Topic: ☛ Signature Bounty & Merit System - page 6. (Read 18817 times)
This idea is definitely not workable because very very minor percent of posts get merit so even if they add any bonus for merit point posts there will be hardly any getters.
I think its a lot of work to track the merit-status of the postings. Bounty hunters usually write hundrets of posts during an ICO, the manager would need an automatic system to analyze and count those posts. But its definitly a very good idea and worth a look at!
More than a year ago Merit System was integrated to Bitcointalk forum to make forum messages more informative and quality (or should make it)
That is the question\idea: Why Bounty campaign starters/managers don't use that?
For example it would be an additional bonus for Signature Bounty participants if their message will be merited. It will confirm (in ideal) that the message will be detaily read and estimated and signature will be noticed for sure.
That is the question\idea: Why Bounty campaign starters/managers don't use that?
For example it would be an additional bonus for Signature Bounty participants if their message will be merited. It will confirm (in ideal) that the message will be detaily read and estimated and signature will be noticed for sure.
Previously yahoo62278 used this system to motivate bounty hunters - you have merit therefore get a bonus. But soon there will be a year as he does not use this concept in his bounty campaigns. Here is an example, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/yocoin-sig-campaignclosed-3152979
Some bounty managers do carry out similar system. For example, some friends participated in an eth bounty campaign, the aspect of the signature was that: when your post receives signature during the week under review, you will be randomly selected for eth giveaway which is separate from the native token earned. It wasn't limited to signature alone.
Looks interesting. It potentially can increase both Signature bounty quality and message content quality too
More than a year ago Merit System was integrated to Bitcointalk forum to make forum messages more informative and quality (or should make it)
That is the question\idea: Why Bounty campaign starters/managers don't use that?
For example it would be an additional bonus for Signature Bounty participants if their message will be merited. It will confirm (in ideal) that the message will be detaily read and estimated and signature will be noticed for sure.
That is the question\idea: Why Bounty campaign starters/managers don't use that?
For example it would be an additional bonus for Signature Bounty participants if their message will be merited. It will confirm (in ideal) that the message will be detaily read and estimated and signature will be noticed for sure.
Jump to: