Should we limit members in one campaign?

Beparanf

hero member

Activity: 2954

Merit: 796

Quote from: el_lobo on October 26, 2018, 07:32:44 PM

A limit of the participants would certainly not be bad to ensure that you get a minimum wage for the work done.
But something would certainly lead to more trouble and therefore something is probably implemented in almost no bounty.

If there is a limit, the more chance that we can really earn, some bounties tend to give a very little amount since there are many participants, but most of the campaign who limits have a bigger task to do or posting unlike those who are unlimited.

el_lobo

copper member

Activity: 266

Merit: 0

A limit of the participants would certainly not be bad to ensure that you get a minimum wage for the work done.
But something would certainly lead to more trouble and therefore something is probably implemented in almost no bounty.

Gastotade

sr. member

Activity: 545

Merit: 250

Colletrix - Bridging the Physical and Virtual Worl

Quote from: nadyn on October 26, 2018, 05:53:29 AM

The more participants of generosity are attracted to advertising social networks, for the company this is, of course, the best way, and they have no reason to limit, but all this affects the payment of the hunter, who receives 3-5 dollars for 2-3 months of work.

Since there are tons of participants now. There should be limit atleaat in social media like Facebook and Twitter since there are to many who registeres.

Leonard2016

hero member

Activity: 1036

Merit: 520

I think it's a must!
There are a lot of staky campaigns , and you don't know how many tokens you are going to get finally when it is like that!
I'd rather to know how many tokens im going to get at the end so would pick those ones which have specified the number of each bounty token at the beginning .

nadyn

sr. member

Activity: 714

Merit: 287

The more participants of generosity are attracted to advertising social networks, for the company this is, of course, the best way, and they have no reason to limit, but all this affects the payment of the hunter, who receives 3-5 dollars for 2-3 months of work.

DEVIDIRUS

member

Activity: 152

Merit: 18

recently as I know bounty got kind of popular and lots of people want to participate there and limiting number of members seems as good enough idea for saving acceptable level of reward

MrPao

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 10

Fast, Smart, Trustworthy

Even if you limit the members who participate in the ad, can you guarantee that other members of the ad will not create spam? If not, then such restrictions will have no meaning!

jakezyrus

full member

Activity: 714

Merit: 100

no we shouldnt and that is a bad idea imo , there are too many users on this forum and every one is verry eager to join a campaign . we should give them a chance to join a campaign so that they can also earn . dont be so selfish guys .

many campaign managers nowadays do have this mentality , they are only limiting the spot for thier campaigns . the worst and horrible part is they also limit the campaign to high ranked members only . lastly , they also add stricker rules such as merrit reuirements , good quality post , etc ..

Mardoker135

member

Activity: 213

Merit: 10

recently as I know bounty got kind of popular and lots of people want to participate there and limiting number of members seems as good enough idea for saving acceptable level of reward

Anhduc2015

newbie

Activity: 84

Merit: 0

I also think like you. Limited number of participants will make the project more quality. Also, avoid the number of bots joining the project

bitcoinveda

member

Activity: 378

Merit: 10

I think there is no possibility of limiting the members because many ICO companies are giving bounties their ICO should get more awareness about the projects. That's why even bounty managers will not restrict them either in social media and Signature campaign promotions.

cryptobull3

member

Activity: 336

Merit: 10

Yeah I think there must be limitation in participants, so that it would be worthwhile to join and stay till end, I hate these staky campaigns, where they give you unknown stakes till end of the bounty, in one if these campaigns I only got 10 tokens after 1 month of participating in there, they said its small because the huge amount of participants!
After that I just decided to join In campaigns that they have specified tokens from beginning.

imsotiredofmoviereboots

full member

Activity: 476

Merit: 100

More and more people are discovering about this opportunity so I think it is about time to implement it. I also just want to salute the admin for making new rules that discourage a lot of farmers and spammers in this forum. It helped a lot to lessen the users a bit because it's very hard to rank up which you need to get higher rewards.

ikarasev10

jr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 1

The Premier Digital Asset Management Ecosystem

Quote from: aigor9994 on July 18, 2018, 10:01:49 AM

I think yes, otherwise the payments will be quite tiny, right rulle- first come-first serve!

im think yes too, because the number of participants is growing time after time. and with such success in a few months, even subscription companies for months of work will bring mere pennies

Typogre12

newbie

Activity: 95

Merit: 0

I agree with you that bouty campaign need limits, otherwise bounty hunters will get a pittance. To promote the project, creators need to use other sources of advertising. For example upvotes on Reddit they can buy on upvotes.io

Hue Moon

newbie

Activity: 154

Merit: 0

Limiting the number of participants is also a good idea. I should limit the number of new members too.

panpine

full member

Activity: 277

Merit: 101

in my opinion, we will limit the campaign accordingly. As a social media bonus campaign, we can not limit it because with the larger community, the more popular the ICO will be and the more successful it will be.

bitcoin.beda

member

Activity: 770

Merit: 11

quarkchain.io

It has advantages and disadvantages if we limit the members per campaign as other troll accounts may register and fill up all the slot and the genuine bounty hunters cannot participate thus all of the rewards can be rewarded by few people.

The main advantage of it is that the genuine bounty hunters will have decent bounty rewards on their work.

These should be considered in case the campaign will be limited.

A.SanchezNo7

newbie

Activity: 252

Merit: 0

Quote from: South Park on May 09, 2018, 03:40:00 PM

Quote from: A.SanchezNo7 on April 07, 2018, 05:04:14 AM

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

There should definitely be a limit to the participants in a campaign, however it is very unlikely that the developers of that ico will want that, it is just common sense, the developers want as many promoters as they can get for their coin and if they limited the number of the participants that will limit the exposure of the project and that is something they do not want.

Dear friend,
I agree with you.
As my thinking, It is hard to limit the number of participants when the developers, project managers want to do reverse things because of advertisement purpose. I think we must accept that thing. I just hope they apply limit in part.

Xuaquing141

newbie

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

The bountier like this ideal but the bounty manager or the owner if ICO project dont like this. . The want to attractive more and more investor who invest in their project and dont care about the rewards for participant.

Topic: Should we limit members in one campaign? (Read 1563 times)