Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 102. (Read 750579 times)

Yes, anyone can withdraw.
It's taking longer then 24 hours but withdraws are happenning.
Spammers will tell you otherwise but they don't have any issues themselves.
Nor any investments in SCC.
Just plain ol' trolling.

in other words, it is possible that pays dust in order to show that it had not yet fallen..?

Withdrawals are inconsistent at best. Many people have had them cancelled and not returned:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12298508
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12288899
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12288972
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12286562
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12218846
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12218875
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12219039
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12219078
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12189182

so no one can withdraw? Website looks working properly..  

Do not get me wrong - I don't want promote scam.

I don't have anything to do with the running of scrypt.cc, I can't help you.   However I did have two different withdraws that returned after the autobuy was turned on and one of them was very hard to see what happened.    

Anyway you have to work on you own behalf for your own accounts.

So then I take it with all of your expertise and big talk, you have evidence that ScryptCC is in fact mining? Please post it here. And stop with the semantics - advocating BTC-Arbs as "a better choice" is promoting it. Let's discard your hard-on for the 6 Th/s for a minute... how exactly can you conclude ScryptCC is anything but a scam? Are you simply going to ignore the per MH reward math that was provided on the last page? You're here blathering about facts... where are your facts? Where's the proof of mining? Without proof of mining, nothing else you postulate matters because that's the initial lie from which all the other lies unfurl.


Not as long as Ponzi Queens and shills continue to promote it...

will this shit ever end

I have never promoted a Ponzi.   Claiming I have is just a lie.     I didn't promote BTC-Arbs, it just thought it was a better choice over another arbitration site that turned scam.  

Scrypt.cc is a scam to you, I don't think it is the same you do.   I also haven't been promoting it.

I think for myself.   I'm not going to get into endless debate here.   You made a claim that scrypt.cc sold 6 THs of scrypt mining.   That claim can't be supported or defended and it greatly weakens your position.   Instead of realizing your error you just attack me.    

Very, very weak.  

Oh and I posted I had been at scrypt.cc since Feb of 2014, that isn't bouncing around.   Here is high lights of my history:
* Started cloud mining a CEX.io, also wrote and used bots there.
* Started at scrypt.cc at Feb. 2014
* Write a miner for ProtoShares (PTS) and still have tons of AngleShares ...
* Tried a lot of altcoins
* Tried BTCarbs - Didn't profit just got my BTC back.
* I've loaned BTC and actually did a lot at BTCjam which I don't recommend unless you enjoyed getting scammed.  
* GAW miners for a while, got out with my BTC.
* I was a GAW, barely got out with my BTC.  
* Mined and sold a lot of Paycoin, before is became a scam.
* Medium sized LTCgear accounts - LTCgear owes me ~30000 LTC and I'm involved in a lawsuit over that  (far from the only one)
* Played some Ponzi games (not Ponzi scams) for a while and totally got my clock cleaned on though to the tune of about 5 BTC.
* Of I done to dice gaming too, but not much, you always lose.
* Build a good sized BTC mining position at Hashnest
* I'm also involved in building a physical mining farm.

That is just the highlights, but you can see I have a lot of experience.   Yes you can twist it to evil intent, but there isn't any.    

So if you only get one thing from this get this.   Putting a bogus claim in your scam rant make the whole rant look stupid.  
  

PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.

More info here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scryptcc-is-provably-lying-about-their-850ghs-scrypt-mining-1102560

Promoting ponzis deserves negative trust. Sorry if you don't agree but that's why we have this peer system. Just because his demeanor is friendly doesn't mean the scams aren't scams. BTC-Arbs was an obvious scam and so is ScryptCC.

Back to accounts? then where is my coin?

Your negative trustrating is inappropriate.
He is just blatantly wrong with his assessments. To be wrong is no crime.

I have perceived him as very friendly over the forums.

All anyone needs to do is look here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=220936 if they want to know whether or not to trust what you're saying.

