[Spammer Blacklist] The Shitlist - page 2.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: Bitcoin_Arena on December 04, 2022, 07:26:52 PM

S/He can't help it but just continue shitposting. This is just one of the examples of the many users with the neutral tag.

That's cute, he mentioned SMF 4 times without knowing it: Powered by SMF!
The real problem is of course the 5 people responding to that BS, instead of clicking Ignore (which I just did). And of course the campaigns that pay for his spam, despite the clear warning on his profile.

Bitcoin_Arena

copper member

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1771

฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.

I've got to appreciate what @actmyname back then. His effort may have left a number of members unhappy, but his judgement was spot on. Now look at this chap's post almost two years later;

Quote from: gantez on December 04, 2022, 11:25:38 AM

I have seen that Samuel Bankman-Fried is getting the hype for himself after scamming follow bitcoiners, forum members who keep their coins in FTZ exchange. His name is abbreviated as SBF with his first initials in many thread here writing about him. At first I can't follow up to the reading because SBF was used and I thought one of the crypto abbreviated words like FUD, FOMO. In the curiosity I have I decided to search SMF in my browser and I saw different meaning and not Samuel Banksman-Fried. I went back to the thread to do but a careful reading and now understood the full name/meaning as Samuel Bankman-Fried. Now I go back to my browser to type SMF and it now appear as Samuel Bankman-Fried and other meaning of SMF

I think we are making a scammer who took the hard work of traders feel good and popular with SMF that is everywhere in the forum.

S/He can't help it but just continue shitposting. This is just one of the examples of the many users with the neutral tag.

Respect to you "ser"

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2504

Spear the bees

I don't know about you, but most of the time these large sets of qualifying (i.e. good) reports come from users' post histories. Assuming my feedback's number comes from a single session and is not a cumulative sum, that's 6 pages of consecutive spam. At the very least, there would be 20 posts in a row with sufficiently-low average quality to which I would decide to go through your post history.

Long posts are not necessarily indicative of quality, but the reason that I have so many spammers with short posts and one/two-liners on my list is because low-quality posts are generally short. This is especially the case where signature spammers or bounty hunters compete for either (expected) low or unknown (i.e. new alt) rewards - with such a low-margin market, the only way to be profitable is to either spam through multiple accounts and campaigns or to have a low enough cost of living to where posting is considered a "good job". If only they could do the good job in the first place.

There is no problem with users earning money - look at the name of the forum. However, if you think that I have a problem with you (personally or otherwise), then perhaps you should take some time to enjoy the universe instead of your own headspace. The reason you land on this list is because I have confirmed with both my own eyes and the moderation team (via reports) that you are a spammer. In fact, regardless of the reporter, your posts would have likely been deleted!

I could abstain from writing neutral feedback on your trust page, and continue reporting your posts until scores of posts are deleted. Others could do the same. In fact, we are all free to report each others posts should we deem them unnecessary, spam, or redundant: at the end of the day, it's a private forum handled by moderation staff and a (maybe)nevolent dictator. The reason that threads grow to snowballing messes of the same five semi-coherent thoughts all quoting one another in agreement and padded faux-additions of detail is because these posts are ignored. The saturation of spam has grown to such a degree that users no longer see reporting as worthwhile and let spammers get away with posting swathes of bullshit.

So when I go through the typical spam boards and look at people like you posting on multiple threads on page 10+ with some generic reply and I see that your post history continues on with the same pace, or I see that you post nothing but one and two-liners... should I simply say, the forum will be fine fermenting in the septic tank?

Alert31

member

Activity: 1041

Merit: 25

Trident Protocol | Simple «buy-hold-earn» system!

Quote from: examplens on February 15, 2022, 05:18:38 PM

Quote from: Alert31 on February 15, 2022, 04:53:36 PM

All I want is to join those campaign which I thought it can help feeding my childrens even earning a little.

feeding children is certainly a completely legitimate reason to spam and write nonsense. it's really amazing how others don't understand that.

Quote from: Alert31 on February 15, 2022, 04:53:36 PM

but what about others who just trying to make the best post yet still not enough and tag as spammer?

you don't seem to be that person. Every 7th your post is deleted by moderators due to spam and that is the main reason why you are in this spammer group.

Quote from: Alert31 on February 15, 2022, 04:53:36 PM

Did you consider others or this forum is just for all high ranks with degree holder that can post a very long, informative and quality post all the time? Maybe yes!!!

A "very long" post does not mean immediately that this post is useful.
I would advise you to dedicate a little more to your posts and to realistically accept whether they have any significance to anyone. You had only one post in the last 120 days which earned merit.

Nonesense?! Answering the post of others is nonesense? Then why you allow others to make a starting post which is easy and nonesense?

