Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects. - page 9.

Kersh768

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 256

Freshdice.com

Quote from: bartolo on September 14, 2019, 04:34:29 AM

Why are you so sure that the only reason behind the fate of those projects is having been listed on a bad exchange? I'm not so sure that is the only reason, maybe those projects are not so attractive to investors for any reason, or maybe the altcoin bear market is pushing them down, it's possible that having been listed on a big exchange would not have changed anything.

I do agree.
It seems that it is not on the exchanges no more where problem arise but to the bear market itself. Right now, no matter what exchanges they list a new coin, its market value will still fall as being influenced by the market behavior. This implies, in my opinion, that this is not just the right time for projects. The proof to this I think, are those numerous huge projects which had good exchanges, huge potential and popularity but the coin still ended up with a market value far from its ICO price, perhaps.

DDante

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 19

Seriously i don't expect all new projects to met their hardcap and if they don't there will be problem to list on big exchanges but even mid rated exchanges are plague with problems like fake volume and bot trades, really most times i don't blame devs who can't list on better exchanges

Palider

hero member

Activity: 1273

Merit: 507

Quote from: Mealea on September 14, 2019, 12:30:18 AM

It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.

Yes, I have seen many such instances where the project is so wonderful that it suddenly turns into shitcoin.

To be aware of you I will also give the names of these tokens as per

Buddy, Araw, Sapien Network this is this great project that was ruined by shit exchanges.

Latoken big listing fee, fake volume. p2pb2b fake volume with many bots.

10c

full member

Activity: 658

Merit: 100

BuyAnyLight - Blockchain LED Marketplace

Quote from: TitanGEL on October 16, 2019, 07:07:50 AM

Developers should focus on listing their tokens, their project are becoming shit if they got listed on a exchange that doesn't have enough users. There are only exchanges that are good so the developers should focus on listing their coins in these kinds of exchanges.

Pay attention to the coins that conducted IEO on such large exchanges as Coinbene / Bitforex. all projects that fell on these exchanges also fell very deep in price. I think that only a Binance can withstand such fall, but after some time delists some pairs as it was with BTT

Edraket31

hero member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 511

Quote from: TitanGEL on October 16, 2019, 07:07:50 AM

Developers should focus on listing their tokens, their project are becoming shit if they got listed on a exchange that doesn't have enough users. There are only exchanges that are good so the developers should focus on listing their coins in these kinds of exchanges.

Sometimes, dev and team are not focus on a good exchange as they know how much cost it is worth, and it is too expensive. For some team, they would prefer using their money in developing their platform rather than having a good exchange but no real use case, if the project is good, the good exchange would really like to list them at very cheap price and sometimes for free.

inanilujimi

sr. member

Activity: 1876

Merit: 259

if the project is good, it will not be included in the garbage exchange, so the conclusion is not the problematic exchange, but the project is not good.
sometimes there is a project that promises to be listed on a popular exchange but in reality they can't.
what is clear is that there have been many popular exchange feasibility tests putting new projects on their altcoin list.

Winderer

member

Activity: 411

Merit: 19

If a project is good, people will find any suitable exchange to buy a token.

TitanGEL

sr. member

Activity: 1036

Merit: 281

Developers should focus on listing their tokens, their project are becoming shit if they got listed on a exchange that doesn't have enough users. There are only exchanges that are good so the developers should focus on listing their coins in these kinds of exchanges.

103deltafox

full member

Activity: 491

Merit: 100

It really baffles me after so much wait, why then list in exchanges without volume, a shit exchange. Sometimes I know investors are the cause of this, the want to see the projected listed, but that is wrong, it's not just about listing but listing in an exchange that will increase the value of the project, also sometimes these developers don't want to spend so much on listing, they need so much profit and at the end they spoil everything with they have worked for with their hand.

pandanaran

full member

Activity: 1048

Merit: 101

as we know that such a project has become the original plan of the developer. because no developer wants to destroy the good project they have built, just because of a bad exchange. so logically developers who are really serious will always develop their projects well including registering on large exchanges. You can redefine what I mean.

xOdiumNostrumx

full member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 101

Quote from: Patrix_1 on October 16, 2019, 02:24:17 AM

Without any doubt projects that are listed on exchanges like Exmartes are already dead. Team members think that they can save money from token sale by listing their tokens on such exchanges, without even to understand that this is a fatal decision.

