨ x ∈ ℂ} = −0

That, is nothing more than man made nonsense (letter's n number's) which mean nothing in a formless world. This world, and all in it, only have form because we have been 'shown' it by said light, without that light, what we ALL wrote mean's nothing..

Here's the transliteration:

If
Quote
If
Quote
For all x, if
Quote
x is 'nothing.'
is true, then opposite x is 'everything.'
is true and
Quote
For all x, if
Quote
x is 'quantity.'
is true, then opposite x is negative x.
is true, then for all x, if
Quote
x is 'quantity' of 'nothing.'
is true and
Quote
x is zero.
is true then, opposite x is 'everything' of 'quantity' and opposite x is negative zero.
is true, then negative zero divided by x—such that x is an element of the set of all real numbers or an element of the set of all complex numbers—equals negative zero.
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 250
October 30, 2014, 03:21:15 PM
That, is nothing more than man made nonsense (letter's n number's) which mean nothing in a formless world. This world, and all in it, only have form because we have been 'shown' it by said light, without that light, what we ALL wrote mean's nothing..
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
October 30, 2014, 03:15:18 PM
I'm very sceptical of anyone who think's it's cool to talk about God, but wont acknowledge him, in the form of 'G-d', yet you use the full word 'Devil'.. why dont you's who do this say the word GOD?

Why are you so afraid of 'O'?

This is more than a valid question, for there are many religious 'sect's', or 'cult's' who are nothing more than religioun's. To be a member of a religion, you must believe in god or his/her opposing factor. What are you afraid of, creating the 'graven image'? Answer - YES. This 'graven image' is not the letter O, the number 0, but the LOOP, where life repeat's itself in all it's guise's, this would be the EVIDENCE of god full stop. But no-one will accept this. It's like, not quite a donut shape, or a toroid, but akin to these shape's, it's more like a loop where we discover everything in existance fit's into the smallest space that no microscope can see, even the hydron collector has problem's with it, for scientist's are 'seeing' a third light created when splitting a light particle and sending it (them) through two slot's, and when this happen's, it has been noted that there APPEAR'S a third light particle, yet everytime the scientist's attempt to record ths FACT, they cannot. They can see it for sure. They know it happen's every time they test.. but try recording it using camera's, or any scientific equipment as advanced as even the hydron collector, nope, they cant. They can see it with their own eye's, as can we if we had that type of access, but we cannot 'scientifically' prove what we see. We can agree, debate, argue, go fuckin insane, but we KNOW we can see the 3rd light, that, according to all our knowledge, CANNOT, but does, exist. Allow me to remix 'Thou shalt not create any graven image' - Thoust CANT create any graven image, ha, fuckin ha. This is proof of an intelligence that allow's us 'seeing', but NOT recording, said graven image, and lol, the FACT that this 'image' is nothing more than light. Or as I stated in earlier post's, the test equipment cannot record it, because they have not been made to. By design? Who know's Wink

This thread has provided more than enough evidence for the proof of god in the following format:

'Proof' is regarded as accepted by many, as it was before any electronic gadjet's were made to provide scientific proof, in the form of test equipment or the like. By splitting one light particle into two, and as they pass through the 'card' with the two slot's in it, the third light is produced.

Religion cannot really be used in this 'search', for no matter what one religion 'MAY' accept as proof, another will decry it as nonsense, despite the fact, 'Seeing is believing'.

I on my own provided more evidence using nothing more than my own head, and the fact that knowledge is wisdom, and far superior to any book conceived by man.. after all, just like the hydron collector, the religious book's only tell us what they want us to see, using nothing more than what is, at best, hearsay.

Do your search for the creative thought that grew in the abyss (of time - time is the abyss), for time existed before the creation spoken of in said book's.. This creative thought, is the first action of the mind that allow's us to form the word'(s) we speak. The thought come's from this 'chaos' (dunno why they call nothing, chaos) and vibrate's becoming the sound this diety used to speak the word's 'let there be light'. Look outside. How does all that fit in your head? It cant.

Because it's not up there.. Only when you learn to become 'formless' will you know the truth of what is written in this post alone. Accept it or not, this is the story of creation in it's simplest form.

Your just not allowed to record it.

Code:
∀x[nothing(x) ⇒ everything(¬x)] ∧ ∀x[quantity(x) ⇒ ¬x ≔ −x] ⇒ ∀x[nothing(x, quantity) ∧ x ≔ 0 ⇒ everything(¬x, quantity) ∧ ¬x ≔ −0] ⇒ −0 ÷ {x | x ∈ ℝ ∨ x ∈ ℂ} = −0
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 250
October 30, 2014, 02:55:06 PM
I'm very sceptical of anyone who think's it's cool to talk about God, but wont acknowledge him, in the form of 'G-d', yet you use the full word 'Devil'.. why dont you's who do this say the word GOD?

Why are you so afraid of 'O'?

This is more than a valid question, for there are many religious 'sect's', or 'cult's' who are nothing more than religion's. To be a member of a religion, you must believe in god or his/her opposing factor. What are you afraid of, creating the 'graven image'? Answer - YES. This 'graven image' is not the letter O, the number 0, but the LOOP, where life repeat's itself in all it's guise's, this would be the EVIDENCE of god full stop. But no-one will accept this. It's like, not quite a donut shape, or a toroid, but akin to these shape's, it's more like a loop where we discover everything in existance fit's into the smallest space that no microscope can see, even the hydron collector has problem's with it, for scientist's are 'seeing' a third light created when splitting a light particle and sending it (them) through two slot's, and when this happen's, it has been noted that there APPEAR'S a third light particle, yet everytime the scientist's attempt to record ths FACT, they cannot. They can see it for sure. They know it happen's every time they test.. but try recording it using camera's, or any scientific equipment as advanced as even the hydron collector, nope, they cant. They can see it with their own eye's, as can we if we had that type of access, but we cannot 'scientifically' prove what we see. We can agree, debate, argue, go fuckin insane, but we KNOW we can see the 3rd light, that, according to all our knowledge, CANNOT, but does, exist. Allow me to remix 'Thou shalt not create any graven image' - Thoust CANT create any graven image, ha, fuckin ha. This is proof of an intelligence that allow's us 'seeing', but NOT recording, said graven image, and lol, the FACT that this 'image' is nothing more than light. Or as I stated in earlier post's, the test equipment cannot record it, because they have not been made to. By design? Who know's Wink

This thread has provided more than enough evidence for the proof of god in the following format:

'Proof' is regarded as accepted by many, as it was before any electronic gadjet's were made to provide scientific proof, in the form of test equipment or the like. By splitting one light particle into two, and as they pass through the 'card' with the two slot's in it, the third light is produced.

Religion cannot really be used in this 'search', for no matter what one religion 'MAY' accept as proof, another will decry it as nonsense, despite the fact, 'Seeing is believing'.

I on my own provided more evidence using nothing more than my own head, and the fact that knowledge is wisdom, and far superior to any book conceived by man.. after all, just like the hydron collector, the religious book's only tell us what they want us to see, using nothing more than what is, at best, hearsay.

Do your search for the creative thought that grew in the abyss (of time - time is the abyss), for time existed before the creation spoken of in said book's.. This creative thought, is the first action of the mind that allow's us to form the word'(s) we speak. The thought come's from this 'chaos' (dunno why they call nothing, chaos) and vibrate's becoming the sound this diety used to speak the word's 'let there be light'. Look outside. How does all that fit in your head? It cant.

Because it's not up there.. Only when you learn to become 'formless' will you know the truth of what is written in this post alone. Accept it or not, this is the story of creation in it's simplest form.

Your just not allowed to record it.



sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
October 30, 2014, 02:00:58 PM
It's fun, isn't it? Playing with the idea of proving God, or not?

Consider, the only way we prove things is with what we have to prove them. What we have are the things of the universe, and there are a whole lot of these that we don't yet know how to use, maybe don't even know they exist.

So how are we ever going to prove a God Who, in part, exists outside the universe?

Smiley

well he *made* the universe.  that means he's outside it.  right?

Exactly! We build a house, and sometimes we are in it, and sometimes we are outside of it.

Think about a zoo. We build the zoo. Sometimes we go inside it, and sometimes we go outside. But we often keep the animals in cages, so that they can't go outside of the cages, even into the zoo proper, and certainly not outside of the zoo.

Smiley

"God" is said to impact this universe in ways that are tangible to humans (e.g., "touch their hearts"); therefore, should one find no such "touching," one has found there is no such "God."
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 30, 2014, 12:39:10 PM
Well, it's the scientists who consider people to simply be an "extended form" of animal, isn't it? Certainly the animals wouldn't.

Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
October 30, 2014, 12:38:33 PM
It's fun, isn't it? Playing with the idea of proving God, or not?

Consider, the only way we prove things is with what we have to prove them. What we have are the things of the universe, and there are a whole lot of these that we don't yet know how to use, maybe don't even know they exist.

So how are we ever going to prove a God Who, in part, exists outside the universe?

Smiley

well he *made* the universe.  that means he's outside it.  right?

Exactly! We build a house, and sometimes we are in it, and sometimes we are outside of it.

Think about a zoo. We build the zoo. Sometimes we go inside it, and sometimes we go outside. But we often keep the animals in cages, so that they can't go outside of the cages, even into the zoo proper, and certainly not outside of the zoo.

Smiley

i once dreamed I was in a jungle wilderness.  and they put me in a cage, cause i wouldn't believe in G-d.  or the devil.  or that cigarettes caused harm.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 30, 2014, 12:27:34 PM
It's fun, isn't it? Playing with the idea of proving God, or not?

Consider, the only way we prove things is with what we have to prove them. What we have are the things of the universe, and there are a whole lot of these that we don't yet know how to use, maybe don't even know they exist.

So how are we ever going to prove a God Who, in part, exists outside the universe?

Smiley

well he *made* the universe.  that means he's outside it.  right?

Exactly! We build a house, and sometimes we are in it, and sometimes we are outside of it.

Think about a zoo. We build the zoo. Sometimes we go inside it, and sometimes we go outside. But we often keep the animals in cages, so that they can't go outside of the cages, even into the zoo proper, and certainly not outside of the zoo.

Smiley
Jump to: