Definitely no. Such suggestions will never be enforced. I'll let someone else explain it to you (which probably won't help anyways).
I agree.It will cause havoc, no doubt about this.
Topic: Should there be a limit to how many times you can post a day? - page 4. (Read 2789 times)
It will cause havoc, no doubt about this.
Can you stop posting controversial shitthreads then locking them when they don't go your way.
Correct.. This guy is posting many shit threads..
Instead of posting such type of threads again and again why dont you PM to a staff member like Cyrus or hilariousandco they reply very fast.
And If u keep making such threads again and again with silly questions IT IS CONSIDERED TO BE SPAM !!
you are making so many threads to draw people's attention towards you.
Dont Do that mate!
Can you stop posting controversial shitthreads then locking them when they don't go your way.
why would you limit them? if it's spam then you can, but if the post are legit and it's helpful, won't that defeat the purpose of a forum?
Definitely no. Such suggestions will never be enforced. I'll let someone else explain it to you (which probably won't help anyways).
And when I say that, this is a proposal where the site has automatic scripting where the website just simply refuses to let you post a certain amount of times per day.
This guy has 325 posts and 476 potential activity, if you don't know what this means then read the stickied threads here... To make things simple for you he could spam another 150 posts and get another 150 activity on 1 day (before the ban he won +85 activities in 3 hours)
Well then.
The scripting of the website should be smarter then. As far as I am concerned, it is more than possible to simply code the website in a way where you cannot post a certain amount of times per day, or you cannot gain a certain amount of activity in a week. The automatic posting delay for new accounts is in full effect, which indicates that the possibility of placing that proposal into effect as well is more than possible.
I don't understand. If you don't like a user, it is best to just place them on ignore instead of antagonizing them. The only time you should post about a user is when they're doing an act or posting comments that are questionable. To me, this is not an issue. They haven't done anything too terrible. I don't recall of there being a rule that you are not allowed to post a certain amount of times per day. If there is a rule, please show me it.
You all just want to antagonize this user, and I will not condone this behavior. Other than posting that red text repeatedly, they're doing nothing wrong.
For some reason, this user has been fed overall incorrect information. Here, I have given him the proper information.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-definitive-explanation-of-how-activity-works-495948
Just a quick PSA to anyone that is annoyed by somebody's posts: it is best to just place them on ignore instead of antagonizing them. I did that with Quickseller, Vod, Gleb Gamow, jacee, dogie, Hariom, and some other people/trolls. If there's no proof that they're doing anything too terrible and you talk negatively about them, then you dislike them on a personal level. Which means it is best to just ignore them.
There is a two-four week waiting period for only a certain amount of posts to be counted into your activity.
This guy has 325 posts and 476 potential activity, if you don't know what this means then read the stickied threads here... To make things simple for you he could spam another 150 posts and get another 150 activity on 1 day (before the ban he won +85 activities in 3 hours)
If they have a signature campaign, it'll be a different situation.
NO! it will simply be worse! If they do and they're posting more than 30-60 posts a day, this should constitute into a ban.
NO! if your posts are constructive you will not be banned for posting 60 posts. -snip-
Hey Worhiper, the lock button please. The scripting of the website should be smarter then. As far as I am concerned, it is more than possible to simply code the website in a way where you cannot post a certain amount of times per day, or you cannot gain a certain amount of activity in a week. The automatic posting delay for new accounts is in full effect, which indicates that the possibility of placing that proposal into effect as well is more than possible.
I don't understand. If you don't like a user, it is best to just place them on ignore instead of antagonizing them. The only time you should post about a user is when they're doing an act or posting comments that are questionable. To me, this is not an issue. They haven't done anything too terrible. I don't recall of there being a rule that you are not allowed to post a certain amount of times per day. If there is a rule, please show me it.
You all just want to antagonize this user, and I will not condone this behavior. Other than posting that red text repeatedly, they're doing nothing wrong.
For some reason, this user has been fed overall incorrect information. Here, I have given him the proper information.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-definitive-explanation-of-how-activity-works-495948
Just a quick PSA to anyone that is annoyed by somebody's posts: it is best to just place them on ignore instead of antagonizing them. I did that with Quickseller, Vod, Gleb Gamow, jacee, dogie, Hariom, and some other people/trolls. If there's no proof that they're doing anything too terrible and you talk negatively about them, then you dislike them on a personal level. Which means it is best to just ignore them.
Jump to: