Topic: SmallChange [research-only] [Litecoin based] [15 seconds blocks] [*update now*] - page 8. (Read 26622 times)
April 24, 2013, 11:43:03 PM
I'm beginning to wonder if the "research" aspect of this coin is related to 51% attacks and DDoS takeover and things like that...
April 24, 2013, 11:23:07 PM
I can't seem to reliably maintain connections, sometimes I have 9 or more than other times I have 0. Happening on Linux and Windows clients.
April 24, 2013, 09:59:17 PM
I think this coin requires someone who can develop it futher 
Such as new name, make diff adjustment act work better etc
Such as new name, make diff adjustment act work better etc April 24, 2013, 09:33:23 PM
I think my miner was ddosed a bit however I simply restarted it 
April 24, 2013, 08:57:10 PM
http://sc.dontmine.me is back but the poolserver is disabled for now.
Everyone with a payout address has been paid at this point, 10k~ SC sent out.
Everyone with a payout address has been paid at this point, 10k~ SC sent out.
When will the pool be back up so I can withdrawl
April 24, 2013, 08:52:48 PM
it suppose to be up
April 24, 2013, 08:02:00 PM
http://sc.dontmine.me is back but the poolserver is disabled for now.
Everyone with a payout address has been paid at this point, 10k~ SC sent out.
Everyone with a payout address has been paid at this point, 10k~ SC sent out.
When will the pool be back up so I can withdrawl
April 24, 2013, 04:39:23 PM
Balthazar, I installed them.
April 24, 2013, 04:27:23 PM
It seems that you forgot about boost dev packages installation.
April 24, 2013, 04:20:15 PM
You made a coding error:
April 24, 2013, 03:55:28 PM
I'm not sure that there is any sense pooled mining for such ridiculously low targets... Even if network hashrate will be > 1 ghash/s 
I agree, it's kind of silly but that's part of the research to learn
The only reason the pool site is up is for people to claim coins, but most of them are paid out already. I really doubt I'll open the workserver again.
What do you say paul?? seems like people liked your pool and would like you to bring it back on as its the smaller miners that appreciate it the most
April 24, 2013, 03:47:05 PM
I'm not sure that there is any sense pooled mining for such ridiculously low targets... Even if network hashrate will be > 1 ghash/s
I agree, it's kind of silly but that's part of the research to learn
The only reason the pool site is up is for people to claim coins, but most of them are paid out already. I really doubt I'll open the workserver again.
What do you say paul?? seems like people liked your pool and would like you to bring it back on as its the smaller miners that appreciate it the most
April 24, 2013, 03:36:10 PM
I'm not sure that there is any sense pooled mining for such ridiculously low targets... Even if network hashrate will be > 1 ghash/s
I agree, it's kind of silly but that's part of the research to learn
The only reason the pool site is up is for people to claim coins, but most of them are paid out already. I really doubt I'll open the workserver again.
April 24, 2013, 03:23:17 PM
perhaps the pool was not a bad idea as the difficulty skyrockets 
fuzzy@fuzzy-VGN-SZ61MN-B:~/Dev/smallchange/src$ ./smallchange getinfo
{
"version" : 60300,
"protocolversion" : 60001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 11.00000000,
"blocks" : 26073,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.06622092,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1366577136,
"keypoolsize" : 103,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00010000,
"errors" : ""
}
./smallchange getinfo
{
"version" : 60300,
"protocolversion" : 60001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 11.00000000,
"blocks" : 26289,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.15730200,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1366577136,
"keypoolsize" : 103,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00010000,
"errors" : ""
}
fuzzy@fuzzy-VGN-SZ61MN-B:~/Dev/smallchange/src$ ./smallchange getinfo
{
"version" : 60300,
"protocolversion" : 60001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 11.00000000,
"blocks" : 26073,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.06622092,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1366577136,
"keypoolsize" : 103,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00010000,
"errors" : ""
}
./smallchange getinfo
{
"version" : 60300,
"protocolversion" : 60001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 11.00000000,
"blocks" : 26289,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.15730200,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1366577136,
"keypoolsize" : 103,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00010000,
"errors" : ""
}
April 24, 2013, 03:06:29 PM
i installed fine on ubuntu 12.04, had blocks downloading, did command
./smallchange getnewaddress
which this time gave me SD71XKtGQTXs8rH8KgpRueaainTActYpHJ
but no matter what i search i can't get the old addresses back, am i missing a command or using the daemon incorrectly?
many thanks in advance
sorry it now showed up... very strange but ty for the coins friends
April 24, 2013, 03:04:18 PM
http://sc.dontmine.me is back but the poolserver is disabled for now.
Everyone with a payout address has been paid at this point, 10k~ SC sent out.
Thanks Paul21. The hard work is appreciated. I'll have to bug you about the intricacies of setting up a pool for a new altcoin one of these days.Everyone with a payout address has been paid at this point, 10k~ SC sent out.
dynamic difficulty retarget seems a given. what about dynamic rewards? it sounds like a terrible idea... i believe liquidcoin made an attempt at it, but hear me out a sec. dynamic rewards plus dynamic difficulty would allow you to tune for a specific number of coins a day, regardless of network has rate. that seems like a reasonable way to control inflation.
Interesting but isn't this duplication? Isn't the purpose of difficulty to control the speed at which reward coins are distributed? Or are there other advantages too? April 24, 2013, 02:53:07 PM
I'm not sure that there is any sense pooled mining for such ridiculously low targets... Even if network hashrate will be > 1 ghash/s
I agree, it's kind of silly but that's part of the research to learn
The only reason the pool site is up is for people to claim coins, but most of them are paid out already. I really doubt I'll open the workserver again.
April 24, 2013, 02:45:17 PM
I'm not sure that there is any sense pooled mining for such ridiculously low targets... Even if network hashrate will be > 1 ghash/s
April 24, 2013, 02:42:21 PM
http://sc.dontmine.me is back but the poolserver is disabled for now.
Everyone with a payout address has been paid at this point, 10k~ SC sent out.
Everyone with a payout address has been paid at this point, 10k~ SC sent out.
April 24, 2013, 12:52:53 PM
dynamic difficulty retarget seems a given. what about dynamic rewards? it sounds like a terrible idea... i believe liquidcoin made an attempt at it, but hear me out a sec. dynamic rewards plus dynamic difficulty would allow you to tune for a specific number of coins a day, regardless of network has rate. that seems like a reasonable way to control inflation.
Interesting but isn't this duplication? Isn't the purpose of difficulty to control the speed at which reward coins are distributed? Or are there other advantages too? Jump to: