Pages:
Author

Topic: Should there be a limit to how many times you can post a day? (Read 2789 times)

newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
"Off topic" in specialist forums is usually for people involved and interested in the main subject to discuss non core items. To go to a niche forum and only post in such areas seems to me bizarre behavior, but there's quite a lot of that about.
If signature campaigns see value in Off Topic posting why shouldn't they pay for it?

Regarding posting limits, any action like that would be fruitless and easy to circumvent in this environment, where account trading and multiple identities are acceptable.
True, but....the off topic is so covered in nonconstructive behavior. I'm not saying that's bad, because I feel we need a forum where we can kind of relax, have fun, be completely ridiculous and not be judged for it...I just don't understand why anyone would want to pay for "Do you like cheese?" and "Are you fat?" and "Am I the only girl here? Sad" I respect what you're saying, and understand it. Not everyone wants to pay for strict commentary, but I wouldn't understand the appeal behind that at all. Some people are different though, so I cannot argue with this.

As for the post restriction, I don't really believe it'll...completely be circumvented. Perhaps a little. Not too much. I assume most average people here only have maybe 2 or 3 alternate accounts. I have yet to even make my alternate accounts, but I don't know if it's a necessity to have several. I don't really believe in a post restriction, but if it could quite possibly stop spammers, it could be taken into consideration.

Campaigns don't really care about the posts themselves, most of them don't allow spammy posts because they know mods wont allow it. At the end of the day what matter is the signature, no matter how short or non-constructive a post is the sig for their site will still show and the more posts the more places it will show.
That can't possibly be true. That is unfair.

I'm surprised they don't pay more if you have already a lot of posts since everytime you change your signature it will change on all your previous posts aswell. Im sure the campaign signatures would not care a bit if their user spammed and mods wouldn't ban them and really the off-topic section might be the best section to promote something, everyone can check it out meanwhile not everyone will go to the gambling section.
I'm not going to argue so I will accept and respect what you believe but I am definitely not going to agree with it. It just isn't fair to the people that do what they can to make meaningful posts. Even though that's true, fine, I see where you're coming from. All that really matters is if the signature is advertised. Okay. Get paid to post nonconstructive behavior. People who run these campaigns should feel free to pay for whatever they want to pay for. Everyone needs to feel useful. YEAH! EQUALITY!
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
"Off topic" in specialist forums is usually for people involved and interested in the main subject to discuss non core items. To go to a niche forum and only post in such areas seems to me bizarre behavior, but there's quite a lot of that about.
If signature campaigns see value in Off Topic posting why shouldn't they pay for it?

Regarding posting limits, any action like that would be fruitless and easy to circumvent in this environment, where account trading and multiple identities are acceptable.
True, but....the off topic is so covered in nonconstructive behavior. I'm not saying that's bad, because I feel we need a forum where we can kind of relax, have fun, be completely ridiculous and not be judged for it...I just don't understand why anyone would want to pay for "Do you like cheese?" and "Are you fat?" and "Am I the only girl here? Sad" I respect what you're saying, and understand it. Not everyone wants to pay for strict commentary, but I wouldn't understand the appeal behind that at all. Some people are different though, so I cannot argue with this.

As for the post restriction, I don't really believe it'll...completely be circumvented. Perhaps a little. Not too much. I assume most average people here only have maybe 2 or 3 alternate accounts. I have yet to even make my alternate accounts, but I don't know if it's a necessity to have several. I don't really believe in a post restriction, but if it could quite possibly stop spammers, it could be taken into consideration.

Campaigns don't really care about the posts themselves, most of them don't allow spammy posts because they know mods wont allow it. At the end of the day what matter is the signature, no matter how short or non-constructive a post is the sig for their site will still show and the more posts the more places it will show.
That can't possibly be true. That is unfair.

