Pages:
Author

Topic: 📡SCIENTIFICCOIN - BlockShow Oscar Winner🎓+ Invest in scientific discoveries 👓 - page 79. (Read 65855 times)

hero member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 605
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?

I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet.
I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that?
yes i am curious to know what the criteria of evaluation of the various projects will be, but maybe they are not yet available, will they calculate the possibility of success, market evaluation of each project?...
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 263
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?

I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet.
I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that?

According to their beta platform criteria are e.g. evaluation of project developer, project recognition, science intensity, project results, novelty, profitability, etc.

They have also listed some projects with scores but don't know if this is already for real.
With time all this will be clarified and improved, I think that after launch the platform, amendments will be made to make this rating as objective as possible.

Will this eventually be a seperate blockchain or will this keep running on Ethereum?
I see lot's of projects migrating to other chains lately.
member
Activity: 146
Merit: 10
Will you have an app for iOS or Android? SCIENTFICCOIN interested me, but it's not always convenient to follow through the browser.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
I wonder if you could hire scientists on www.hireascientist.com to do a your science homework or a physics project for school.  Grin

sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 251
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. Smiley

They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it.

Yeah the crucial part is the project is this.

If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can.
Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform.

The platform will provide a lot of opportunities to the scientific community, so with good execution I don't see why scientificcoin platform wouldn't be successful.

Yeah, everything is about execution.

I am agreeing with you completely if they execute well, it would be successful. And i'm betting on that they will.

I am also sure of this team. I see here a high potential, and I think that it can develop at a high level, the team will create it.
newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
It seems to me that this platform will help to finance its projects to scientists who want to invent new things. I think this is the future of scientific investigation.
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 104
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?

I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet.
I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that?

According to their beta platform criteria are e.g. evaluation of project developer, project recognition, science intensity, project results, novelty, profitability, etc.

They have also listed some projects with scores but don't know if this is already for real.
With time all this will be clarified and improved, I think that after launch the platform, amendments will be made to make this rating as objective as possible.

Actually, before finalizing an Ico it is complicated to provide all the support as they have done and work in partnerships, conferences, and at the same time keep working on the platform full time. I think after this period, there should be specific people to act on this point
You are right, it requires funding - work of analysts who can create platform with a detailed study of each criterion. I hope in their team there are specialists who will cope with this task.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?

I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet.
I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that?

According to their beta platform criteria are e.g. evaluation of project developer, project recognition, science intensity, project results, novelty, profitability, etc.

They have also listed some projects with scores but don't know if this is already for real.
With time all this will be clarified and improved, I think that after launch the platform, amendments will be made to make this rating as objective as possible.

Actually, before finalizing an Ico it is complicated to provide all the support as they have done and work in partnerships, conferences, and at the same time keep working on the platform full time. I think after this period, there should be specific people to act on this point
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?

I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet.
I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that?

According to their beta platform criteria are e.g. evaluation of project developer, project recognition, science intensity, project results, novelty, profitability, etc.

They have also listed some projects with scores but don't know if this is already for real.
With time all this will be clarified and improved, I think that after launch the platform, amendments will be made to make this rating as objective as possible.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?

I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet.
I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that?
I also don't understand what he means with market evaluation. Maybe means the business opportunity of the project in the market?
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?

I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet.
I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that?

According to their beta platform criteria are e.g. evaluation of project developer, project recognition, science intensity, project results, novelty, profitability, etc.

They have also listed some projects with scores but don't know if this is already for real.
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 102
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?

I bet everyone would want to know that, but I'm not sure these criteria are available yet.
I don't really understand the question about market evaluation...will scientificcoin also do that?
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 104
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. Smiley

They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it.

Yeah the crucial part is the project is this.

If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can.
Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform.

The platform will provide a lot of opportunities to the scientific community, so with good execution I don't see why scientificcoin platform wouldn't be successful.

Yeah, everything is about execution.

I am agreeing with you completely if they execute well, it would be successful. And i'm betting on that they will.
I hope in the near future the team will appear on various crypto events, when they will be heard by everyone - community and the project will grow.
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
Hey. Will there be specific criteria for evaluating projects? And how will the market be evaluated?
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. Smiley

They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it.

Yeah the crucial part is the project is this.

If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can.
Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform.

The platform will provide a lot of opportunities to the scientific community, so with good execution I don't see why scientificcoin platform wouldn't be successful.

Yeah, everything is about execution.

I am agreeing with you completely if they execute well, it would be successful. And i'm betting on that they will.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. Smiley

They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it.

Yeah the crucial part is the project is this.

If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can.
Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform.

The platform will provide a lot of opportunities to the scientific community, so with good execution I don't see why scientificcoin platform wouldn't be successful.

if they manage to attract the capital and get things done on time it will succeed.
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 102
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. Smiley

They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it.

Yeah the crucial part is the project is this.

If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can.
Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform.

The platform will provide a lot of opportunities to the scientific community, so with good execution I don't see why scientificcoin platform wouldn't be successful.
sr. member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 252
Hopefully markets will turn to green and we'll see the latest bull run soon. Lots of high potential projects are going down to recycle bins due to this market conditions, as you said, a mvp or demo is a must.
I wonder if this will be a project for known scientists or if there is a possible opening for upcoming geniuses Smiley
Just sayin, there are a lot of people with bright ideas or studies..

As they are going to evaluate every project I guess everyone is going to have their opportunity.

Each projects that look good to be funded with the platform will have the opportunity to be included. More smart people will benefit from this platform for sure.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. Smiley

They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it.

Yeah the crucial part is the project is this.

If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can.
Indeed at the end of the day the success of the projects they can get is the success of the platform.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
I guess the number one challenge for the devs is how they could get scientists and innovators to utilize the platform and if this will be resolve accordingly, then I am sure this project will be successful in no time. Smiley

They would need to work hard on attracting projects to their platform - a good marketing strategy would be handy in this situation. Hope the team is working on it.

Yeah the crucial part is the project is this.

If they can lure projects in their platform, the project becomes amazing, if not, another dead token. But their team looks like they can.
Pages:
Jump to: