Topic: Should BESTCHANGE pay proven willing scam facilitators like nutildah to post? - page 2. (Read 1113 times)

Make sure to quote me saying so because nutildah tends to not trust lying sockpuppets.

I didn't realize being married to a doctor is such an insult. I was under the impression that Doctors' spouses are generally proud of their spouses and their accomplishments.

The next time nutildah trolls me, I will try to remember to accuse him of being married to a doctor and that you say this is an insult.

I quoted you urging me to try the “educational” experience of LSD, and insulting my “ignorance” because I opine on the subject without trying it.  How is that not pushing me to use drugs?

It is very clear that you are unsatisfied with the acceptance of your natural right to ruin yourself:  You actively try to brainwash others into doing drugs, using the same peer-pressure tactics and sales spiel that street dealers use to suck people in.  It is immaterial that you are not literally in the same room with me, pushing an acid tab into my hand.  You push drug abuse as something glamorous, glorious—something that makes you better than those who reject this “experience”.  It is reprehensible, and you are a danger to society.

While everything else is just your usual butthurt nonsense, I do take offense to being called a "drug pusher."

You crossed the line from being just annoying to an actual piece of shit with that statement, but unlike you I'm not going to leave you a red trust for "defamation."

Back on ignore you go sweetie pie, have a terrific afternoon.

No, you lunatic:  nutildah is a drug pusher, who overtly evangelizes the use of hallucinogens such as LSD and psilocybin.

I am sure that you know this, because you saw fit to abuse your source merit privileges to reward nutildah’s LSD evangelism—including his statement to me that “nothing can prepare you for or educate you like the first-hand experience of trying a drug out for yourself.”  Quote-unquote.  That’s how to earn 4 merits from suchmoon!

Evidence is below.


This is just like when TECSHARE attacked you when you were defending him against me.  

It’s too bad that Quickseller wrote a nullius-sized wall of text, which is beyond your capability to read.  —Oh, wait.  Quickseller’s post was quite short.  It was, however, longer than 140 characters.  Are you literally unable to read anything longer than a tweet?

It is the only way that you could have failed to notice that Quickseller was making a principled defence of nutildah’s freedom of speech.  Not that such a “liberal” as you would understand the a concept; you love deplatforming!  Whereas Quickseller is so noble as to defend even vicious, despicable trolls from what he seems to view as a manifestation of one of cancel culture’s favourite strategies:  Getting people fired from their jobs.

For that, you lobbed a bunch of off-topic personal attacks at him.  You owe Quickseller an apology!


What, you mean nutildah’s long-term obsessive campaign of harassment against another forum member, based on an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory?  Wait a minute:  I thought that the suchmoon-nutildah narrative was that multiple different people independently noticed astounding evidence of The Truth...  But this discussion is off-topic.  Never mind.

OP, I am very sorry that some “people” are incapable of understanding the concept of “off-topic”.  It seems like the concept of off topic isn’t clicking with suchmoon, or she disagrees with the concept.  nutildah and suchmoon both need to learn to stop following around two particular forum members with these off-topic personal attacks!  Please don’t let off-topic personal attacks derail this thread from its topic about nutildah.

---

OP, for my part, I suggest that instead of attacking nutildah’s income, you should show more generally that nutildah is untrustworthy and has untrustworthy judgment.  Given that nutildah essentially acts like the lovechild of Timothy Leary and Saul Alinsky, that should be like shooting fish in a barrel.

---

Because I think that drug abuse accusations should be made with evidence, I will show evidence:

Quote from: nutildah on October 19, 2020, 02:58:33 AM

Quote from: nullius on October 19, 2020, 01:53:44 AM

They can turn you into a superstitious nitwit

No more superstitious than somebody who has never experienced psychedelics for themselves but label them as "bad" without fully understanding them.

Psychedelic drugs aren't addictive and can be quite educational if you let them work their magic.

Don't knock it until you've tried it.

Quote from: nutildah on October 19, 2020, 03:26:14 AM

nullius, all you are doing is highlighting your ignorance of the subject. have a fantastic morning.

Merited by suchmoon (4), strawbs (2), vapourminer (1), 600watt (1), sirazimuth (1), P_Shep (1), soullyG (1), OutOfMemory (1)

Quote from: nutildah on October 19, 2020, 08:16:28 AM

warning: nullius-sized post follows; I tried my best to keep it engaging

[...]

You've never tripped on LSD or mushrooms, you've never been to France, so there's no possible way you could know what its about more than someone who has. All the books in the world - all your personal assessments of friends who have visited France - are no substitute for first-hand, real life experience.

[...]

But nothing can prepare you for or educate you like the first-hand experience of trying a drug out for yourself.

[...]

Quote from: nullius on October 19, 2020, 03:19:43 AM

And there is a pretty good historical hypothesis that much religiosity has been caused by “naturally occurring” drugs—much more Amanita muscaria than psilocybin.  Hmmm.

Funny, I've done both and I'm still not religious. If anything they've opened my mind to the possibility that maybe I don't know everything and I don't have it all figured out.

[...long, long drug-abuse evangelism rant snipped for brevity...]

Gladly: The evidence in the link points to a human who almost made a mistake once upon a time.  You're continued effort to bludgeon him with it is a mistake that you keep making time after time.  The community has chosen their response to both.  We did so over two years ago...

Remember when you had a legendary account that was capable of registering in signature campaigns?  You blew that wad, and now you just jealous.

Yeah but does he have a pill addiction? Has he embezzled signature campaign funds? Is he married to a doctor? I can't believe you haven't made up anything more serious than "a troll" for someone who committed a grave crime of exposing your sockpuppet.

