Topic: Sick of Martingale? Give this a shot... It works. Chart and Instructions. - page 5. (Read 7568 times)

I've tried this a couple of times now and it doesn't do too bad, again it's all about the luck

Looks like martingale.. maybe it will work from someone but i think it always depends in our luck..
i will try this in faucet bonus maybe it will work.. just try..

I made a script based on this idea. U can check it out here https://bot.seuntjie.com/Scripts.aspx

Interesting. But it hav`nt much sense, cause only stupid gyus plays in casino.

  Nice Strategy, but house edge will catch you out at some point

Ermm so tried this with a script based on the method..and so far its not profitable..Care to show us a video of you profiting using this method?

That isnt how provably fair works

I played a while with a starting bet of 0.00025000.

Made 0.6000000 in under an hour.

damn thanks to this i will try it let's see how it works
it looks better than martingale tho

Its just a simple bot I created using WinAutomation. Unless you have the program, you can't read the source... it's their own propriatary "waj" format. The only other option I can output is an EXE, which is what I use. It runs as a sidecar to chrome or firefox.

You can see if you can download a free trial, I could then post the source waj project file for you. (That way you can read it for your safety - as while my EXE is totally non-malicious I would never recommend using an EXE file from someone on a site like that where it could steal coins.

But long short of it is, you set your base, it rolls, and follows the rules. Add base to each bet until win, double 3 times, reset. Rather simple.

Its slow though, but I dont code js or c+ so my coding ability is limited in that sense.

Ive been playing 1000 usually. Sometimes 2000, sometimes 500 (satoshis)

This is the chart I created which shows the possible progression for the betting pattern.

If you look at the max loss vs payout, it can be a good way to play, and is also customizable, you could do 4x streaks, or even 5x. Depending on your bankroll.

3 seems to be the best overall for me, it has the least amount of up and down swings in balance.

I have run this with my bot starting at 100k satoshi a number of times, and a half day later the balance is 400k to 600k.

Here is the link to the chart:

martingale strategy for dice is not good
you can't always profit for this strategy for the long time.

Yea of course duration of play in terms of rounds does come in to play, so you went down on 2.2; but you (and of course you know) could have come back up; as luck does fall into the equation.

Another variant you can try; is to play for 4 consecutive wins, or 5 consecutive wins.

At 2x payout (49.50% chance of win); your maximum loss per roll is limited to whatever you set your base bet at provided you play through to a win of X (number of consecutive wins) you decide on in the begining.

So if you say decide on a base of 10000 satoshi you could see a bet sequence to win as follows:

FOR A LOSING SEQUENCE AIMING FOR 4 WINS:

0.00010000 LOSE
0.00020000 LOSE
0.00030000 LOSE
0.00040000 LOSE
0.00050000 WIN     (AT WHICH POINT YOU HAVE ROLLED 5 ROLLS / NET P/L IS NOW -0.00050000   (0.00010000 PER ROLL)
0.00100000 WIN
0.00200000 WIN
0.00400000 LOSE   (EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE LOST; YOU HAVE STILL ONLY RISKED AND LOST 0.00050000 YET PLAYED 9 ROLLS = LOSS OF LESS THAN 0.00006000 PER ROLL

NOW FOR A WINNING SEQUENCE:

0.00010000 LOSE
0.00020000 LOSE
0.00030000 WIN    (AT WHICH POINT YOU HAVE ROLLED 3 ROLLS / NET P/L IS NOW 0.00000000   (0.00000000 PER ROLL)
0.00060000 WIN
0.00120000 WIN
0.00240000 WIN   NET WIN:    +0.00420000

REGARDLESS; It doesnt matter how many losses you have before you hit your win streak; your maximum loss per roll is limited by this strategy to your base bet x # of rolls.

Martingale is too risky, a long loss streak wipes you out. But with this strategy, as long as you calculate a safe number of being able to hit some bad losing streaks in a row; as in losing 8x then 10x then 5x then 7x before hitting an actual win/reset- the payout is much higher.

For Martingale, to net 0.00420000 in profit, you have to win 42 martingale series runs; without doubling up every roll and busting out.

This works much better.

I built a bot that does the betting and calculating and resetting all on it's own. It works great and havent lost thus far (knock on wood).

Didn't the OP just said spare the "the house always have an edge" thing? Jeez.

Anyways, I tried this method. It honestly doesn't pay off at 45% (x2.2) imo. It brought me down to -23% of my bankroll just from the mere fact that it's harder to reach a 3 consecutive win streak. I had better payouts with martingale with x2.2. However, when I tried 49.5% (x2) it brought me back to +2 of my original bankroll. Of course it took a very long time but was worth it. Could've potentially have been at +25% if I went x2.

Just wanted to tell that it works! Well, to an extent, at least.

Indeed. It does not matter what 'strategy' you come up with, long term the house edge will always catch you.

I think..strategies always loose at the long term..well technically its really like that due to house edge.

Interesting results on 3x payout with same betting pattern.

The bets meerly tread water and hold at the same amount... just waiting for a triple win. Just takes longer to hit 3 wins at 3x but losing streaks are nill.

I could have swore they said the rolls were truly random and provably fair

Yea basically you're simply shooting for any 3x streak of wins. Thats it. Roughly 12.5% odds. But a payout of 20x what martingale pays.

So 12.5% win chance with 15-30x payout on win.

or Martingale and get

50% chance on win and 1x payout.

This does work.  Of course yes, either 1 you hit a simply bad loss streak never gaining on 3 wins in a row over 1000s of bets, or the house simply says- yea I dont like this well give you the rolls we like.

But yea, so what the sites manipulate rolls is that what you are saying?