You bounce from Ponzi to Ponzi, scam to scam, and do your best to promote them to entice others. BTC-Arbs, Bitcoin-trader(dot)biz, Paycoin... all scams you promoted heavily in the face of evidence to the contrary:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6080055
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11129345
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11120912

It's sad that this is your involvement in the crypto community. No amount of semantics, word games, and dissection of pointless minutia will change that this is a giant scam based on a lie. It doesn't matter that you've been involved since Feb 2014, and you're now trying to debate the specific figure of how much fictitious hash is being sold. The point is, its all fake, and its all a lie, and you're promoting a scam.

They have scammed my last 5 payments all over $5 they displayed as complete but nothing in my wallet,

Officially a scam site now, was great while it lasted.

I've been at scrypt.cc since March 2014 and I have a very different view of things. I wonder why is that?

You picked one claim (6 TH/s) that is quite hard to prove now after the fact and you're twisting it into some kind of rebuttal. What about all the other shit that happened?

• Scrypt.cc was NOT profitable for most of its existence as it tracked the perennially unprofitable LTC
• Scrypt.cc had a quick ROI period at the beginning of 2015 when the price of KHS was dropped to LTCGear levels
• Scrypt.cc started experiencing major issues ("farm move", "hack") when LTC rebounded earlier this year
• Scrypt.cc is no more paying anywhere near LTC profitability
• Scrypt.cc removed 37000 KHS from many users accounts
• Scrypt.cc cancelled withdrawals and turned auto-invest on many times
• Scrypt.cc marked withdrawals as completed but did not send the transactions many times
• Scrypt.cc is not communicating with its customers

The list is far from complete. I don't know what you're trying to do but you're not helping anyone that's for sure. The site is a scam and needs to be closed down. At the very least anyone looking for information about it needs to get a fair warning and not some kind of rationalization of what's happening. What's happening is fraud and theft.

Dude, just stop it. The invisible "data-center move" was proof enough. Hard math proof. You still refuse to accept this.

Although this is already enough proof I will add some math for you:

Math with your "mining" rewards:
MH price   
0,00078499 BTC
MH reward per day
0,00001344 BTC

If you would run that MH with real hardware by yourself @ LTC network:
MH reward per day with real hardware
0,0001493 BTC

So the reward for real hardware is 91% higher than with scrypt.cc's mh.
That means the ROI for the scrypt.cc admin is 5,25 days if he is running real hardware.
Well, lets say the power costs are 50% of all rewards, then the ROI is 10,51 days

Now tell me, why should the admin not buy the hashrate out of the orderbook? If he is mining he can be sure that he can't be get scammed by himself.
He has thousands of private BTC's and doesn't invest in his own farm with a 10 day ROI by buying his customers hashrate back?
The risk that something will happen with his "farm" in 10 days is somehow very manageable.

But still, the "data-center move" is enough proof. It was proven to be a lie. You still refuse to give any logical counterargument to the fact that it is not possible that the missing 500-850GH/s for 2 days are not visible in the blockchains.

No worries from me, I've pretty thick skin.    I may have offended and that wasn't my intent either.   

The situation at scrypt.cc is very stressful, even as it is improving.   It causes a lot of heated debate.     

My day trading is limited to FX (I was very, very bad at it...!), but I've worked within the industry and had a good education in futures and options (and I'm a lot better when I can hedge!) Part of the reason I like BTC (despite being involved since 2010 I've never ventured further than BTC into the crypto world) is that I can trade easily - where I live you need a qualification to trade options, and - not having the qualification - BTC lets me do it without the tedium of sitting an exam!

I must admit (and this is partly based on looking at other cloud mining sites) I assumed scrypt.cc was an exchange! I shall avoid non-exchanges, and thanks for the advice. Currently I use Bitfinex for BTC-proper and Coinut for options (though I'm eagerly waiting for Quedex to open for business) - I'm wary of exchange-risk (which Bitfinex made topical recently...) so I tend to spread trading between exchanges (greater risk, but less exposure).

Anyway, apologies if this has discussion has been heated at times. Despite that, it's been educational and ended on a positive note!

(Edit: and apologies to everyone else for straying off-topic with this last post).

Guys just admit it scrypt.cc is dead and pays shit