☛ Signature Bounty & Merit System - page 4.

uralcryptocoin

sr. member

Activity: 1042

Merit: 328

SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin

Quote from: Bttzed03 on February 13, 2019, 08:43:07 AM

Monitoring messages with merits is an additional work to the bounty team and most of them do not want that. Besides, the goal the project thru signature campaign and having merit/s does not add to the visibility of the post.

So far, I've only seen one campaign rewards post/comment with merit/s.

Could you post a link to the campaign?
It's very interesting to know some experience in that field.

Quote from: Bttzed03 on February 13, 2019, 08:43:07 AM

Besides, the goal the project thru signature campaign and having merit/s does not add to the visibility of the post.

Here I can't agree with you. The message with merit point captures enough attention. It'd like to read this message

Bttzed03

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1150

https://bitcoincleanup.com/

Monitoring messages with merits is an additional work to the bounty team and most of them do not want that. Besides, the goal the project thru signature campaign and having merit/s does not add to the visibility of the post.

So far, I've only seen one campaign rewards post/comment with merit/s.

uralcryptocoin

sr. member

Activity: 1042

Merit: 328

SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin

Quote from: Denton on February 13, 2019, 05:44:48 AM

The idea is interesting. This would encourage people to write quality posts and possibly further reduce the amount of spam in this forum. But on the other hand, capitalize merit quite difficult and it can result in a new wave of sales merit and will give the opportunity to influential accounts to capitalize on this. Merit as gratitude for useful information will almost never be applied.

To partly avoid the situation bounty reward could be paid not for the count of merit points but for how many different users merited the message.
For example
1 user merited the message - 1 stake
2 users merited the message - 3 stakes
3 users merited the message - 8 stakes
5 users merited the message - 25 stakes
So it's not matter how many merit points you get from a single users

Volk-05

jr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 1

Such a system should clearly motivate to write better posts that could be appreciated!

Denton

full member

Activity: 798

Merit: 100

The idea is interesting. This would encourage people to write quality posts and possibly further reduce the amount of spam in this forum. But on the other hand, capitalize merit quite difficult and it can result in a new wave of sales merit and will give the opportunity to influential accounts to capitalize on this. Merit as gratitude for useful information will almost never be applied.

bitcoinst

hero member

Activity: 1708

Merit: 651

SmartFi - EARN, LEND & TRADE

That's right, but also it is possible to introduce a system in which the more a participant has earned Merit, the greater the increase in their share, in %, will be received.
I think this motivation is quite capable of attracting quality participants to the company.

ivaf

full member

Activity: 980

Merit: 109

Well, why not use it? There are managers who evaluate the merits received. So, for the presence of a certain number of merits increases the number of stakes.

Milamol

member

Activity: 686

Merit: 11

Quote from: sehoon on February 11, 2019, 09:13:29 PM

I don't think this kind of system really works. Because we all have different standards for quality. And I've seen some posts that are really helpful and does not get any merits. I also think that there are group of friends here in this forum that exchange each one of merits. They only make their post long enough to make it look like that it is really good but when you read it, it doesn't contain anything interesting.

Totally agree with you. Such a system of mutual remeritation Grin

has a large proportion of subjectivity. For example,
some user does not know how to express good thoughts;
someone might like the style of the presentation of an almost useless post.

But, in general, it is a good idea, but a non-working idea.

AzamNurWahid

member

Activity: 658

Merit: 20

if manager bounty handles 1 or 2 bounties in my opinion it still applies the idea that you gave but if the bounty manager handles up to 5/8 bounties in my opinion they won't have much time to check each quality post, what's more if the signature participants of each bounty have from 100 participants

wall101

member

Activity: 560

Merit: 10

It is a good strategy to improve up those people who want to earn big stakes every campaign for bounty. But lot of them not even notify this and maybe some bounty managers will approve this process someday.

uralcryptocoin

sr. member

Activity: 1042

Merit: 328

SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin

Quote from: Sebas.tian on February 12, 2019, 10:46:17 AM

This might get abused. A lot of bounty hunters control high ranking alts. This means that for a legendary rank, it would be able to utilize its s-merits to increase their other account's merit and increase its reward

It could happened. But if the reward in Bounty campaign will be less or equal merit's price at black market then the doings will be meaningless.
Now somebody can buy merits to increase the rank and get more rewarded in Bounties. But it's illegal and there is risk of account ban.
But when you create quality content evrybody wins

Dacosta Osei-Tutu

member

Activity: 560

Merit: 10

I think the main motive for the implementation of signature campaign is to advertise the project and not to reduce spam on the forum so when a post receives merit, it is to the benefit of the account holder to increase in rank and that's all.

Sebas.tian

full member

Activity: 2184

Merit: 184

Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com

This might get abused. A lot of bounty hunters control high ranking alts. This means that for a legendary rank, it would be able to utilize its s-merits to increase their other account's merit and increase its reward

Prompyboo

sr. member

Activity: 807

Merit: 251

World's First Crowd Owned Cryptocurrency Exchange

Quote from: SwiggHeart on February 12, 2019, 05:26:14 AM

I bet it wouldn't change at all since that was the bounty campaign rights to set up a new rule like you said. You say this because you want to earn merit right?

everyone wants to earn) I think no one has any other reasons. I doubt that there are really a lot of people who work for the mass adoption

coin-investor

hero member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 598

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: uralcryptocoin on February 11, 2019, 01:41:49 PM

More than a year ago Merit System was integrated to Bitcointalk forum to make forum messages more informative and quality (or should make it)
That is the question\idea: Why Bounty campaign starters/managers don't use that?
For example it would be an additional bonus for Signature Bounty participants if their message will be merited. It will confirm (in ideal) that the message will be detaily read and estimated and signature will be noticed for sure.

Well that's good but getting merit is quite harder, campaigner might resort to cheating if they know that they will be getting more but it's a good compensation so participants will make good post and create a good thread that will interest the community, it's an added incentives.

uralcryptocoin

sr. member

Activity: 1042

Merit: 328

SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin

Here are too many messages about the complexity of checking merited messages. But it can easely automate. At first the posts link of participant is checked and the second is checking of merit page of participant.
It's about 15-20 strings of code of parcing page source code by using regular expressions.
In fact there is no serious technical difficulties to realize the system
Bounty campaigns use tens of thousand dollars. So it's a good deal to spend few hundred dollars to realize the code that can potentially improve and promote the campaign.

SwiggHeart

jr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 1

I bet it wouldn't change at all since that was the bounty campaign rights to set up a new rule like you said. You say this because you want to earn merit right?

10BTCaDay

full member

Activity: 770

Merit: 100

Oikos.cash | Decentralized Finance on Tron

Quote from: hrunya102 on February 12, 2019, 04:55:58 AM

Interesting idea to give a small bonus for merit, but to deserve merit is very difficult, even for a good and original article you can not get anything.

Because no one writes the original posts and does not give anything useful to the users of this forum. So they can't earn merit

btc_angela

hero member

Activity: 2660

Merit: 551

Quote from: uralcryptocoin on February 11, 2019, 01:41:49 PM

More than a year ago Merit System was integrated to Bitcointalk forum to make forum messages more informative and quality (or should make it)
That is the question\idea: Why Bounty campaign starters/managers don't use that?
For example it would be an additional bonus for Signature Bounty participants if their message will be merited. It will confirm (in ideal) that the message will be detaily read and estimated and signature will be noticed for sure.

The merit system is more prevalent in bitcoin paying signatures only and not on bounty. Why not bounty? it maybe harsh to hear but some bounty managers are too lazy, heck they will even accept red trust members to participate in their campaigns. Maybe it's hard to check because most bounty accepts 100 participants in one project alone. However, if this is implement there will be less spammers in this community.

hrunya102

member

Activity: 546

Merit: 11

Interesting idea to give a small bonus for merit, but to deserve merit is very difficult, even for a good and original article you can not get anything.

Topic: ☛ Signature Bounty & Merit System - page 4. (Read 18801 times)