Try and sell it. People are paying crazy money for ASICs that are unlikely to meet ROI.
Unlikely to meet ROI?
Let's see... on June 23, 2012, when preorders were opened up for BFL ASICs, difficulty was around 1.8 million. Now, difficulty is just over 10 million. That's a 5.5x increase.
And yet, on June 23, 2012, the expected return on investment would have been calculated using $6 as the price per BTC. Now, the price is $140. That's a 23x increase.
So it's actually
4 times as profitable now as it was when preorders first opened up.BFL miners will be quite profitable for quite some time. BFL would have to ship around 1.75 MILLION Single SC's in order for it to be unprofitable to run a Single SC at $0.08/kwh.
And if the BTC exchange rate goes up to $1400 it would be a 230x increase in expected return on investment.
If the BTC exchange rate drops to $14, it would only be a 2.3 times increase in expected return.
Nobody knows what the exchange rate will be in the future. That is why people should talk about expected BTC mined from BFL products,
not USD expected from BFL mining. BTC expected from BFL mining is only 18% of what it was in Oct 2012.
More like 21%, but yes, I agree. What's your point? BFL never made any guarantees regarding how profitable their device would be. They never made any guarantees regarding difficulty or a certain number of BTC generated per day. They've always offered refunds to anyone who asked for one. And it has always been the choice of the customer to risk their money on a pre-order of promises.
The risks buying BFL hardware have been and still are:
1) the delivery date
2) the specs
3) the BTC/USD exchange rate
4) the network hashrate
5) reliability of the unit
Ordering a BFL unit (assuming it was delivered anywhere near spec and within 6 months) would probably be profitable. It probably would not be "wildly profitable" and there might be a better use of funds (Avalon, etc).
Back to the original quote I was responding to, which stated that "People are paying crazy money for ASICs that are unlikely to meet ROI." This person was clearly speaking of current prices (in USD) for ASICs. My response is that the notion that ASICs would not pay for themselves if ordered today is completely absurd, because it would take 1.75 million Single SC's shipped out before a BFL ASIC would become unprofitable to mine with at current prices. So somehow, FlappySocks thinks that BFL (or another ASIC vendor) is going to ship out 1.75 million units before a device ordered today would fully pay for itself. I'm just saying that that idea is flat-out wrong, unless FlappySocks expects the USD price of BTC to drop drastically. Looking from a USD perspective, a unit ordered today would most certainly pay for itself as long as the BTC price doesn't move downward.
The nature of most mining solutions (excluding electricity costs) is that they eventually pay for themselves. Even GPUs bought today might eventually pay for themselves. If people are paying "crazy money", then they are not paying list price. I think that poster was saying that the units ordered today are unlikely to meet the bubbly expectations of ROI that people currently have. Some combination of delays, spec miss, btc price, and hash rate rise will deflate those expectations dramatically.