Topic: Shelᖚy (TPTB_need_war) Psychoanalysis. Smartest Man in the Altcoin Discussions? - page 8. (Read 8853 times)

First block chain that provably has 1 million unique daily users wins.

Deal or no deal?

When trying to achieve something like that, it is a big risk. All your hard effort might flop. So of course most people would prefer something more immediate and more controllable such as an ICO.

All I can say is I try to find something I enjoy working on which feels exciting. I am not any of those other people, because I am myself, unique and flawed as the person I am.

I don't respect these ICOs, and I didn't scream when ETH did theirs because it was apparently done with legal counsel (although I still don't agree that they think they can side skirt regulations against selling to non-accredited US investors). They are those who are afraid to risk it all for greatness. And so they make a silly thread like this.

Fuserleer those are some kinds words.

Okay everyone back to your regularly scheduled ICO programming. Nothing more to see here. Goodnight.

wow, very interesting! a VERY high appraisal.

but why the if and would's.  u're basically saying he lacks something which holds back his potential ?  

Shelby! Can you produce something sparkly and spectacular?

~CfA~

The usual suspects really; Buterin, Maxwell, Andresen, King, Satoshi (can of worms? lol), etc

Whether anyone has the patience to work with him is another matter But, if he can focus, work on his people skills or even do it solo, I do think he would produce something quite spectacular.

IMO TPTB is a rough diamond, you're gunna cut your fingers to bits handling him, but if you can persevere, you might just end up with something sparkly.

Thank you for ur contribution! what are some of these top minds in crypto that Shelby can compete with?

~CfA~

I've got quite a bit of respect for TPTB, despite us clashing heads sometimes and his sometimes crazy behavior!

He's a smart guy for sure, but he's not always right.  No human is always right though, everyone makes mistakes even the greatest minds in history, but thats ok because it enables you to learn.

With that in mind though, I would consider him to be as capable as any of the top minds in crypto, I just wish he would stop bloody posting endlessly and do it

sure thang, but I for one don't wanna know if ppl like him or not. thats totally arbitrary.
with Shelᖚy, it is all about intelligence. Hence I can't remove the smartness part: this is what it's all about.

Let me sum this all up with a nifty quote or two
~CfA~

 
There are other possibilities/explanations as I have said. Hence why this forum needs peer reviews on all devs and project leaders. Even then it would come down to probability and faith. If you are not smart enough to personally digest a concept and verify it then you are at the mercy of others who are able to. It is then a matter of how much faith you have in them and how probable it is that they are all colluding or have motive to.

You are of course correct though that if every person is reliant upon their own "smartness" to verify anothers "smart level" scored against the average "smart level" on this board. Then the poll obviously becomes worthless unless everyone here is = or greater in "smartness" with regards tptb and the average poster?
Else how could you know for sure.

May as well just ask do you like him or not? the smartness part might as well be removed.

Smart or not, your definitely trending towards insane if after realizing this you keep posting hoping that the outcome will change.

Being in the top 1% of altcoin posters might not be quite the compliment you think it is ...

oh! well one could certainly believe hes a talker with average IQ but u are saying that he IS above average here, and very smart indeed. actually in the top 0.01% according to ur evaluation. being able to say this means that u do understand his postings at a level that goes beyond just thinking that hes smart. however thats not so important now. This thread is about the 'why, what and where' of Shelby, TPTB_need_war.

thank u for ur valuable opinion and contribution, cryptohunter!

~CfA~

That is not the only logical explanation.

Being able to assess this u must obviously be very, very smart as well!

~CfA~

Let's be serious. He is smarter than the vast majority here. Anyone voting he is not smart should reveal themselves so they can have a conceptual debate with him over something in public. Very few would head him off. I believe only those tiny % that are math wizards would have a chance if they can keep the debate in their purely maths expressed/orientated domain.

He may not be a pure math boffin. However, with regard conceptual thought he is a cut above 99.+% here. I have yet to see him lose a debate based upon observable events and the logical conclusions one would draw from them.

Yes, there are some real math wizards here. There are those that will hail to the belief that unless you're able to use math at the highest of levels you are not the smartest of the smart. Even so if the entire board was to vote here and use their "smart level" as a basis for this poll it would be 99 votes to smart vs 1 to not that smart. Perhaps greater even than that.

Even so, this thread is pointless. Anyone who has read his posts from the start will know.

1. he is smarter than most
2. he is outspoken and rubs some up the wrong way

Is he the very smartest person on this board? if he had more time spent in pure maths based pursuits and education?? who can say.

Who will know this apart from the very smartest here? so you are asking a handful of people to give their opinions on something 99.999% of the board will never be able to validate.

Not sure if I'm right with this, but I've been reading his comments on a few threads so far where he theorycrafted on his "project" and it seemed to me that he never could decide and stay by a single idea so far and kept changing everything from the basics on a weekly/monthly period.

You can call it perfectionism, but if Satoshi had that attitude he would have never come to releasing Bitcoin and thus never would have started a financial revolution. So I will rather call it dreaming and I don't think he will ever release anything or if he will, it won't have an impact anymore.

Also the part where he acts like he invented something superior to every current crypto-currency contradicts with his project and it's current state.

“To destroy is easier than to create, and that is why so many people are ready to demonstrate against what they reject. But what would they say if one asked them what they wanted instead?” - Ivan Klima

I share ur interest.  I havent seen a proper project yet, just a staggering amount of nifty texts that he wrote so far. That might change.  The texts reflect his potential.
~CfA~

Personally I'm very interested in a project that he creates I would like to see less of trying to critisize or "structure" others and more development of a project that adds something to the community. That's my personal opinion.

thank u very much for all of the great comments guys.

it does seem like 'Shelby is indeed very smart and above most here' is leading so far.

~CfA~

I imagine it's pretty complicated--I've been working on a poem for a decade now (not the only one), but every version changes a bit and I spend time away from it and then I change it dramatically and then it sits and then it seems perfect and the next day, WTF it reads like crap and on and on and on...... And that's only 7 pages, not an entire network, so maybe, it will take some time to get the project he wants on his terms?

You talking about the project he promised years ago?