Topic: Should BESTCHANGE pay proven willing scam facilitators like nutildah to post? - page 3. (Read 1113 times)

This is purrrfect

Look who turns up the scammer protector and extortionist  owlcatz

Review his past here:) read and research.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/owlcatz-scammer-protector-extortionist-dishonest-trust-abuser-5286509

Look at the type of scum that we have here on DT excusing and colluding with others of a similar disposition.

Yuck.

Anyway they will scurry away now when you shine the light on them.
Owlcatz is probably looking to threaten some members parents to extort some money or something like that. Aka fowlScatz.

Anyway let's keep voting on BESTCHANGE paying proven willing scam facilitators for pay like nutildah.
Interesting votes so far.

You are obviously fucked in the head for producing irrefutable evidence of DT willing scammer facilitator for pay getting paid by BESTCHANGE? and asking why they are sponsoring scum like nutildah and not honest members?

Says fowlscatz.


...coldkey.EU.

Hmmm who are they paying to post here? Or who are they involved with?
Fowlscatz? That doesnt seem very sensible.

Not sure I would trust a company that works with extortionists.
I'll think about that more later perhaps.


Where is the attempt at defending nutildah? Where are the excuses?

Since you're a little pussy and will delete this anyhow here ya go, scammer...



Oh yeah... btw ....



https://archive.is/dTIbQ

You have some mins to remove that weird off topic picture. Else I will do it.
That will not ever be permitted to remain on this thread. Also do NOT repost it.
You shall obey fatty.

Why not try to mount a credible defense for Nutildah or BESTCHANGE?
OR

too afraid and know there is no excuse that will stand up to scrutiny?

Come on you love me tearing your flimsy excuses apart in public. Treat yourself.

Who are you?
Did you review the evidence ?

I clearly said read the evidence before making foolish comments.

Let me guess you didnt review the evidence did you?

I bet their campaign manager will be getting asked by BESTCHANGE why they are being associated with proven willing scam facilitators for pay. I bet they are unaware?

Nobody should be sponsoring proven willing scam facilitators for pay who try to hide the evidence by deleting their post history.
That is like condoning it.

Imagine a thread that says they condone and want to pay those willing to facilitating scamming other members here for a fee and then try to delete their post history when busted?

That would look terrible.

What's wrong with hiring honest members ?

I bet that campaign manager needs to look into that else he could be correctly seen as condoning willing scam facilitating for pay which would taint every project he works with ?

Or do you disagree?

Read the evidence fully before responding. Thanks.

Get a life.

READ THE EVIDENCE BEFORE TRYING TO EXCUSE THIS SCUMBAG.

I CHALLENGE NUTILDAH TO COME AND DEFEND HIMSELF NOT JUST COME HERE LIKE A COWARD POSTING PICS AND LIES ATTEMPTING TO CLAIM THIS IS TROLLING.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nutildah-willing-to-facilitate-scammers-for-around-300bucks-deleting-evidence-5190369

This post clearly details how the bitcointalk member nutildah the willing scam facilitator for pay is here being paid to post by
BESTCHANGE? Why?

Are BESTCHANGE aware they are paying a proven willing scam facilitator for pay who tried to delete his post history and hide that fact to post here on bitcointalk?

I will be asking them on their own thread shortly.

Those that have scammed, protected scammers or that have demonstrated they are willing to facilitate scams for a price and then try to delete their post history should be banned. If they are not banned they should certainly not be getting paid to post here by sponsors like BESTCHANGE.

Read the link posted at the top before you start lying and saying the bitcointalk member nutildah is not willing to facilitate scammers for a price.

Also read the part where he says he was never interested in having a banner or milking the forum for money.


Who is the campaign manager and do they know?
Have they reviewed the link and the evidence contained within ?

All discussion is invited. Should those that have demonstrated direct financially dangerous behaviors be forgiven and be paid to post here after a certain time frame? Or should honest members always be given priority?

BESTCHANGE  should let me know their thoughts.

You don't agree nutildah was willing to facilitate scammers for pay? Debunk the evidence in the link posted above.

Nutildah can post but only to address the on topic and relevant points. No derailing.