Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects. - page 5.

imstillthebest

full member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 122

Quote from: DevilSlayer on December 06, 2019, 09:16:18 PM

Most of the developers have a good plan for the development of their product but it gets ruined after they listed their coin in shit exchange. It called shit exchange because it has fake market capitalization and volume. Most of the coin listed in shit exchanges are now dead or delisted because of no demand in the market.

ouch that so sad and bad to hear .

this should be a wake up call for those who wanted to make a good coin or a good project .

if they want it to be succesful then they should start saving a good budget to list that coin onto a good exchange because people do also pick a good exchange before they decide to buy a coin .

DevilSlayer

sr. member

Activity: 1456

Merit: 359

Most of the developers have a good plan for the development of their product but it gets ruined after they listed their coin in shit exchange. It called shit exchange because it has fake market capitalization and volume. Most of the coin listed in shit exchanges are now dead or delisted because of no demand in the market.

oktana

sr. member

Activity: 1680

Merit: 288

Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!

Quote from: jets567 on December 06, 2019, 08:15:59 PM

Aside from reducing the cost of listing, the project owners want more liquidity on their native coin/token that's is why they are trying to be listed in different exchanges as much as possible though the outcome is not good because if they were listed on bad exchange then it gets some bad impression with the project as well and this is someting that the project owners have to look for to minimize price dumping while getting more liquidity.

they must follow the trend, if at present the market is more pleased with IEO, then they must abandon their intention to ICO.

They may only be able to choose a small exchange, but make sure the internal team does not sell their economic rights first to prevent a collapse in prices, in the end investors will also think that their project is serious and not panic when bitcoin falls, Strategies must be made to maintain value, this is entirely also not because of the exchange factor.

matchi2011

sr. member

Activity: 1456

Merit: 267

Buy $BGL before it's too late!

Quote from: soramon on December 06, 2019, 06:42:06 PM

Yeah i saw few good projects end with low quality exchange. I think there must be a reason why the project choosed that exchange. Maybe they dont have big fund to get better exchange or something else. Bad decision ruin the project it self.

Investors interest are not going to engaged with shit exchange making the project to turned to nothing after being added. It's a need for every team to make a good habits to try bringing the project inside reputable exchange where volumes of traders can see how the new project works and let them
to research and study to figure out if there's a good potentials and usages in the future.

cryptothreads

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 500

Quote from: fuer44 on December 06, 2019, 07:45:10 PM

because the team is tempted with a small fee for the token listing fee. even though it doesn't guarantee the token will end well or not. at least the team must pay attention to exhange with high trading volume in order to get a good market capitalization there. although the fee is rather high, at least it will pay off if the trading volume is high.

Agree. Most new projects often don't have a lot of money to list at the exchange and this makes it easy to become a shitcoin if liquidity is bad. I never invest in those coins because the opportunity to seek profit is very low and if unlucky I will lose a lot of money when investing. Currently only choose the coins available in this market and consider buying more if cheap.

However, you also need to spend a lot of time researching pennies and ensuring liquidity at any time.

jets567

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 511

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Aside from reducing the cost of listing, the project owners want more liquidity on their native coin/token that's is why they are trying to be listed in different exchanges as much as possible though the outcome is not good because if they were listed on bad exchange then it gets some bad impression with the project as well and this is someting that the project owners have to look for to minimize price dumping while getting more liquidity.

fuer44

sr. member

Activity: 1652

Merit: 262

because the team is tempted with a small fee for the token listing fee. even though it doesn't guarantee the token will end well or not. at least the team must pay attention to exhange with high trading volume in order to get a good market capitalization there. although the fee is rather high, at least it will pay off if the trading volume is high.

soramon

full member

Activity: 983

Merit: 100

👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh | 🔥 Ultimate Launc

Yeah i saw few good projects end with low quality exchange. I think there must be a reason why the project choosed that exchange. Maybe they dont have big fund to get better exchange or something else. Bad decision ruin the project it self.

Peanyut991

member

Activity: 287

Merit: 10

Yes this case happens a lot, many ICO projects are good but in the end it fails, because it chose a bad exchange for the token. I think developers should pay attention to this, they should be able to choose the best exchanges for their tokens.

Hardcore-coin

member

Activity: 203

Merit: 14

Quote from: dcomomal on November 24, 2019, 12:12:38 PM

Nothing in the world harms the project more than listing on bad exchanges. Team members cannot even realise that with only one fault, they can ruin the whole project, especially such garbage exchanges as Latoken or Probit.

Really hard to anderstand why projects list their coin to this exchanges. Maybe because they have a free listing? But better use decentralised exchanges in this case.

dcomomal

copper member

Activity: 238

Merit: 0

Nothing in the world harms the project more than listing on bad exchanges. Team members cannot even realise that with only one fault, they can ruin the whole project, especially such garbage exchanges as Latoken or Probit.

key4co.in

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 503

Quote from: The3max on November 24, 2019, 10:06:44 AM

fake trading volumes, bots, no liquidity ... these are signs of Shit exchanges. Recently, the top CMC has always shown the top position of P2B, while this is a shit exchange, I am very upset about this! A good project should receive attention and investment from the developer. However, with the listing on the shit exchange, it will be a dead project.

Sometimes startup projects list on low rated exchanges because of inadequate funds or very high listing fees placed by Top reputable exchanges. Well most times team members get greedy and won't want to channel funds to list on good exchanges, which is always bad for the project. Some coins are dead on arrival when they list on crappie exchanges. Looking at your write up, I really wonder why there is no remedy yet for fake trading volumes on CMC, like you mentioned P2PB2B being top rank occasionally on CMC which is false.

Golftech

hero member

Activity: 2128

Merit: 520

Quote from: The3max on November 24, 2019, 10:06:44 AM

fake trading volumes, bots, no liquidity ... these are signs of Shit exchanges. Recently, the top CMC has always shown the top position of P2B, while this is a shit exchange, I am very upset about this! A good project should receive attention and investment from the developer. However, with the listing on the shit exchange, it will be a dead project.

If the developers collaborates with shit exchange and start to create artificial movements and attract investors then trapped it up then surely the fate of the project will be doomed. There's a lots of projects who became extinct after listed to shit exchange. It's a obligation of the team to add their work to a good project since most of the time the project got a good chance of surviving.

oktana

sr. member

Activity: 1680

Merit: 288

Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!

There are two reasons that can be understood in terms of marketing

The developer wants the price development stage to start from the regular market first and does a regular unlock to prevent sequential dumps, if they delay listing too long, it will also become a wave of large landfills, very ironic because indeed coins eventually die in the first choice exchange .

and the second is due to the inability of the developer to pass requirements on a more competent exchange, or do not have experience with it and are only concerned with instant profit.

The3max

full member

Activity: 317

Merit: 100

https://leasehold.io/

fake trading volumes, bots, no liquidity ... these are signs of Shit exchanges. Recently, the top CMC has always shown the top position of P2B, while this is a shit exchange, I am very upset about this! A good project should receive attention and investment from the developer. However, with the listing on the shit exchange, it will be a dead project.

cryptonewbie

full member

Activity: 434

Merit: 100

I hope that last line from the OP strikes a chord in the minds of these shady devs. The do not care about the value of their tokens once they have collected funds from the token sale. It is a very daft move to list on a shitty exchange but these devs don't give a damn to what investors think once they have their funds

Longthi_4823_Love

newbie

Activity: 62

Merit: 0

shit exchange is very unworthy exchange. It frustrates investors and does not believe in the project anymore. Communication is important, but being in a hurry is not good.

Apinya_Anong1111

newbie

Activity: 62

Merit: 0

A shit exchange can demonstrate the quality of the whole project. Many investors are afraid of looking back on the growth of projects which are in decline, so hurry to change everything. I don't think so.

cotton ball

sr. member

Activity: 1288

Merit: 253

When many ICO or IEO listed whit shit exchange become end of investment on crypto, many ICO and IEO don't care about for listing with shit exchange, after raised sold out their coins why not think for listing with good exchange market have many investor, why use shit exchange market for listing their ICO and IEO coins, why not care about how much money use by investor.

spadormie

sr. member

Activity: 840

Merit: 268

Quote from: Mealea on September 14, 2019, 12:30:18 AM

-snip-

All I think is that, this was just an ordinary undergoing cycle of projects in cryptocurrency. It starts with a 'shit' exchange and then if the project is really good and have some funds, it will later on will try bigger exchange. That's what I think they're trying to do. But, whenever the devs can't support going to a bigger exchange, then that's their limitation, I think their project is not that trendy.

Topic: Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects. - page 5. (Read 5400 times)