I think I have to retire my accusations here as I played a couple of days ago the Green Knight slot from Play n Go and it gave the bonus round a lot,truly a lot of times,I even managed to hit that x100 multiplier several times and won about 200 dollars with the lowest bet of 0.10,I won several times over x200 of my bet during the x100 multiplier and I was surprised to see how things changed so fast after me writing my experiences not only here but also in some other places,I guess it has nothing to do with corruption but only with luck
.
Even if you did not get better result after you wrote your accusation, you should never accuse something without any valid proof as it is called by baseless accusation. I would even say that you had funny accusation because you accuse Play n Go as corrupted because some others people win while some others lose while playing Play n Go, isn't it something very normal in gambling?
It sounds like that you were just so jealous because some other players won but you lose, and your jealousy lead you into more negative thinking for the provider.
LMAO, that's why no casino has good reviews on reviews platforms, it is mostly filled with butthurt players
When everything is good (translated as a win), the game is fair, and the casino is legit...
When everything is bad, people then scream "scam, scam!"
In-case of "Sweet-bonanza" there is no single proof, someone can reach the max-win. Probaly from my perspective can't be design to get the max win, we all know most of pragmatic play game 90% have rigged code (Like, easy pattern if we get max win or no).
IMO it's also a gambling fallacy when you see a 500x multiplier drop on Olympus/Starlight and think that "This is it!" "It's happening!" etc., when in reality I often got shitty results from this kind of tumble. The code isn't "rigged" in the sense that this max-win event is predictable, even at the free spin with multiple 500x+ multipliers. Ideally, the highest recorded multiplier came from the simulation, so if they say 20,000x is the max win, then it is... (if you trust the provider). The problem is, the higher the max win, the rarer it become... It can happen one in x years (if people still play the game), so if the game is not popular then we won't see the max win.