I am no fan of nutildah. I think he is a troll and will says things without basis in fact that other forum members are not willing to say publicly.

I also don't think it is appropriate to try to censor him based on his views. That is exactly what you are doing. You are trying to cut off his income because he does not share your views, and because you do not like him. That is wrong and is not something you should do. If you disagree with nutildah, you should debate him if he is willing to do so.

When nutildah tries to troll me, I will generally ignore him. I would suggest you do the same.

This is a great example of what a dumb fuck would conflate as reason and logic.

1. Doesn't attempt to read the referenced thread. Where it is clear it is regarding way more than selling your account.

2. Greater dumb fuckery.. you don't get scammers or scam facilitators for pay that would also be capable of highlighting other scams and scammers.


Welcome dumb fuck.


Of course the pharmacist is here grovelling around to boost his post count.
This moronic broke bum has been here for years and still has to sig spam for dust.

Doesn't tackle the provided evidence that nutildah is willing to facilitating scamming for 300bucks and then delete his post history when its pointed out.  Just starts his usual moronic slobbering that " none of the scumbag DT scammer supporters on DT care if other dt members scam or are willing to facilitate scamming for a fee.

Thanks dumb fucks for the bumps.

Now debunk the evidence in the link.


Nutildah the willing scam facilitator for pay who will delete his own post history to mask the facts and trust abuse anyone that mentions the truth about him.

He will only be allowed to post here if he is willing to engage in debate on his independently verifiable past actions here.

No plastering the thread with lies that this is a troll

Nutildah is a troll for claiming that although it has been conclusively debunked many times.

Come here and debate you broke down scam facilitating bum.

The fact that the DT team

1. Has not tagged him
2. Included him on DT
3. Accepts an early dash adopter and nem stake holder ( 300btc) who claimed he was never here to spam sigs
Is now broke, begging for 0.02btc loans and spamming sigs

Lol

Look at this pussy nutildah.

I CHALLENGE NUTILDAH TO DEFEND HIS PRIOR WILLING SCAM FACILITATING AND DELETING HIS OWN POST HISTORY TO HIDE THE FACT.

Why are you a broke bum nutildah? What happened to being a early dash adopter and being handed  MILLIONS  of dollars by NEM?  LOL

There’s nothing wrong with Bestchange, they are doing pretty well other than some issue which have already been resolved. OP here trying to defame nutildah, not Bestchange. His point is why bestchange paying nutildah who is a scam facilitators (according to OP).

What's interesting is that he linked to a thread by TOAA, which was an obvious alt account of cryptohunter--and I suspect OP is yet another, as he keeps trying to stir up old shit that nobody cares about except for him. 

I don't know a damn thing about Bestchange, by the way.  Is there a link somewhere in this thread pointing to the background on them or if I search in the Scam Accusation section, am I going to get a bunch of hits?  For the life of me I don't remember the name of that exchange (which is what I'm assuming it is). 

Nutildah is an upstanding member of the forum.  Even if he's promoting Bestchange (unless he knows it to be a scam).

Whoops, I almost missed a fun party here.

Yo, OP, let's see if I get this straight: you think bestchange made a mistake by employing Nutildah because he is a, quote unquote, scam facilitator, with your sole evidence and/or base argument is that he tried to sell his account... back in 2016?

Umm... two things: one, you asked people to read evidences before commenting here, but have you read the post right below that very "evidence"? And two, have you tried to, perhaps at your free time, look at his trust page? You know it's clickable and give you an access of his trust history, right? (mind blown much?) And I'm not talking about the one he received, I'm talking about the one he send. You know, the one where he tag scammers and effectively hunt and decimate them instead of facilitate them? Pretty much sure if he's a, quote unquote, scam facilitator, he should do the exact opposite.

Next evidence to be studied, please.

Thanks for the bump.
Sadly, the independently verifiable evidence undeniably debunks your empty claims.

Feel free to thrash out the details here. I'll be more than happy to help.
Here is the link again because may be you missed it.

Please specifically detail the points you want to debunk as untrue.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nutildah-willing-to-facilitate-scammers-for-around-300bucks-deleting-evidence-5190369

I see that also people may be wondering about the poll results. I will reveal them periodically here for those that haven't or couldn't vote but are still inquisitive.

Yes, nutildah is held in high esteem on bitcointalk.org. I have seen him scam hunting & connecting alts & bounty cheaters over the years. This thread has been created for no reason other than to flame nutildah. OP cut the crap out & find something better to do.

These are all great points.
So are you saying that if BESTCHANGE decides they can reach the community widely via paying a confirmed willing scam facilitator for pay who tries to delete their history to hide the fact then that would be fine because its their money?

BESTCHANGE maybe unaware. It would really be the responsibility of their campaign manager.
I wonder if they are aware and if so? Perhaps they need to be fired.

Did you contact them already before creating this thread? Or why even this thread? You can simply PM them and share what's on your mind and ask them politely whether they know about this or no. Why create this thread?
You are looking for community answer or Bestchange? If bestchange, try the above and if community, I think you should know the answer already. It’s bestchange money, it’s bestchange project, it’s bestchange advertising campaign. They better know whom they should hire for better reach to the community.

What are you confused about?

Ricky or Julian?  I'm confused here...

That's not what the person said who you tried to extort.
Stop telling lies.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.32414335

Where did your partners in grime go? Weird how both vanished.
Anyway keep chatting I enjoy it.

Don't tell me nutildah isn't a willing scam facilitator for pay who tried to delete the evidence either ?
Tell me some more fowlscatz. You are helping nutildah out no end.

Guess what, you are super fuckin' stupid. I've never scammed or extorted anybody ya fuckin idiot. Go suck horse cocks.