Of course this will have an impact on a club where there is no sponsor or promoter in it. I can't understand why the spanish government is doing that when we know there are some clubs there that will certainly get the impact. even though if you look at gambling it's not that bad. even in most countries some people make gambling a job but there are still countries that forbid it. maybe with this new regulation there are positive and negative sides so you can't judge a thing. I think it will be a tough job.
Probably to minimize the exposure of those gambling site, especially many young people sees the player advertising such gambling company so its not good for them. Just like in UK now where they are regulating the advertisements about gambling for the purpose of this one, they are just protecting their people. Beside, those clubs can get other sponsorship, gambling sites are not the only option for them.
Yes, they want to protect their young people from seeing the gambling content in the advertisements. If that is about the player advertise something besides gambling, that will surely allow by the government. But the matter is if the young people see so many gambling advertisements, the government is afraid that the young people can get in the wrong way. Maybe the gambling companies need to modify their advertisements for the player so it does not look to expose the gambling but could replace showing their company logos.
I think they still want to protect their young people, this is not the way, when they are young there is no fear of anything, in fact there is a great belief that they are capable of doing whatever, if something is prohibited, naturally they will want to do it jumping all The rules, if they want to protect their young people, the best thing is education, cultivation, it cannot be a taboo subject, it all has to do with making money.
They want to do this like the drug problem, they want to do many things against it, of course drugs are dangerous, they even kill, but I think that advertising in crypto is an exaggeration that they are prohibited, I think that is not the way.