Also, only few people here knows how to appreciate post and give merit. I'm not after the merit that's why you see I'm still a member because I can't post like you do. All I know is just to answered based on what the starting post. But sadly only those with higher degree can post a very long, informative messages which can pass to the standard of higher ranks here.

Alert31

member

Activity: 1041

Merit: 25

Trident Protocol | Simple «buy-hold-earn» system!

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on February 15, 2022, 12:39:28 PM

Quote from: Alert31 on February 15, 2022, 08:11:42 AM

Thank you for including me in your list. I know I'm not as good and smart as you but do you really know why I'm her after I learned about crypto because I am mother of five children and I think I can earn through this forum to support my kids. Maybe this not really the place for me because I am not good in posting or making topics here, and I'm not fluent in english and for you I am just spamming in purpose. I tried my best to answer the post of others but I think it's not enough. I'm sorry to all the moderators and knowledgeable individuals here in bitcointalk.

Did you see a neutral tag just today? Almost a year has passed. Or are you filling up your weekly quota? You are unhappy with the tag left for you, but you probably forgot that you once had a negative tag from Pharmacist , and I also caught you cheating.
Do you tell everyone your tearful story about five children? But I only see five of your accounts, does this mean that the children also work with you (humor)

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on August 19, 2020, 01:27:09 AM

5 Accounts Connected:
Abuse of merit.

1. Kez1817
2. Nhor1011
3. Alert31
4. Blackrain13
5. Ehrakeziah

Honestly, you should be more modest.

Anyway, i never forgot that you removed a negative trust you have given to me after you wrongly accused me of cheating and giving you a positive trust in return. Still thank you because my family survived the pandemic through the small amount I earned in signature. But now, I think joining a campaign is over.

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 3098

Quote from: Alert31 on February 15, 2022, 04:53:36 PM

All I want is to join those campaign which I thought it can help feeding my childrens even earning a little.

feeding children is certainly a completely legitimate reason to spam and write nonsense. it's really amazing how others don't understand that.

Quote from: Alert31 on February 15, 2022, 04:53:36 PM

but what about others who just trying to make the best post yet still not enough and tag as spammer?

you don't seem to be that person. Every 7th your post is deleted by moderators due to spam and that is the main reason why you are in this spammer group.

Quote from: Alert31 on February 15, 2022, 04:53:36 PM

Did you consider others or this forum is just for all high ranks with degree holder that can post a very long, informative and quality post all the time? Maybe yes!!!

A "very long" post does not mean immediately that this post is useful.
I would advise you to dedicate a little more to your posts and to realistically accept whether they have any significance to anyone. You had only one post in the last 120 days which earned merit.

Alert31

member

Activity: 1041

Merit: 25

Trident Protocol | Simple «buy-hold-earn» system!

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on February 15, 2022, 12:39:28 PM

Quote from: Alert31 on February 15, 2022, 08:11:42 AM

Thank you for including me in your list. I know I'm not as good and smart as you but do you really know why I'm her after I learned about crypto because I am mother of five children and I think I can earn through this forum to support my kids. Maybe this not really the place for me because I am not good in posting or making topics here, and I'm not fluent in english and for you I am just spamming in purpose. I tried my best to answer the post of others but I think it's not enough. I'm sorry to all the moderators and knowledgeable individuals here in bitcointalk.

Did you see a neutral tag just today? Almost a year has passed. Or are you filling up your weekly quota? You are unhappy with the tag left for you, but you probably forgot that you once had a negative tag from Pharmacist , and I also caught you cheating.
Do you tell everyone your tearful story about five children? But I only see five of your accounts, does this mean that the children also work with you (humor)

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on August 19, 2020, 01:27:09 AM

5 Accounts Connected:
Abuse of merit.

1. Kez1817
2. Nhor1011
3. Alert31
4. Blackrain13
5. Ehrakeziah

Honestly, you should be more modest.

Cheating?! Are you sure?! Fyi I'll never joined any campaign using alt accounts. The time you tag me because I use my alt accout in fb campaign while the other is just in signature. How did you say that I am cheating? That 5 account you mentioned is not all mine because the 2 belongs to my husband when he tried to join also but unfortunately leave this forum. And don't worry I will also leave this forum for your happiness and the others. Who do think will become happy tagging negatively. I'm not as smart and talented as you and others who have high rank here. All I want is to join those campaign which I thought it can help feeding my childrens even earning a little. Sometimes others higher rank like you which is knowledgeable enough can easily judge the persons here in bitcointalk. Maybe all of you are rich people and earn a lot with enough talent and knowledge, but what about others who just trying to make the best post yet still not enough and tag as spammer? Did you consider others or this forum is just for all high ranks with degree holder that can post a very long, informative and quality post all the time? Maybe yes!!!

lovesmayfamilis

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 4216

✿♥‿♥✿

Quote from: Alert31 on February 15, 2022, 08:11:42 AM

Thank you for including me in your list. I know I'm not as good and smart as you but do you really know why I'm her after I learned about crypto because I am mother of five children and I think I can earn through this forum to support my kids. Maybe this not really the place for me because I am not good in posting or making topics here, and I'm not fluent in english and for you I am just spamming in purpose. I tried my best to answer the post of others but I think it's not enough. I'm sorry to all the moderators and knowledgeable individuals here in bitcointalk.

