Topic: Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects. - page 6. (Read 5381 times)
I think it all depends on demand and also supply. the community is also very influential for this kind of thing. a project without development is impossible to run for long.
This is actually one of the biggest mistakes that some projects developers always do just because they don't have good advisers and are not ready to listen to their community. Listing a project in a top exchange will go a far way in making a project to be successful.
There are many reasons that make developers put their coins / tokens on shit exchange, for investors to be calm because they have entered the market even though it is shit or small exchange.
In this case, who ultimately benefits? Investors invest in projects not just to start listing on exchanges after an ICO.The thing is that the market has become too speculative and everyone wants to,, fast,, earn a lot of money.But if you include the brain, investors a priori should not expect to return on their investments, at least 1-2 years.
The market should be controlled by someone or something which prevent the fake tokens and fake exchanges.
Developers in a hurry to listing their tokens to shit exchange may be solely to attract investors so that project status is already listed on the exchange, so that many investors are interested in investing their money in that project. Also besides that it is possible to attract many bounty hunters for join and promote their projects, so their projects develop and quickly become widely known by various people groups.
It's still not gonna work if they will force everything, listing in a shit exchange will not gonna help your project build a good reputation. People will look at the basic information before buying a certain coin, information that are very visible is their trading volume and what exchange they are listed, so if they will see that its in shit exchange, they will not be attractive with the coin.
Actually its better to look for the right timing to list and should be in a good exchange, at this time, there's nothing to worry if it will only result to dump.
that they will enlist the coin inside reputable exchange instead of pushing it with shit exchange which would only lessen investors interest. The only investors that will be glad are those early birds who can completely dumped their coins together with the bonuses and move away after.
90% of projects will do that because without being registered in the exchange they will not be known and will not be interested in people, I have a few examples of projects that have good development if you know that they have been developing projects for a very long time even though they have accumulated a lot of investor funds but until now This they have not registered at the exchange, because they have their own choice. so you can assess projects that are quality and which are not quality
Developers in a hurry to listing their tokens to shit exchange may be solely to attract investors so that project status is already listed on the exchange, so that many investors are interested in investing their money in that project. Also besides that it is possible to attract many bounty hunters for join and promote their projects, so their projects develop and quickly become widely known by various people groups.
It's still not gonna work if they will force everything, listing in a shit exchange will not gonna help your project build a good reputation. People will look at the basic information before buying a certain coin, information that are very visible is their trading volume and what exchange they are listed, so if they will see that its in shit exchange, they will not be attractive with the coin.
Actually its better to look for the right timing to list and should be in a good exchange, at this time, there's nothing to worry if it will only result to dump.
It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.
After announce for ICO coin listed with shit exchange become the end of crypto and ICO investment way, look not serious want to adopt and make their coin become competitor in coinmarket cap listed with shit exchange, few investor become member in shit coin because not have chance with buy or sell order there. When listing with bigger exchange make some altcoin although not success in ICO have chance to success after listing. It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.
I will not blame it entirely to the exchange, it's the dev team's decision after all. They knew it from te beginning that being listed is expensive and does not guarantee the success of the project. It's a trend to be on the list, a standard for many investors and traders. If they did not get listed the crypto, people might have second thoughts on investing or using the crypto.
It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.
Being listed on an exchange, gives some sense of security for the investors. It also depends on the nature of the coin, and it is most likely that the project aims for daily trading transactions so, it will be good to see them on the exchange. Of course the downside of this will be the cost but they have to pay the price or else some people will not recognize them. It is kind of sad to think that cryptocurrency is created to remove third party on transactions yet, we depend on platforms like exhanges in this business.
Developers in a hurry to listing their tokens to shit exchange may be solely to attract investors so that project status is already listed on the exchange, so that many investors are interested in investing their money in that project. Also besides that it is possible to attract many bounty hunters for join and promote their projects, so their projects develop and quickly become widely known by various people groups.
It won't be right to blame the ICOs and the IEOs for that. The projects may be operating on a shoe-string budget and they may be unable to afford the huge listing fees. Please remember that the exchange listing fee has gone up astronomically over the past two years. The largest exchanges (such as Huobi and Binance) change millions of USD for a single listing (and that too after very stringent screening). Even mid level exchanges such as Coindeal are charging somewhere around $100,000 now.
So true, sometimes projects do not raise huge sums to enable them list on top exchanges with very high liquidity. I don't blame it on projects which didn't raise much entirely, the centralized exchanges demanding extremely high listing fees should be blamed. If most crypto enthusiasts can patronize decentralized exchanges (even though almost all still lack required features), daily trading volume for some DEX will compete with centralized exchanges and it will be favorable for good projects which didn't raise huge sums during token sale. 
Many projects listed in popular exchanges also die. Dead or no, not based on where they listed the coins, but the seriousness of the team in running the project. In this case the team's target must be clear in carrying out the project. Not just register to exchange, then they leave.
It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.
Market conditions could change the plans even roadmap. Some token listed shit exchange for rest of the marketcap reach, where some listed for lack of funds. Thorecoin listed in low exchange but condition is good. Guessing Buzzshow has interest to build website then will listed exchange. 
It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.
Maybe we often see new projects after completing ICO and IEO, they register for exchanges that are classified as low, or do not have users. Yes, I think it's true what you said, after all this time running the project, then their ending made it to an exchange with no users. This will make the token die in the exchange. But signing up for an exchange like Binance is also very difficult. Because of exchanges like Binance many coins are listed, so it takes a long time to do it.
Listing in a reputable exchange will get a huge chunk of the financial funds of the project. So if the project has very lil amount of money, they can't afford to be listed in a good exchange, that's when they resort to substandard exchanges, which is not favourable in the long term.But if the team is serious, they can always opt to bring their coin to a better one later on. If in case, their project will not be a success in delivering their mission, then, more than likely they will slowly die in that substandard exchange.
Many projects listed in popular exchanges also die. Dead or no, not based on where they listed the coins, but the seriousness of the team in running the project. In this case the team's target must be clear in carrying out the project. Not just register to exchange, then they leave.
It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.
Maybe we often see new projects after completing ICO and IEO, they register for exchanges that are classified as low, or do not have users. Yes, I think it's true what you said, after all this time running the project, then their ending made it to an exchange with no users. This will make the token die in the exchange. But signing up for an exchange like Binance is also very difficult. Because of exchanges like Binance many coins are listed, so it takes a long time to do it.
Listing in a reputable exchange will get a huge chunk of the financial funds of the project. So if the project has very lil amount of money, they can't afford to be listed in a good exchange, that's when they resort to substandard exchanges, which is not favourable in the long term.But if the team is serious, they can always opt to bring their coin to a better one later on. If in case, their project will not be a success in delivering their mission, then, more than likely they will slowly die in that substandard exchange.
It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.
Maybe we often see new projects after completing ICO and IEO, they register for exchanges that are classified as low, or do not have users. Yes, I think it's true what you said, after all this time running the project, then their ending made it to an exchange with no users. This will make the token die in the exchange. But signing up for an exchange like Binance is also very difficult. Because of exchanges like Binance many coins are listed, so it takes a long time to do it.
If the project has their success in their public sale and they are confident enough that they can compete in the community and has a good future then they should list in good exchange and prevent being in a shit platform. But still, there are many of them choosing to die with those exchanges!
I think this depends a lot on the investor because if the project has a clear development strategy but doesn't attract new entrants, the project will soon be forgotten. This market has had a lot of big changes this year and investors tend to invest in new projects more bbecause those are projects that bring them good profits. Maybe risky but if you know the right project, you will easily make money without having to worry much. It won't be right to blame the ICOs and the IEOs for that. The projects may be operating on a shoe-string budget and they may be unable to afford the huge listing fees. Please remember that the exchange listing fee has gone up astronomically over the past two years. The largest exchanges (such as Huobi and Binance) change millions of USD for a single listing (and that too after very stringent screening). Even mid level exchanges such as Coindeal are charging somewhere around $100,000 now.
The idea of ICO's and IEO's are really good it is just it was misused and was take for granted by those who are scammers, there were legit projects too who failed to raised money with their preferred and run away, they turned out scam too. So, it was because of the people who has a bad intention in doing it.
You should understand that very often such exchanges are the main investors of projects. But there is still the price question. Listing on a good stock exchange is very expensive and very often the project fails to raise such a large amount. Therefore, the organizers of the project want to quickly get listed on absolutely any exchange in order for investors not to abandon the project and continue to invest in it. But very often it turns out that they are wrong. Business is a risk-accept it.
Jump to: