Anon136, your heart is in the right place, and I applaud your attempts to find a new way out of our slavery.
Unfortunately you still have too much faith in nations. They are ruthless, murdering barbarians that won't stand for any part of these answers. The sooner you see them for what they really are, the sooner you'll know that you can't run and you can't hide... They'll find and destroy you anyway.
he makes a big error here. He says "without paying taxes to another nation for protection, then you are doomed" No one suggested not purchasing defense.
I suggest that purchasing defense is a naive concept. If nations won't sell you land because of their old boy's club, what makes you think one will sell you security from all the other countries in their club?
That pretty much makes the country who sells such to you an enemy of the rest of the planet. They don't want to lose their hard-earned relationships with the others, or worse yet, start a war, over little old us... Even if we pay them astronomical fees.
But if we get to purchase it from any sovereign in the world than it will, technically, be being provided to us by a competitive market. We can simply fly a flag of convenience and probably pay out the fucking nose for it, but still it would be worth it.
If you tightly align yourself with one country in this manner though, what you REALLY need is the rest of the world's protection from IT.
Imagine if the Free State Project got really popular... All the libertarians moved there and the state laws all changed to something pretty much opposite of the federal laws? Worse yet, the low-tax, high-entrepreneur environment would make our state extremely rich while the rest of the country was in steep decline.
Do you think Obomba would stand for it?
Do you think the dumbasses in the other 49 states would either?
There is in fact, a precedent for this exact situation in the USA. It happened in 1861... And in more than one state... They got 11 states together, thinking they had safety in numbers.
To my best knowledge, that didn't turn out too well for the states that were trying to make new laws for themselves.
Again, success is your enemy when dealing with nations, because nations always will have more guns.
plus in every other failed attempt that i know of it was not the same thing that i am proposing. a) it was in the past that everyone tried to create new sovereigns.
This really doesn't help your point. If anything, people are more stupid and trained to enjoy socialism today.
b) it was before the internet, now the public can see government crimes and the people on this island would not be foreigners, they would be peoples relatives from all over the world.
Here's the thing though about the internet: Those who aren't suspicious of their government won't be watching for this. They won't be using a non-state-controlled internet, they won't be searching keywords that have anything to do with your movement, and the states damn sure won't be reporting any part of your efforts in the mainstream media.
The internet will be useful when the day comes that we've completely bypassed the ISPs with mesh networking. We're just one WiFi specification away from being able to do that now.
But even when ISPs no longer exist, and the state can't control the media so effectively, there still has to be a person-to-person effort to get people to not trust their government enough to care... That will take a long time and a lot of effort by a hell of a lot of people, period.
No webcam show of a libertarian paradise will ever be popular here, not before each person here is 'converted' directly first and the internet has no more ISPs.
also sorry i keep adding to this. We dont have to step on anyones toes. Its not like we would be a harbor for pirates, digital or otherwise.
This is uber-naive too. Governments will say that you do, and then attack you for that reason regardless of the truth.
Not to mention the 'turrists you're harboring too!
Even if you try your hardest to not let any of this element in; your lax laws will easily let them slip right in amongst you, and of course your country would be the most desireable place for them to go now, wouldn't it?
Might as well officially let them all in. It will make no difference at all.
if it was small enough of a country we could have the so called revolution in the voting booth.
Again with the Naivety... Voting booths don't elect leaders! They only give the illusion of doing so, to keep existing populations from revolting.
Again, your heart is in the right place but these answers are not going to work simply because the world is a much more evil and twisted place than you seem to believe. I recommend reading more history. We're not the first to seek for these answers.