I'm surprised they don't pay more if you have already a lot of posts since everytime you change your signature it will change on all your previous posts aswell. Im sure the campaign signatures would not care a bit if their user spammed and mods wouldn't ban them and really the off-topic section might be the best section to promote something, everyone can check it out meanwhile not everyone will go to the gambling section.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
"Off topic" in specialist forums is usually for people involved and interested in the main subject to discuss non core items. To go to a niche forum and only post in such areas seems to me bizarre behavior, but there's quite a lot of that about.
If signature campaigns see value in Off Topic posting why shouldn't they pay for it?

Regarding posting limits, any action like that would be fruitless and easy to circumvent in this environment, where account trading and multiple identities are acceptable.
True, but....the off topic is so covered in nonconstructive behavior. I'm not saying that's bad, because I feel we need a forum where we can kind of relax, have fun, be completely ridiculous and not be judged for it...I just don't understand why anyone would want to pay for "Do you like cheese?" and "Are you fat?" and "Am I the only girl here? Sad" I respect what you're saying, and understand it. Not everyone wants to pay for strict commentary, but I wouldn't understand the appeal behind that at all. Some people are different though, so I cannot argue with this.

As for the post restriction, I don't really believe it'll...completely be circumvented. Perhaps a little. Not too much. I assume most average people here only have maybe 2 or 3 alternate accounts. I have yet to even make my alternate accounts, but I don't know if it's a necessity to have several. I don't really believe in a post restriction, but if it could quite possibly stop spammers, it could be taken into consideration.

Campaigns don't really care about the posts themselves, most of them don't allow spammy posts because they know mods wont allow it. At the end of the day what matter is the signature, no matter how short or non-constructive a post is the sig for their site will still show and the more posts the more places it will show.
That can't possibly be true. That is unfair.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
"Off topic" in specialist forums is usually for people involved and interested in the main subject to discuss non core items. To go to a niche forum and only post in such areas seems to me bizarre behavior, but there's quite a lot of that about.
If signature campaigns see value in Off Topic posting why shouldn't they pay for it?

Regarding posting limits, any action like that would be fruitless and easy to circumvent in this environment, where account trading and multiple identities are acceptable.
True, but....the off topic is so covered in nonconstructive behavior. I'm not saying that's bad, because I feel we need a forum where we can kind of relax, have fun, be completely ridiculous and not be judged for it...I just don't understand why anyone would want to pay for "Do you like cheese?" and "Are you fat?" and "Am I the only girl here? Sad" I respect what you're saying, and understand it. Not everyone wants to pay for strict commentary, but I wouldn't understand the appeal behind that at all. Some people are different though, so I cannot argue with this.

As for the post restriction, I don't really believe it'll...completely be circumvented. Perhaps a little. Not too much. I assume most average people here only have maybe 2 or 3 alternate accounts. I have yet to even make my alternate accounts, but I don't know if it's a necessity to have several. I don't really believe in a post restriction, but if it could quite possibly stop spammers, it could be taken into consideration.

Campaigns don't really care about the posts themselves, most of them don't allow spammy posts because they know mods wont allow it. At the end of the day what matter is the signature, no matter how short or non-constructive a post is the sig for their site will still show and the more posts the more places it will show.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
"Off topic" in specialist forums is usually for people involved and interested in the main subject to discuss non core items. To go to a niche forum and only post in such areas seems to me bizarre behavior, but there's quite a lot of that about.
If signature campaigns see value in Off Topic posting why shouldn't they pay for it?

Regarding posting limits, any action like that would be fruitless and easy to circumvent in this environment, where account trading and multiple identities are acceptable.
True, but....the off topic is so covered in nonconstructive behavior. I'm not saying that's bad, because I feel we need a forum where we can kind of relax, have fun, be completely ridiculous and not be judged for it...I just don't understand why anyone would want to pay for "Do you like cheese?" and "Are you fat?" and "Am I the only girl here? Sad" I respect what you're saying, and understand it. Not everyone wants to pay for strict commentary, but I wouldn't understand the appeal behind that at all. Some people are different though, so I cannot argue with this.

As for the post restriction, I don't really believe it'll...completely be circumvented. Perhaps a little. Not too much. I assume most average people here only have maybe 2 or 3 alternate accounts. I have yet to even make my alternate accounts, but I don't know if it's a necessity to have several. I don't really believe in a post restriction, but if it could quite possibly stop spammers, it could be taken into consideration.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
"Off topic" in specialist forums is usually for people involved and interested in the main subject to discuss non core items. To go to a niche forum and only post in such areas seems to me bizarre behavior, but there's quite a lot of that about.
If signature campaigns see value in Off Topic posting why shouldn't they pay for it?

Regarding posting limits, any action like that would be fruitless and easy to circumvent in this environment, where account trading and multiple identities are acceptable.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
I think we should go on a first come first serve basis for who gets to make the first and only 20 sarcastic comments for the day, then the people that don't make the cut will just have to check in earlier tomorrow to get an opportunity to post a sarcastic comment.


 Now that's sarcasm, Mexxer.
Heh.
@Fwdxlsh i want to ask you
should there be a limit to how many times you can send your bitcoin a day ?  Roll Eyes

How about not posting irrelevant posts with a paid signature?


ohh sorry if im wrong , I want to compare the concept of freedom in the bitcoin
i can delete that coment if my posting irrelevant with topic


do you want me to delete that coment ?
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1005
4 Mana 7/7
I think we should go on a first come first serve basis for who gets to make the first and only 20 sarcastic comments for the day, then the people that don't make the cut will just have to check in earlier tomorrow to get an opportunity to post a sarcastic comment.


 Now that's sarcasm, Mexxer.
Heh.
@Fwdxlsh i want to ask you
should there be a limit to how many times you can send your bitcoin a day ?  Roll Eyes

How about not posting irrelevant posts with a paid signature?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
@Fwdxlsh i want to ask you
should there be a limit to how many times you can send your bitcoin a day ?  Roll Eyes

No, but I think there should be a limit to how many people use emoticons.

They make me uncomfortable. And there should be a limit to how many people make a sarcastic comment a day. I think we should go on a first come first serve basis for who gets to make the first and only 20 sarcastic comments for the day, then the people that don't make the cut will just have to check in earlier tomorrow to get an opportunity to post a sarcastic comment.


 Now that's sarcasm, Mexxer.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
@Fwdxlsh i want to ask you
should there be a limit to how many times you can send your bitcoin a day ?  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1005
4 Mana 7/7
Okay thank you. I also want some other features getting passed, but I don't know if you want to hear them. Do you?

Edit: your signature is lovely.
Well if it is interesting and doable, why not? List them here and I'll have a look.
And thanks, well not good enough I'd say , searching for another noteworthy "news" to put up on my signature.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Actually, I wasn't being sarcastic. I think signatures shouldn't be counted in off topic. I'm serious.
Ah well thats something only the admins can inforce, and AFAIK they will not bother with it. You should make a new thread in "New forum software" if you'd like to see it on the new forum though, if it gains enough support from members it might be included in the list of coming features.
Okay thank you. I also want some other features getting passed, but I don't know if you want to hear them. Do you?

Edit: your signature is lovely.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1005
4 Mana 7/7
Actually, I wasn't being sarcastic. I think signatures shouldn't be counted in off topic. I'm serious.
Ah well thats something only the admins can inforce, and AFAIK they will not bother with it. You should make a new thread in "New forum software" if you'd like to see it on the new forum though, if it gains enough support from members it might be included in the list of coming features.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
They are non constructive, but why does every statement have to be extremely constructive?
Because spam is supposed to be moderated.
While we're at it, we should cancel posts made in off topic from ever being counted as a paid post for people with signature campaigns.
I believe that was sarcasm in your post, but I am in support of not showing signature in Off-topic board, that would hugely reduce non-constructive signature spam.
I think that's a good idea. Because Lauda is very upset about that, and I don't enjoy when staff is upset.
Sarcasm it was.


Actually, I wasn't being sarcastic. I think signatures shouldn't be counted in off topic. I'm serious.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1005
4 Mana 7/7
They are non constructive, but why does every statement have to be extremely constructive?
Because spam is supposed to be moderated.
While we're at it, we should cancel posts made in off topic from ever being counted as a paid post for people with signature campaigns.
I believe that was sarcasm in your post, but I am in support of not showing signature in Off-topic board, that would hugely reduce non-constructive signature spam.
I think that's a good idea. Because Lauda is very upset about that, and I don't enjoy when staff is upset.
Sarcasm it was.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Exactly.

Lauda is not understanding this way of thinking. Also, we need that off topic forum to entice people that don't know of Bitcoin into the forum. Diversity in people is a big step in having Bitcoin grow.
Posts in Politics and society are constructive posts, while the ones Lauda is probably talking about are posts in "How long have you logged in" or "What was the last drink you drank" etc, there the posts are highly non-constructive which are mostly made for farming account or getting paid from signature campaign while doing the least amount of work.
They are non constructive, but why does every statement have to be extremely constructive?

The off topic forum is already laid back. We should keep it laid back. While we're at it, we should cancel posts made in off topic from ever being counted as a paid post for people with signature campaigns.


I think that's a good idea. Because Lauda is very upset about that, and I don't enjoy when staff is upset.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1005
4 Mana 7/7
Exactly.

Lauda is not understanding this way of thinking. Also, we need that off topic forum to entice people that don't know of Bitcoin into the forum. Diversity in people is a big step in having Bitcoin grow.
Posts in Politics and society are constructive posts, while the ones Lauda is probably talking about are posts in "How long have you logged in" or "What was the last drink you drank" etc, there the posts are highly non-constructive which are mostly made for farming account or getting paid from signature campaign while doing the least amount of work.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
There are already post time restrictions for newbies and mostly only newbies spam the forum while others who spam get reported and then banned. By restricting them to post few times a day is meaningless. Until and unless they are posting meaningfull posts, they don't need to be restricted (There are senior members managing campaigns and other sites here and they would need to make many posts a day. It would be unfair to them if they have any restriction on posting).
Lauda said he wants people to stop posting so much if it has no relevance to Bitcoin. He also said that posting in off-topic is bad, and implied that anyone posting a lot in off-topic should be banned.


I was just trying to help with some kind of idea, but I understand where you're coming from.

Then what about Politics & Society? Does religion and other controversial topics have anything to do with bitcoin? Then why do we have these sections which aren't related to bitcoin? Answer is obvious because people should be able to discuss what they want in those topics. I don't agree with Lauda but I do agree that users do spam there. However, since those sections are excluded from most signature campaigns, people who spam there are either interested in posting there or they are just trolling.
Exactly.

Lauda is not understanding this way of thinking. Also, we need that off topic forum to entice people that don't know of Bitcoin into the forum. Diversity in people is a big step in having Bitcoin grow.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
There are already post time restrictions for newbies and mostly only newbies spam the forum while others who spam get reported and then banned. By restricting them to post few times a day is meaningless. Until and unless they are posting meaningfull posts, they don't need to be restricted (There are senior members managing campaigns and other sites here and they would need to make many posts a day. It would be unfair to them if they have any restriction on posting).
Lauda said he wants people to stop posting so much if it has no relevance to Bitcoin. He also said that posting in off-topic is bad, and implied that anyone posting a lot in off-topic should be banned.


I was just trying to help with some kind of idea, but I understand where you're coming from.

Then what about Politics & Society? Does religion and other controversial topics have anything to do with bitcoin? Then why do we have these sections which aren't related to bitcoin? Answer is obvious because people should be able to discuss what they want in those topics. I don't agree with Lauda but I do agree that users do spam there. However, since those sections are excluded from most signature campaigns, people who spam there are either interested in posting there or they are just trolling.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
This user is really rude and spreading too much hate.
What did I say that seemed like hatred? I do genuinely feel apologetic about it, but I don't mean to hurt anyone.
Pages:
Jump to: