Topic: Should there be a limit to how many times you can post a day? - page 2. (Read 2789 times)
December 01, 2015, 08:06:49 PM
This user is really rude and spreading too much hate.
December 01, 2015, 08:00:38 PM
.... least I see that some people do appreciate me and my efforts. 
I think you are reading some of these posts wrong. Where are you seeing people who are appreciative for your postings?
I honestly don't think there are any out there. All I'm thankful for is you stopped using bold and massive font, guessing mods had something to do with this.
December 01, 2015, 07:29:07 PM
I'm glad you feel this way. That is why a special lady is now unbanned. 
If you don't like her, my recommendation is to put her on ignore. Just like how I put Gleb on ignore.
The way that I feel is pretty similar to the way that it works. You can feel free to ask any staff member. If you don't like her, my recommendation is to put her on ignore. Just like how I put Gleb on ignore.
Also, thank you for bringing up a completely irrelevant subject. Try to come up with something relevant to the topic at hand, especially when talking about off topic posters.
I don't mind posting like this. Lauda minds though, so I'm speaking for Lauda.
You either misunderstood or you're deliberately trying to be awkward. By the way you've tried to call out Lauda for essentially nothing before it looks that you have a bit of a grudge on them for some reason.Talking about the forum or Bitcoin its self is no problem as long as what you're talking about has some relevance. Hence why posts like this are allowed, hence why the entire Meta section exists. Going to the Off Topic section and posting on 'What drink did you last drink' every day to boost your post count is not adding to anything whatsoever, as no one cares about what you post there.
God is able. God is good.
I don't understand. I care for this community. Do what you can to help the community, for I am helping. We are strong when we are together as family coming up with ways to make this site better. Actually some people hurt more then they help on being a member of the community. With how you have threads in meta and lock them. Post in huge font, or calling out Lauda.... you are just not really helping.
If you want to help bitcoin community I suggest leaving meta alone for a while. I think it's best for all. This thread will go no where, they are not going to limit posts. And there are valid points for not doing it to.
Trying in itself is good. I do try a lot. I try all the time in this institution. And I pray. Oh my god, I pray. I pray every single day for revolution.
I am sorry. I tried as hard as I could to help. I really am trying, but I was hoping that I was appreciated. At least I see that some people do appreciate me and my efforts.
December 01, 2015, 07:13:12 PM
I'm glad you feel this way. That is why a special lady is now unbanned.
If you don't like her, my recommendation is to put her on ignore. Just like how I put Gleb on ignore.
The way that I feel is pretty similar to the way that it works. You can feel free to ask any staff member. If you don't like her, my recommendation is to put her on ignore. Just like how I put Gleb on ignore.
Also, thank you for bringing up a completely irrelevant subject. Try to come up with something relevant to the topic at hand, especially when talking about off topic posters.
I don't mind posting like this. Lauda minds though, so I'm speaking for Lauda.
You either misunderstood or you're deliberately trying to be awkward. By the way you've tried to call out Lauda for essentially nothing before it looks that you have a bit of a grudge on them for some reason.Talking about the forum or Bitcoin its self is no problem as long as what you're talking about has some relevance. Hence why posts like this are allowed, hence why the entire Meta section exists. Going to the Off Topic section and posting on 'What drink did you last drink' every day to boost your post count is not adding to anything whatsoever, as no one cares about what you post there.
God is able. God is good.
I don't understand. I care for this community. Do what you can to help the community, for I am helping. We are strong when we are together as family coming up with ways to make this site better. Actually some people hurt more then they help on being a member of the community. With how you have threads in meta and lock them. Post in huge font, or calling out Lauda.... you are just not really helping.
If you want to help bitcoin community I suggest leaving meta alone for a while. I think it's best for all. This thread will go no where, they are not going to limit posts. And there are valid points for not doing it to.
December 01, 2015, 05:58:17 PM
I'm glad you feel this way. That is why a special lady is now unbanned.
If you don't like her, my recommendation is to put her on ignore. Just like how I put Gleb on ignore.
The way that I feel is pretty similar to the way that it works. You can feel free to ask any staff member. If you don't like her, my recommendation is to put her on ignore. Just like how I put Gleb on ignore.
Also, thank you for bringing up a completely irrelevant subject. Try to come up with something relevant to the topic at hand, especially when talking about off topic posters.
I don't mind posting like this. Lauda minds though, so I'm speaking for Lauda.
You either misunderstood or you're deliberately trying to be awkward. By the way you've tried to call out Lauda for essentially nothing before it looks that you have a bit of a grudge on them for some reason.Talking about the forum or Bitcoin its self is no problem as long as what you're talking about has some relevance. Hence why posts like this are allowed, hence why the entire Meta section exists. Going to the Off Topic section and posting on 'What drink did you last drink' every day to boost your post count is not adding to anything whatsoever, as no one cares about what you post there.
God is able. God is good.
I don't understand. I care for this community. Do what you can to help the community, for I am helping. We are strong when we are together as family coming up with ways to make this site better. 
December 01, 2015, 05:55:37 PM
I'm glad you feel this way. That is why a special lady is now unbanned.
If you don't like her, my recommendation is to put her on ignore. Just like how I put Gleb on ignore.
The way that I feel is pretty similar to the way that it works. You can feel free to ask any staff member. If you don't like her, my recommendation is to put her on ignore. Just like how I put Gleb on ignore.
Also, thank you for bringing up a completely irrelevant subject. Try to come up with something relevant to the topic at hand, especially when talking about off topic posters.
I don't mind posting like this. Lauda minds though, so I'm speaking for Lauda.
You either misunderstood or you're deliberately trying to be awkward. By the way you've tried to call out Lauda for essentially nothing before it looks that you have a bit of a grudge on them for some reason.Talking about the forum or Bitcoin its self is no problem as long as what you're talking about has some relevance. Hence why posts like this are allowed, hence why the entire Meta section exists. Going to the Off Topic section and posting on 'What drink did you last drink' every day to boost your post count is not adding to anything whatsoever, as no one cares about what you post there.
December 01, 2015, 05:50:41 PM
Lauda said he wants people to stop posting so much if it has no relevance to Bitcoin. He also said that posting in off-topic is bad, and implied that anyone posting a lot in off-topic should be banned.
I was just trying to help with some kind of idea, but I understand where you're coming from.
I was just trying to help with some kind of idea, but I understand where you're coming from.
This doesn't actually relate to Bitcoin! Does it? So if you are tired of people posting about topics not relevant to Bitcoin, don't post ones yourself that don't relate to Bitcoin!
I don't mind posting like this. Lauda minds though, so I'm speaking for Lauda.
December 01, 2015, 05:44:15 PM
Lauda said he wants people to stop posting so much if it has no relevance to Bitcoin. He also said that posting in off-topic is bad, and implied that anyone posting a lot in off-topic should be banned.
I was just trying to help with some kind of idea, but I understand where you're coming from.
I was just trying to help with some kind of idea, but I understand where you're coming from.
This doesn't actually relate to Bitcoin! Does it? So if you are tired of people posting about topics not relevant to Bitcoin, don't post ones yourself that don't relate to Bitcoin!
December 01, 2015, 05:42:00 PM
Definitely NOT!
The moderators, administrators and staff are the users that post the most, and they need to post this amount to keep on top of their work!
So a ban would stop the forum from functioning properly.
Also: people would migrate to sites like Reddit and other forums.
The moderators, administrators and staff are the users that post the most, and they need to post this amount to keep on top of their work!
So a ban would stop the forum from functioning properly.
Also: people would migrate to sites like Reddit and other forums.
December 01, 2015, 05:39:11 PM
Lauda said he wants people to stop posting so much if it has no relevance to Bitcoin.
Which is true, especially so if the user has a paid signature. If all of your contributions to the forum is just spamming in Off Topic you shouldn't be here.He also said that posting in off-topic is bad, and implied that anyone posting a lot in off-topic should be banned.
This is dependent. Accounts such as Gleb's and Phinnaeus's have a large amount of posts in Off Topic, but they have provided enough elsewhere to the forums to warrant it. Users that do nothing but spam in Off Topic shouldn't be here.I was just trying to help with some kind of idea, but I understand where you're coming from.
It's not too great of an idea, similar to a lot of your others. It isn't about how much you post per day, it's about the quality of the posts made. If you don't like her, my recommendation is to put her on ignore. Just like how I put Gleb on ignore.
December 01, 2015, 05:23:08 PM
Lauda said he wants people to stop posting so much if it has no relevance to Bitcoin.
Which is true, especially so if the user has a paid signature. If all of your contributions to the forum is just spamming in Off Topic you shouldn't be here.He also said that posting in off-topic is bad, and implied that anyone posting a lot in off-topic should be banned.
This is dependent. Accounts such as Gleb's and Phinnaeus's have a large amount of posts in Off Topic, but they have provided enough elsewhere to the forums to warrant it. Users that do nothing but spam in Off Topic shouldn't be here.I was just trying to help with some kind of idea, but I understand where you're coming from.
It's not too great of an idea, similar to a lot of your others. It isn't about how much you post per day, it's about the quality of the posts made. December 01, 2015, 04:27:28 PM
There are already post time restrictions for newbies and mostly only newbies spam the forum while others who spam get reported and then banned. By restricting them to post few times a day is meaningless. Until and unless they are posting meaningfull posts, they don't need to be restricted (There are senior members managing campaigns and other sites here and they would need to make many posts a day. It would be unfair to them if they have any restriction on posting).
Lauda said he wants people to stop posting so much if it has no relevance to Bitcoin. He also said that posting in off-topic is bad, and implied that anyone posting a lot in off-topic should be banned.I was just trying to help with some kind of idea, but I understand where you're coming from.
December 01, 2015, 02:29:50 PM
There are already post time restrictions for newbies and mostly only newbies spam the forum while others who spam get reported and then banned. By restricting them to post few times a day is meaningless. Until and unless they are posting meaningfull posts, they don't need to be restricted (There are senior members managing campaigns and other sites here and they would need to make many posts a day. It would be unfair to them if they have any restriction on posting).
December 01, 2015, 11:38:58 AM
I can see where this is coming from. It's to stop spamming. It's not going to work, people can buy accounts and they have double post quota.
The idea is stupid, it's not going to stop spamming, say the limit is 30 posts, not many people do 30 posts per day. Someone who spams everyday will still spam, he wont even notice the limit because he does not post more than 30 posts a day. The only way to stop spam is to have a few mods or people searching for spammers everyday, ban sig campaigns like yobit or give them a warning to do something about their spammers.
November 30, 2015, 09:18:18 PM
I can see where this is coming from. It's to stop spamming. It's not going to work, people can buy accounts and they have double post quota.
November 30, 2015, 09:13:29 PM
Please. Stop spamming the forum. I've seen your name enough times authoring so many shitposts to last me a lifetime.
There really shouldn't, because done people actually contribute to the forum, instead of spam it. I just guess we'll have to live with spammers.
Koff koff
I guess spam means "posting a lot" to you. With that being said, maybe a post restriction is your best bet.There really shouldn't, because done people actually contribute to the forum, instead of spam it. I just guess we'll have to live with spammers.
Koff koff
Either way, I am placing you on ignore for the rudeness.
Well generally when you talk about spam here means someone who posts a lot of non constructive posts. What tarsua said it's a pretty valid point too. Site owners will often post a lot in the same thread to communicate with their users.
If I do recall correctly, the meaning of constructive from the English language is doing actions that can help people. In this case I am creating a way to possibly stop people who post a lot. In the OP, I quoted somebody that didn't appreciate somebody posting a lot. So, I came up with the idea of a post restriction.
I would say that is me being constructive. Unfortunately, your idea of constructive and my idea of it would be different. That doesn't mean that I deserve to be insulted. Insulting people would be trolling them, which I do not condone. If you don't appreciate my posts, it doesn't make sense to continue reading them, which means they only click on them to upset me. With that being said, I have placed those people on ignore.
I think a lot of ideas of good posts and yours are different. How many posts have you done in huge font mods have went through and fixed? One could argue that is wasting mods time.
Number of posts is such a individual thing. I'm normally on it all day some are on 10 minutes a day. You can not really say X number of posts is max good posts. As some have good posts, and others are utter crap.
You should still be seeing it but the timer is one of the best things to stop crap posts. It makes it where you have to wait to post on lower accounts. This makes perfect sense and stops someone from being able to spam in every forum. Normally it's caught in just a few.
November 30, 2015, 06:29:14 PM
Please. Stop spamming the forum. I've seen your name enough times authoring so many shitposts to last me a lifetime.
There really shouldn't, because done people actually contribute to the forum, instead of spam it. I just guess we'll have to live with spammers.
Koff koff
I guess spam means "posting a lot" to you. With that being said, maybe a post restriction is your best bet.There really shouldn't, because done people actually contribute to the forum, instead of spam it. I just guess we'll have to live with spammers.
Koff koff
Either way, I am placing you on ignore for the rudeness.
Well generally when you talk about spam here means someone who posts a lot of non constructive posts. What tarsua said it's a pretty valid point too. Site owners will often post a lot in the same thread to communicate with their users.
If I do recall correctly, the meaning of constructive from the English language is doing actions that can help people. In this case I am creating a way to possibly stop people who post a lot. In the OP, I quoted somebody that didn't appreciate somebody posting a lot. So, I came up with the idea of a post restriction.
I would say that is me being constructive. Unfortunately, your idea of constructive and my idea of it would be different. That doesn't mean that I deserve to be insulted. Insulting people would be trolling them, which I do not condone. If you don't appreciate my posts, it doesn't make sense to continue reading them, which means they only click on them to upset me. With that being said, I have placed those people on ignore.
November 30, 2015, 02:36:58 AM
Please. Stop spamming the forum. I've seen your name enough times authoring so many shitposts to last me a lifetime.
There really shouldn't, because done people actually contribute to the forum, instead of spam it. I just guess we'll have to live with spammers.
Koff koff
I guess spam means "posting a lot" to you. With that being said, maybe a post restriction is your best bet.There really shouldn't, because done people actually contribute to the forum, instead of spam it. I just guess we'll have to live with spammers.
Koff koff
Either way, I am placing you on ignore for the rudeness.
Well generally when you talk about spam here means someone who posts a lot of non constructive posts. What tarsua said it's a pretty valid point too. Site owners will often post a lot in the same thread to communicate with their users.
If I do recall correctly, the meaning of constructive from the English language is doing actions that can help people. In this case I am creating a way to possibly stop people who post a lot. In the OP, I quoted somebody that didn't appreciate somebody posting a lot. So, I came up with the idea of a post restriction.
I would say that is me being constructive. Unfortunately, your idea of constructive and my idea of it would be different. That doesn't mean that I deserve to be insulted. Insulting people would be trolling them, which I do not condone. If you don't appreciate my posts, it doesn't make sense to continue reading them, which means they only click on them to upset me. With that being said, I have placed those people on ignore.
The board is not your parent. Should it stop after X post... no as some are very active and do have useful posts. It has things to prevent just pure spam such as posting limits with time in between. This is something good as chances are after a few you are reported and deleted.
Do I wish the board would stop you from posting in huge bold font? Yes I do... but they leave it open in case there is a good use of it. FYI your using to big of font, and bold on post's that don't need it.
My past posts that are like this have never been deleted. Until they are all deleted, I can assume posting in bold text is against the rules. But that wouldn't make sense when there is no rule book here. It is not even in the unofficial rules at BitcoinTalk. Don't worry though; I only do this when it seems as though people are not seeing my perfectly fine explanations. Not to say that this will help them understand them, but it'll definitely help them see them.
The posting in massive bold font is not really a good thing. They cannot have a rule as some posts use it to their advantages like sections or titles, etc. But just to type a massive post in big font so it sticks out is not the right reason.
Just that past are still there is not a good thing to prove it's ok. Likely it means just no one reported them. I would be suprised if you get to keep on posting with huge font. But I guess I don't write the rules so I could be wrong.
November 29, 2015, 10:57:32 PM
It depends on the limit but I don't like the idea. Honest users like me sometime post a lot in one day because there's a great thread with plenty of replies back and forth. Or we may simply have more free time.
However I can see how a high limit can be introduced, above 50-75 posts for example, not sure if that will actually help but you know. Like others have said, it's a job for moderators, spammers will spam no matter what...
However I can see how a high limit can be introduced, above 50-75 posts for example, not sure if that will actually help but you know. Like others have said, it's a job for moderators, spammers will spam no matter what...
November 29, 2015, 10:51:59 PM
No 
Because there should always be an Job for an Admin i guess Anyways maybe there should be an Block Modus for Users they are simply posting to much.
I mean about 500 posts a Day cannot be normal but io dont know what other people are doing
regards
lama-hunter
Because there should always be an Job for an Admin i guess Anyways maybe there should be an Block Modus for Users they are simply posting to much.I mean about 500 posts a Day cannot be normal but io dont know what other people are doing
regards
lama-hunter
Jump to: