I think the biggest/main difference is consent.
I just cannot think that a kid is mature enough to give his consent to sexual intercourse with an adult.
In contrast your examples are usually about sex methods used by consenting adults.
Yes, and that is all the difference in the world, though pedophiles will argue this to the hilt, that adolescents can consent. Take a look at that chicken hawk documentary. Some of these people are extremely delusional and as I said I'm not going to defend pedophilia.
That is why you have laws defending defenseless children and defining what a pedophile is...
Exactly. That's what I'm saying. I think what society probably needs to do is realize that for pedophiles it's not a choice (I don't think, anyway), that pedophiles need to be trained not to act on those impulses else there will be consequences. But I don't believe in these extreme responses, like they all have to be killed or sterilized or whatever. People used to--and some still do--think the same way about fags, trannys, horse-fuckers, blowjobbers, and everyone else.
i agree. pedophiles should be educated to not have sexual intercourse with minors, but for rapist i think it is fine to sterilize them.
Bah, you're all braging about everything like moral and all...
It doesn't matter. Maybe in 100 years pedophilia will be a normal thing.
i dont think so.
kids are kids and it probaly wont change in the next 1000 years.
consent has nothing to do with society views - like how rape can never be ok.
