Topic: Should we Re-Brand Bitcoin? (Read 3455 times)
why would anybody want to re-brand BTC! also, this is not possible.
Rebranding is not the appropriate solution to attract more investors and creates new dynasty in crypto market place. Once bitcoin be rebranded there will have major adjustment and changes that could affect the decentralized and programs. The old process will be change and the popularity will be shaken. There are more possibility that could happen once rebranding will happen.
In my opinion i dont think will be re brand or needs to be changedin bitcoin itself. Because i believe bitcoin will be rise again and checkout again the whitepaper.
Bitcoin itself is known to be as its own brand. I am not in favor of re branding bitcoin because bitcoin already have established his name.
In my opinion i dont think will be re brand or needs to be changedin bitcoin itself. Because i believe bitcoin will be rise again and checkout again the whitepaper.
We should not re-brand bitcoin, because it is already serving for a decade now and its name is already known and familiar all over the world especially to places that are using digital currency, bitcoin had establish its name as a bitcoin so it should not be change to other hind of name.
Bitcoin is good and famous, there must be improvements to be accepted by all countries.The weakness of bitcoin is not how bitcoin works, but because of negative information circulating in the media.
Bitcoin is the future currency, it must be promoted positively so that more users.
I do not think that something needs to be changed in bitcoin itself. It is necessary to change the attitude of people to it, to educate students at universities, ordinary people, it is necessary to increase their knowledge about bitcoin. The more people will understand it, the less skepticism will be around cryptocurrency.
Though I don't think they will all be interested about it.
We all know that people have their own point of view to these kind of things and we should respect what it is though the problem is that they have their own point of view not knowing what really is Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. I do know some people that are saying things they don't know about it and other people are believing it since they don't know what really is. They are spreading information to other people and it is really frustrating..
I do not think that something needs to be changed in bitcoin itself. It is necessary to change the attitude of people to it, to educate students at universities, ordinary people, it is necessary to increase their knowledge about bitcoin. The more people will understand it, the less skepticism will be around cryptocurrency.
Of course we don't have to do that. Bitcoin should remain a bitcoin and continue to develop on its line. I don't think there's anything about his technology or his image that needs to be changed.
I think Bitcoin's strength lies in the fact that he remains in his almost unchanged form from the very beginning. We should make sure that it remains traditionally unchanged than thinking about rebranding
bitcoin is unique in its own way and it has no mistakes neither does it have corrections to be effected nad as such does not need to be re-branded for any particular reason as it is working within the framework needed by the team of programmers that did factor it.
I do not see anything wrong with the modern image of bitcoin. He is developing well, even despite the huge amount of skepticism around him, but the technology itself is not to blame. This is just the opinion of people and their misunderstanding of bitcoin generates such a negative.
I think that it is too late to rebrand bitcoin because it has been developing for 10 years. Moreover, it is already good enough, just not all people understand the technology and because of that, born such a huge number of skeptical opinions about it.
We should not re-brand bitcoin, because it is already serving for a decade now and its name is already known and familiar all over the world especially to places that are using digital currency, bitcoin had establish its name as a bitcoin so it should not be change to other hind of name.
Branding does not imply a name change. Branding is just a change of style, mostly external. I do not know how branding can be attributed to bitcoin because it is a digital asset and it does not have such a style. Maybe that's his main problem. I would try to draw something interesting, but only if someone paid me.
Yes, in the world of crypto currencies, some teams use rebranding. For example: Dash used to be called Darkcoin, Neo used to be called Antshares, Nano formerly known as RaiBlocks. Behind the rebranding is not only the change of name, but also some internal changes.
But, as I wrote above, Bitcoin doesn't need rebranding. In my opinion.
It is not necessary to re-brand bitcoin, because even if its name will be change but still it is a bitcoin, so the name bitcoin will be still the name ,because its been for many years ,and bitcoin is looking good ,it is only now that the market is in falldown and all coins are affected ,and if we change the brand name it will not make the market rise immediately.
Do you think Bitcoin needs some Rebranding?
Rebranding is the creation of a new look and feel for an established product or company. The usual goal of rebranding is to influence a customer's perception about a product or service or the company overall by revitalizing the brand and making it seem more modern and relevant to the customer's needs.
First off, the name is a bit confusing? - Most people see the name and associate it with some physical coin. The media is also not helping with this
perception, because with every article about Bitcoin, pictures are shown of physical Casascius bitcoins.
The other aspect of Bitcoin that can be rebranded is it's bad reputation that has been built up and shilled up ..over years.
Every company gets to a point where they need to re-think their original goals and future plans... Why not Bitcoin? We have come a long way
since 2009 and making small changes will help us to take this into a new future, without the baggage of the past.
What would the pro's and cons of this be, and also the impact?
Let's discuss
I believe that this is not a good idea . Why we need to rebrand bitcoin ? There is nothing wrong about the name , we should not rebrand but rather expose . Rebranding is the creation of a new look and feel for an established product or company. The usual goal of rebranding is to influence a customer's perception about a product or service or the company overall by revitalizing the brand and making it seem more modern and relevant to the customer's needs.
First off, the name is a bit confusing? - Most people see the name and associate it with some physical coin. The media is also not helping with this
perception, because with every article about Bitcoin, pictures are shown of physical Casascius bitcoins.
The other aspect of Bitcoin that can be rebranded is it's bad reputation that has been built up and shilled up ..over years.
Every company gets to a point where they need to re-think their original goals and future plans... Why not Bitcoin? We have come a long way
since 2009 and making small changes will help us to take this into a new future, without the baggage of the past.
What would the pro's and cons of this be, and also the impact?
Let's discuss
What does OP mean by rebranding? Is it changing its name? the way it is used? I don't understand.
If that's what he meant then there goes alt coins. Every single day there is a new coin that is launched for a specific usage based on customers and none of them ever get over bitcoin for a long time. Why re-brand again?
If that's what he meant then there goes alt coins. Every single day there is a new coin that is launched for a specific usage based on customers and none of them ever get over bitcoin for a long time. Why re-brand again?
Bitcoin does not need rebranding. All bitcoin needs is people who be able to adapt to the change in the way goods and services are transacted within the Blockchain ecosystem. People need to understand the advancement Bitcoin present to our financial ecosystem and adapt to this change.
FOr what sort of genuine reason will cause a rebranding of bitcoin. Very serious or is it about music where we can easily rebrand or what. ANd as far as i know even in this current form of bitcoin there is no alts coin that has made better name as bitcoin which will cause a rebrand of name. Am sure this recent dips has cause all these and i believe when they tables turn for bitcoin these same people seeking for rebranding will all hail for bitcoin.
We should not re-brand bitcoin, because it is already serving for a decade now and its name is already known and familiar all over the world especially to places that are using digital currency, bitcoin had establish its name as a bitcoin so it should not be change to other hind of name.
Branding does not imply a name change. Branding is just a change of style, mostly external. I do not know how branding can be attributed to bitcoin because it is a digital asset and it does not have such a style. Maybe that's his main problem. I would try to draw something interesting, but only if someone paid me.
I think bitcoin is not necessary as you say. because so far bitcoin has been established, there are still many who do not believe it, if bitcoin is changed as you think, of course it will start over. because bitcoin travel is also certainly not yet at its peak.
Jump to: