Pages:
Author

Topic: Should there be a limit to how many times you can post a day? - page 3. (Read 2789 times)

legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Please. Stop spamming the forum. I've seen your name enough times authoring so many shitposts to last me a lifetime.

There really shouldn't, because done people actually contribute to the forum, instead of spam it. I just guess we'll have to live with spammers.

Koff koff
I guess spam means "posting a lot" to you. With that being said, maybe a post restriction is your best bet.


Either way, I am placing you on ignore for the rudeness.

Well generally when you talk about spam here means someone who posts a lot of non constructive posts. What tarsua said it's a pretty valid point too. Site owners will often post a lot in the same thread to communicate with their users.

If I do recall correctly, the meaning of constructive from the English language is doing actions that can help people. In this case I am creating a way to possibly stop people who post a lot. In the OP, I quoted somebody that didn't appreciate somebody posting a lot. So, I came up with the idea of a post restriction.


I would say that is me being constructive. Unfortunately, your idea of constructive and my idea of it would be different. That doesn't mean that I deserve to be insulted. Insulting people would be trolling them, which I do not condone. If you don't appreciate my posts, it doesn't make sense to continue reading them, which means they only click on them to upset me. With that being said, I have placed those people on ignore.

The board is not your parent.  Should it stop after X post... no as some are very active and do have useful posts.   It has things to prevent just pure spam such as posting limits with time in between.  This is something good as chances are after a few you are reported and deleted.

Do I wish the board would stop you from posting in huge bold font?  Yes I do... but they leave it open in case there is a good use of it.  FYI your using to big of font, and bold on post's that don't need it.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
Please. Stop spamming the forum. I've seen your name enough times authoring so many shitposts to last me a lifetime.

There really shouldn't, because done people actually contribute to the forum, instead of spam it. I just guess we'll have to live with spammers.

Koff koff
I guess spam means "posting a lot" to you. With that being said, maybe a post restriction is your best bet.


Either way, I am placing you on ignore for the rudeness.

Well generally when you talk about spam here means someone who posts a lot of non constructive posts. What tarsua said it's a pretty valid point too. Site owners will often post a lot in the same thread to communicate with their users.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Please. Stop spamming the forum. I've seen your name enough times authoring so many shitposts to last me a lifetime.

There really shouldn't, because done people actually contribute to the forum, instead of spam it. I just guess we'll have to live with spammers.

Koff koff
I guess spam means "posting a lot" to you. With that being said, maybe a post restriction is your best bet.


Either way, I am placing you on ignore for the rudeness.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
no, your idea is stupid, what about small website owners who use bitcointalk as a communication hub?
Should they wait untill the day finishes to reply to queries if they have posted the limit already?
Technically it is my idea, but I am not condoning it.

Also, you didn't have to use the term "stupid". English is not my first language, but I do believe that is a rude word to use.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
no, your idea is stupid, what about small website owners who use bitcointalk as a communication hub?
Should they wait untill the day finishes to reply to queries if they have posted the limit already?
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1030
give me your cryptos
Please. Stop spamming the forum. I've seen your name enough times authoring so many shitposts to last me a lifetime.

There really shouldn't, because done people actually contribute to the forum, instead of spam it. I just guess we'll have to live with spammers.

Koff koff
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
I believe no one want this post restriction to be implemented.
Why you want the off-topic section to be deleted. Why?

Quote
I wanted to ask if any of you think the off topic forum should be deleted. Lauda said he doesn't appreciate people that post too much in the off topic forum, where a majority of their post statistics confirm they mostly post in the off-topic forum. Lauda said this is a site that is focused on Bitcoin. For the record, I personally do not recommend this, only because we need diversity here, and having the off-topic section will entice more people to join BitcoinTalk. Those diverse members will eventually learn about Bitcoin.


What do you think? Vote now.


Go to the thread to see that quote.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
I don't bite.
I don't believe in having a post restriction. I am just posting this because some other members sort of implied they wanted that, so I wanted to have everyone see what they honestly believe when it comes to that proposal.


I want to post as much as I please, without feeling victimized for it. As long as what I post is related to the topic I post in, it should never be such a big deal. And as long as it is clear that I'm attempting to be constructive, again, it should be no big deal.


The off topic section should be deleted though. That's for sure. This way, we can keep the site boring, stuck up and professional
I believe no one want this post restriction to be implemented.
Why you want the off-topic section to be deleted. Why?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
This would not be good for a forum in my opinion. Aren't we a decentralized, free movement and then you put a post limitations to the main forum of this free and decentralized movement.

Plain dumb if you ask me!
I do not condone this though.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
Move On !!!!!!
This would not be good for a forum in my opinion. Aren't we a decentralized, free movement and then you put a post limitations to the main forum of this free and decentralized movement.

Plain dumb if you ask me!
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
stupidest decision ever, it's just like limiting how much sex can you have while you are doing it

I believe it's a negative decision as well, but I'd never actually recommend it. I'm just making the proposal to see what other people will say about it.

I'm happy that everyone is saying no.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
stupidest decision ever, it's just like limiting how much sex can you have while you are doing it
I had to agree with this. Kiss
OP, is there a reason why you want this to be implemented, other than to reduce the amount of spam?
I never said that. Read my third post in this thread. I'll make it bold if you want.

That is your third post in this thread.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
stupidest decision ever, it's just like limiting how much sex can you have while you are doing it
I had to agree with this. Kiss
OP, is there a reason why you want this to be implemented, other than to reduce the amount of spam?
I never said that. Read my third post in this thread. I'll make it bold if you want.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
I don't bite.
stupidest decision ever, it's just like limiting how much sex can you have while you are doing it
I had to agree with this. Kiss
OP, is there a reason why you want this to be implemented, other than to reduce the amount of spam?
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
stupidest decision ever, it's just like limiting how much sex can you have while you are doing it
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
I don't bite.
A forum that has the rule where you are limited to only post {insert number here} posts per day is just ridiculous.
Because you cannot control how much post a user want to post in a day. The forum will "dead". By dead, I mean many user will start to migrate to other forum.
Because I've joined some forum with post limitation in the past, and all of them(the forum) are now nowhere to be seen.

Isn't this limitation will destroy the purpose of a forum?
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
Definitely not, it will be a stupid limitation (in a normal forum an user can post how much post he wants).
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
And what would that do? Spammers will still spam and it's not like they post 50 posts a day so the restriction would be meaningless. Spammers are already getting banned anyways so why would we enforce a limit? I haven't seen anyone posting more than 30 posts a day anyways so what would the limit be then, 15-20?
full member
Activity: 363
Merit: 101
Well, such limits arent needed.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
[ b]And when I say that, this is a proposal where the site has automatic scripting where the website just simply refuses to let you post a certain amount of times per day. [/b]
-snip-

Its already in palce. I can at most make one post per 4 seconds or 21,600 posts per day. A newbie account would need to wait 360 seconds between posts so a max of 240 posts per day.
Pages:
Jump to: