Topic: SETHER - Arbitrating Advertising - page 77. (Read 52083 times)

This project is completely legal. I see how you are working on all the tasks assigned to you, so I have absolutely no doubt that the project will be successful. I'm sure you have a lot of interested investors and this definitely is your trump card.

Can you explain a bit more? So having smart contracts, AI and blockchain mentiond in ICO is a golden ticket? I feel on the contrary, the xspec has a chance, because they didn't go in to "grab the money and then develop" mode like this looks like...

this looks like "oh we have an tech. idea...let's sell it" - but business perspective is nowhere... the customers won't come by themself... again..how did they calculate the prices? What is the AI box doing? Is it designed or it is a "wish"? Who owns the code? Why isn't the demo app on git? Why doesn't the demo present any of the key features?

All in all, I don't see how someone can say "they have a competent team", "this project has a great future", ... because with current information no one can say this...

also, AI is a important part of that project and only one guy mentions big data (which all in all has nothing to do with AI but it is "closest" to handling a lot of data they have in their team CV's)...

a lot of shady stuff...

Before investing am pretty sure investors will surely look for the white paper as it makes them understand the project softcap, concept, tokens etc. I feel Sether will take place huge success as it is dealing with smart contracts. Twitter endorsement with bobsrepair endorsing spectare really makes to think 

Yes, I also saw in twitter that he endorsed that bobsrepair project. He is also endorsing spectre. I am not sure. Maybe he gets a commission for endorsing those projects? Pages of whitepaper doesn't matter because Im sure most of investors didn't read that.

It is 25-pager and the rest are just table listing API method names ))) somebody thought this will make the whitepaper look "smart"

Wait,

so 466 sether per Eth?

wtf that is a high price for some tokens without a ready product or any numbers to present,

i saw an ICO endorsed by McAfee called bobsrepair and they give 6000 tokens per ether, and i thought that was much for a 40 page whitepaper

Let your hair down man, did you seriously think he will ask? 
I've already stated here in the thread that he was either paid to promote Sether project or he is on the founders' list.
btw I'm quite concerned about devs/op activity, which is barely noticeable.

Why you think so? We can to help with some ideas in our vision of this project, only developers can do like we say or not) It is only their decision anyway. 

Edit 2: a couple of other guys are now trying to push my posts "up" so that people don't read them

Yes, there is a possibility that he is planning to have an ICO or he already have one? For now, the only clear this is he makes the coins pumps and dumps everytime he is advertising it.

I am not gonna wonder if he is an owner of an ICO. He has more than 10.000 BTC so it must not be very difficult for someone to organize an ICO; he has also a background as software company owner.

And you agree with him becauseeee?

Or with you last post on SETHER you said "Yes i completely agree with you. Sometimes successful ico price will also go down  and after sometimes it will increase 10 times or more.So it's depend on us to choose the good platform for investment.And SETHER is the best platform for investment.I belive that SETHER will acheive great success and give us huge profits."

So you said SETHER IS THE BEST PLATFORM FOR INVESTMENT. Can you please elaborate why do you think so? What research did you do? What questions did you come up with?
How do you see their business model? Who are business partners who will use this service? Why isn't the GITHUB updated?

Another post generator.... ah....

EDIT 1:

Mr Charming opened his bitcointalk account less then two months ago... and about month and half ago s/he posted:
"3    Economy / Trading Discussion / what is trading?   on: November 07, 2017, 06:56:49 AM
Hello btctalk.i am newbie here.And i want to know what is trading And how to do it?  Any secure site for trading?
How much minimum investment need for trading?
And is it risky?
All advice appreciate.thank you Cheesy"

So s/he was interested WHAT IS TRADING

And now, s/he is giving advice on should someone go into an ICO and if it will have profit.

I rest my case.
Q.U.A.D.

How do you know they are committed? you used the same line for a different ICO yesterday "From my understanding, you are committed to go live regardless of the outcome of the ICO campaign. I think all you need to get attention to the project is to releasing alpha version and that will give full image about Bmail. we wish you all the best."

This what I am talking about.. you also said you tested the Alpha version and that is great... what is great in it? Server errors? Data without any sense? Displaying images as RAW data (who wants to see base64 encoded images on web site? )

I would always like to see open minded discussions rather than a ton of BS posts... if people choose to invest just because a lost of people said "oh, this is great", "oh, they are nice people", "oh, they are experienced" then this world is doomed No wonder that China put a stop to ICO's until they formalize them...

Edit 1: this just supports my idea that there should be a "body" in charge of formally approving ICO's.
i.e. you can't enter the ICO unless you have a workable demo, standardized specification/whitepaper, business model, KYC model for ICO members so if you want to reference that someone is supporting you, advising you, CEO, CBO (chief bullshit office), CXX, whatever then there should be a blockchain trace that they approved this and it is written for all time that they were involved with that ICO and what was their position on that ICO and did they receive any compensation...

As Vitalik said, we should aim to improve what and how can be used in blockchain world...and not just be money driven... this shows me that anything can raise money now days (and let's not kid our-self 6 million dollars, i repeat, 6 MILLION dollars, is a hell lot money to give someone for two web pages with two charts and a login screen)... but again, that is just me...as we can see...6 mil. dollars were paid by people who think this is obviously enough... sad day for humanity....

I despair at some of the comments. (and I'm invested)
"This is awesome", "we fully trust this", "a great team"
Lets be honest, you know nothing about the team and its impossible to tell right now what the product will be like (at the moment its just vaporware)
Lets keep some realism here, pumping the s**t out of it based on non-factual information is not going to help any of us in the long run

the team of this project committed to go live regardless of the outcome of the ICO campaign, so I don't they are hungry just to collect money. I don't know why some people are focusing on other posts instead of giving their opinion. Lots of people start posting here after Mcafee twitter about sether. Also when someone invest in a project he starts posting and support it to encourage other people. for me I don't invest base on any post here, I always do my own research.

Will hope so that this project will be succesful after the ICO. Lets just keep promoting this on social medias and other forums.

And then I ask myself how did McAffee decide this ICO is worth it? ))) I asked him on twitter but he ain't answering

And still, they received almost 600.000 per Web service they have to connect to )) damn....nice money for a couple of months work

They're either bots, already invested in the ICO, or are getting paid.
There's almost no discussion in this thread, only hype.
I mean, come on? This is stupid.

PLEASE READ:

Just to prove my case, please check the this author "seriin" that wrote this post, and check what he wrote in the last 10 days and you will see this comment has nothing to do with this ICO and that this is either a BOT or a PAYED bullshiter ))) Now I understand why there are a lot of comments like this in this group...

Edit 1: you can even extend the search, you will see s/he commented on every possible ICO
Again, I recommend that people start giving arguments along with their "thoughts" of future success of this projet

and another one