Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects. - page 4.

tambok

sr. member

Activity: 812

Merit: 260

Quote from: ittunes on January 06, 2020, 09:27:43 AM

Yes, Shit exchange is an end to a good project. How on Earth will a reputable and good quality project list on a shit exchange... A shit exchange shows the quality of project . Most of these ICO sweet mouth investors to invest and promise them to list on a good numbers of exchange only to get fund and dissapoint investors with shit exchanges. Every good and quality project must be able to list on a good numbers of exchange , with this investors will all smile and earn more profits

Aside from shitcoins, I am hoping that shit exchanges will also vanished as I think that we don't really need them in our life too,they are just a garbage in the cryptocurrency world, so we should avoid them too as much as possible so they will stop their operation. Remember that, exchange are in demand now, so scammers are buying some exchange too as their platform for them to raised fund.

ittunes

jr. member

Activity: 48

Merit: 1

Yes, Shit exchange is an end to a good project. How on Earth will a reputable and good quality project list on a shit exchange... A shit exchange shows the quality of project . Most of these ICO sweet mouth investors to invest and promise them to list on a good numbers of exchange only to get fund and dissapoint investors with shit exchanges. Every good and quality project must be able to list on a good numbers of exchange , with this investors will all smile and earn more profits

X-ray

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 524

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: heidikim on January 05, 2020, 04:18:59 PM

Shit coins suffer huge losses. And there's shit exchange. I wasn't too impressed. You need to invest very carefully. The coin project could be solid. However, if you invest in the wrong Exchange, you may lose your money.

Solid project doesn't mean anything if there's no marketplace for it to grow and if the exchange is really bad it could get affected and considered as bad project aswell. There are many solid project that share the same fate and then there's some useless project but got listed in popular exchange because it's IEO and got quite amount of trading volume.

Quote from: sorrros on January 05, 2020, 11:35:15 AM

But these exchanges are listing coins that are not avaiable on reputable exchanges like Binance, so that is the reason why people trade here, not because they get better conditions.

exactly but that also lower their standart to the point most of project listed there just become dumping ground and people won't trust any project in that exchange anymore.

boris singer

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 268

Quote from: ?? on ??

Because a small fee for the token listing fee is tempted by the team. Although it does not guarantee that the token will or will not end well. To order to get a good market capitalization there, at least the team will pay attention to exchanging high trading volume. Even though the price is quite high, it will at least pay off if the volume of trading is high. Maybe if a whale pumps the coin then it could be a decent start

many projects realize that their budgets can only come in at a small exchange, many developers are too rash in picking up revenue momentum. In many cases, they do not maintain volume and only wait for the movement of their coins in the market. if it is not as expected, it is they who ultimately become the most coin seller at the end of the story, that is the quality that is happening right now.

heidikim

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 100

Shit coins suffer huge losses. And there's shit exchange. I wasn't too impressed. You need to invest very carefully. The coin project could be solid. However, if you invest in the wrong Exchange, you may lose your money.

ubercool

hero member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 504

You might not know but visit any of the telegram groups of projects whose token is not listed anywhere, most of the comments on a normal day with be about when exchange..? The investors of ico used to put allot of pressure to list the coin on an exchange.

leea-1334

hero member

Activity: 2296

Merit: 953

Temporary forum vacation

Quote from: Pelana vreo on January 05, 2020, 08:43:45 AM

One reason makes sense, but if we talk about exchanges, it should be that when developers want to list tokens, they can choose not to register the tokens they have.
This year there are a lot of new projects running IEO, I think investors already know what they are choosing while making decisions in investing.

Or,,, go back to the good old days where developers did not care about listing and markets and simply just developed. When you continue to build and show people what you have, maybe people just decide on their own to trade it? Maybe exchanges decide on their own, hey we like this coin and we will list it, is that not how things used to work?

sorrros

full member

Activity: 954

Merit: 104

ludenaprotocol.io

But these exchanges are listing coins that are not avaiable on reputable exchanges like Binance, so that is the reason why people trade here, not because they get better conditions.

julius caesar

full member

Activity: 644

Merit: 127

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

They have a good project but they have wasted it and put their coin in the useless exchange. The effect of this is that the value of the coin that they have put in the exchange become lower and lower as time goes by. Instead of having a bright future it became useless every single day.

Sebas.tian

full member

Activity: 2100

Merit: 174

Basically many things that made most of these projects to list on shits-exchanges are raised funds during the ICO and IEO. Have be here some years now and saw many potential projects listed on the most shitest exchange just because they never reached their stipulated softcap and hardcap. These are just some reasons why they choose to list because of investors. Many projects have come and deceived many potential investors, so, none is ready to invest again.

SolarWindMiningCompany

hero member

Activity: 966

Merit: 502

Quote from: ProteinBar on January 05, 2020, 09:08:54 AM

You should continue to develop the project to be able to attract appropriate investors, so it is not good to exchange a switch in a hurry. Shit exchanges will kill the projects.

Quote from: mdzahed134 on January 05, 2020, 08:18:00 AM

Quote from: dcomomal on November 24, 2019, 01:12:38 PM

Nothing in the world harms the project more than listing on bad exchanges. Team members cannot even realise that with only one fault, they can ruin the whole project, especially such garbage exchanges as Latoken or Probit.

Projects team members definitely knows very well regarding potential exchanges. But they can't reach it there are many limitation such as they can't able to meet big exchanges demand. For those shit exchanges a huge number of promising projects going worst. And many real products based platform go to list shift exchanges but they are capable to list real exchanges.

The problem is contributed by a lot of factors and as you have rightly underlined, high cost of listing in top exchanges are a huge problem. Why should a developer pay as high as $200k to $500k to list on these exchanges, its way way over priced in my opinion and in most cases, the project developers are left with two options; a) list with such exorbitant fee and recover it by dumping team tokens on the community (just like matic) or b) list in an average or shit exchange and ride your luck

ProteinBar

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

You should continue to develop the project to be able to attract appropriate investors, so it is not good to exchange a switch in a hurry. Shit exchanges will kill the projects.

No One

jr. member

Activity: 417

Merit: 1

You are right on this subject. There are many instances of potential crypto projects with innovative ideas and strong team listing their coins on shit exchanges due to various reasons including to save listing charges. What such projects get at the end is only loss just because of being listed on bad exchanges. This is thoughtful thread.

fourpiece

full member

Activity: 821

Merit: 101

Quote from: soramon on December 06, 2019, 07:42:06 PM

Yeah i saw few good projects end with low quality exchange. I think there must be a reason why the project choosed that exchange. Maybe they dont have big fund to get better exchange or something else. Bad decision ruin the project it self.

yes thats right big exchanges are asking high amount before a project will be listed on thier exchange thats the reason why some good projects cant avail for.the listing so they list thier coin to unknown exchange or lets say shit exchanges were the journey of thier project ends.

DDante

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 19

Many new developers don't really understand the importance of exchange listing, some of them don't even know that fake volume exist in crypto soace, once an exchange looks good enough to them they just proceed and list of the exchange

KillerInk

newbie

Activity: 65

Merit: 0

We have many times because in a hurry to exchange, convert, and trade without careful thought leads to unintended great consequences. especially buried projects that may have been successful. IAM sorry.

superstrength

newbie

Activity: 64

Merit: 0

If you do not make good decisions, good discussions, then the projects that you intend to invest or exchange will be easy to end. If you feel that you cannot afford it, investing should not be very risky.

Pelana vreo

member

Activity: 744

Merit: 10

Syntrum.com

Quote from: Mealea on September 14, 2019, 01:30:18 AM

why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.

One reason makes sense, but if we talk about exchanges, it should be that when developers want to list tokens, they can choose not to register the tokens they have.
This year there are a lot of new projects running IEO, I think investors already know what they are choosing while making decisions in investing.

mdzahed134

sr. member

Activity: 2128

Merit: 259

SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM

Quote from: dcomomal on November 24, 2019, 01:12:38 PM

Nothing in the world harms the project more than listing on bad exchanges. Team members cannot even realise that with only one fault, they can ruin the whole project, especially such garbage exchanges as Latoken or Probit.

Projects team members definitely knows very well regarding potential exchanges. But they can't reach it there are many limitation such as they can't able to meet big exchanges demand. For those shit exchanges a huge number of promising projects going worst. And many real products based platform go to list shit exchanges but they are capable to list real exchanges.

awakpane

member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 12

Quote from: AndRE177 on October 19, 2019, 03:54:29 PM

Quote from: awakpane on October 14, 2019, 10:19:01 AM

It is unfortunate if good project coins sign up for bad luck. Moreover, lately many pesky exchanges have sprung up that only want to reap profits, thus making other people trading there losing. it looks like that unlucky exchange must be removed so that others don't lose.

In our power to ignore projects that we do not like, it's easy to do. Also, we can easily ignore the exchange, which for one reason or another are bad, thus we will deprive these exchanges earnings on commissions from our trade. So we are the power and we can decide.

I find it difficult to dismiss the project easily. because the project is good or not difficult to analyze. Sometimes what we think is good, in the end is far from the expectations we want. therefore we need sufficient analysis before making a decision.

Topic: Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects. - page 4. (Read 5381 times)