The ILGA fucked up big time there, no denying that. Had they not kicked them out when they did, the organization could have easily crumbled and fell down under the scrutiny that it did. The majority of the LGBT community does not support pedophilia, and the staff now on the board is vastly different.
The LGBT community is not a hivemind that supports something because a single organization fucked up over 20 years ago. The majority of LGBT organizations didn't even exist back then, much less support it. You'll always have some shit outliers, this one cleaned them out instead of just getting shut down by lack of support.
The title of this thread is not highlighting something that happened 20+ years ago, it's that the movements for pedo rights "marches on".
Can you tell us how all the people quoted and involved in this catastrophic gay-nambla cosy relation 20 years ago is not relevant now because you know for a fact they are all dead, with no direct political influence anymore?
"Marches on": in progress. No to be confused with "starting now". No time limits on when the movement started the march, and with whom...
"In progress" would mean they are currently progressing right now, and you brought no proof of that!
Why would anyone defend the rights of adults to abuse children is beyond me.
The same is beyond me, but the fact that nambla exists in the first place shows that there are people that would. Statistically there's gonna be pedos from every background and orientation. The church is a great example, I don't say every Christian supports pedophilia because of child porn going around in the Vatican, and it would be looked at as history if 25 years from now the issue is mostly gone except for some Christian people that also happen to be pedos.
I didn't say they were ALL dead, you twisted my words. Really the march for pedo rights is always going to be attempted by a few crazy fucks that want to be able to get with kids, what matters here is whether there are any signs of success and whether the attempts are in any way associated with LGBT people, in this example. So back on topic, find some sign that the march is actually doing 'going on' instead of having their feet stuck in the mud.
I'll keep updating this thread forever. Not to worry.
As you wish but please take care about your way of interpreting things. And give only objective facts please...
I do not interpret things. I copy paste. Your role is to interpret and make a judgement, accept it or reject it and move on. I do not judge people, calling them a bunch of crazies for example. I believe, according to the article, they have an objective and are still influential.
Obviously all my threads have a theme, but it is based on the vision of the original author, vision I share
or not share.
It is not my role to give
objective facts please... You do this withing your conscience.
Abusing children and be associated with people abusing children is criminal. I do not understand why it is so hard for some people to compute this.