I dont think that teams behind such projects really care about the investors in their project or the price action of their tokens. Most of them have successfully or semi-successfully bagged a hefty amount of funds via ICOs and IEOs, so their "job" is done. So they are probably aware that listing on these low-tier exchanges is a suicide, but as I said before, they probably just dont care as their wallet has been filled already.

Patrix_1

member

Activity: 364

Merit: 10

Without any doubt projects that are listed on exchanges like Exmartes are already dead. Team members think that they can save money from token sale by listing their tokens on such exchanges, without even to understand that this is a fatal decision.

awakpane

member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 12

It is unfortunate if good project coins sign up for bad luck. Moreover, lately many pesky exchanges have sprung up that only want to reap profits, thus making other people trading there losing. it looks like that unlucky exchange must be removed so that others don't lose.

meliodas

sr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 329

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

This is really a true story. Good projects are still good until they are listed in a shit exchange. There are only few exchanges that are good like Binance. I used to join into bounty campaigns of the projects that looks good for me and I supported them from the start until the finished doing their coin offering, it was all good until the team decided to apply to shit exchanges because they are being pressured by the users and investors of the project because they really want to trade the token but they didn't know that rushing all of the major things in a project will end up really bad and the price of the coin turns out to be falling under the ICO price and the project just went straight up dead.

desticy

sr. member

Activity: 1512

Merit: 292

www.cd3d.app

Quote from: Irvinn on October 14, 2019, 07:00:26 AM

If, for example, IEO was announced by the Binance exchange, which is a very authoritative resource in the cryptocurrency market, then I completely trust the new project in this case. If it is announced by less famous exchanges, then I am concerned about these projects. And any changes that the team makes should be in relation to its project, should be duplicated and explained also by the exchange that conducts IEO. I suppose if things are exactly like that in this situation, then many problems can be solved.

Alas, you are right. The crypto market can be divided into segments, some have more money and they are of better quality, others have less and they are weaker.
The Binance Exchange and its like are included in the top segment, which causes the most confidence from investors, which means that no matter which project will be placed on Binance, it will immediately receive a large credit of trust, at least for the time of the sale.

Irvinn

full member

Activity: 966

Merit: 104

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: TelolettOm on October 14, 2019, 05:29:40 AM

If IEO or ICO when finished selling to be able to measure the project we can see where the initial market listing they will choose. whether the strategic exchange category or the exchange is only Fake Trading Volume. this is the initial assessment that we can give to a newly launched project whether good or not to choose

yes because ICO or IEO developers have a goal for the exchange problem so we can judge if they are unable to enter the tokens they make at large exchanges then I think they are not seriously developers and this applies to the contrary.

If, for example, IEO was announced by the Binance exchange, which is a very authoritative resource in the cryptocurrency market, then I completely trust the new project in this case. If it is announced by less famous exchanges, then I am concerned about these projects. And any changes that the team makes should be in relation to its project, should be duplicated and explained also by the exchange that conducts IEO. I suppose if things are exactly like that in this situation, then many problems can be solved.

TelolettOm

hero member

Activity: 2086

Merit: 553

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

If IEO or ICO when finished selling to be able to measure the project we can see where the initial market listing they will choose. whether the strategic exchange category or the exchange is only Fake Trading Volume. this is the initial assessment that we can give to a newly launched project whether good or not to choose

cutesgirl

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 251

Bad and scam project coin because listed with shit exchange market, if many ICO want to listed with big market and always make announce for listing with big exchange I think no one of ICO will be lower price, but many time ICO listed with shit exchange market have less volume transaction and not many investor on shit coin will make price down and ICO become scam with lower price, if listing with big market many investor want to buy after listing.

Rhaizan

full member

Activity: 518

Merit: 100

Quote from: ttcsalam on October 14, 2019, 04:59:21 AM

A good project is when there is a loss or loss for any reason. Then the investors suffer the most. Investors always want to lose their capital but because of some bad project they are losing their capital.

they lost money because they dont care loosing it. in the first place you should not invested to project that cannot guarateed a return . investing in ICO is not sure money you might loose too much if you trust too much for a project .

ttcsalam

copper member

Activity: 1120

Merit: 2

A good project is when there is a loss or loss for any reason. Then the investors suffer the most. Investors always want to lose their capital but because of some bad project they are losing their capital.

Topic: Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects. - page 9. (Read 5407 times)