Did you see a neutral tag just today? Almost a year has passed. Or are you filling up your weekly quota? You are unhappy with the tag left for you, but you probably forgot that you once had a negative tag from Pharmacist , and I also caught you cheating.
Do you tell everyone your tearful story about five children? But I only see five of your accounts, does this mean that the children also work with you (humor)

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on August 19, 2020, 01:27:09 AM

5 Accounts Connected:
Abuse of merit.

1. Kez1817
2. Nhor1011
3. Alert31
4. Blackrain13
5. Ehrakeziah

Honestly, you should be more modest.

Alert31

member

Activity: 1041

Merit: 25

Trident Protocol | Simple «buy-hold-earn» system!

Quote from: actmyname on August 29, 2021, 04:20:56 AM

Disappointing yet unsurprising.

Code:

271| Cappex
231| samcrypto
159| Alucard1
158| plr
158| ibuddy122505
147| makishart
145| Google+
140| mdzahed134
135| zaim7413
134| ololajulo
133| royalfestus
129| gaston castano
120| naikturun
119| nebuch
118| rahmatullah9305
117| GreenStox
113| martina14
111| cvasy
103| Surrapatt
100| Nhor1011
99 | riso2015
99 | ringgo96
98 | daenarys_stormborn
96 | meldrio1
94 | tarable
90 | jacafbiz
87 | tazmantasik
86 | Tellek Garing
86 | marcous
85 | Cadaver20
83 | Bay_Harbour_Butcher
80 | ZaraCB
80 | Ten98
80 | raji1995naya
80 | pelumi20
80 | iamsange
80 | abralzain17
79 | Rana590
77 | Farma
75 | kanayaTabitha
72 | Xxmodded
71 | celot
70 | pieppiep
69 | X-ray
64 | takngantuk
62 | Zedpastin
62 | Twinscoin2017
60 | Smitt
60 | pandanaran
60 | MonaLeeTracy
60 | Kezacky
60 | cafee_orange
59 | awakpane
58 | watergold
58 | MUG1WARA
58 | fia_naila
58 | carrie_white
57 | Bagaji
54 | Wildwest
53 | wack slacker
51 | XCANA

Total reports: 6903
Total users: 105
Average reports/user: 65.74
Worst offender: Cappex

Users with less than 50 are cut off from the list.

Thank you for including me in your list. I know I'm not as good and smart as you but do you really know why I'm her after I learned about crypto because I am mother of five children and I think I can earn through this forum to support my kids. Maybe this not really the place for me because I am not good in posting or making topics here, and I'm not fluent in english and for you I am just spamming in purpose. I tried my best to answer the post of others but I think it's not enough. I'm sorry to all the moderators and knowledgeable individuals here in bitcointalk.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2504

Spear the bees

Disappointing yet unsurprising.

Code:

271| Cappex
231| samcrypto
159| Alucard1
158| plr
158| ibuddy122505
147| makishart
145| Google+
140| mdzahed134
135| zaim7413
134| ololajulo
133| royalfestus
129| gaston castano
120| naikturun
119| nebuch
118| rahmatullah9305
117| GreenStox
113| martina14
111| cvasy
103| Surrapatt
100| Nhor1011
99 | riso2015
99 | ringgo96
98 | daenarys_stormborn
96 | meldrio1
94 | tarable
90 | jacafbiz
87 | tazmantasik
86 | Tellek Garing
86 | marcous
85 | Cadaver20
83 | Bay_Harbour_Butcher
80 | ZaraCB
80 | Ten98
80 | raji1995naya
80 | pelumi20
80 | iamsange
80 | abralzain17
79 | Rana590
77 | Farma
75 | kanayaTabitha
72 | Xxmodded
71 | celot
70 | pieppiep
69 | X-ray
64 | takngantuk
62 | Zedpastin
62 | Twinscoin2017
60 | Smitt
60 | pandanaran
60 | MonaLeeTracy
60 | Kezacky
60 | cafee_orange
59 | awakpane
58 | watergold
58 | MUG1WARA
58 | fia_naila
58 | carrie_white
57 | Bagaji
54 | Wildwest
53 | wack slacker
51 | XCANA

Total reports: 6903
Total users: 105
Average reports/user: 65.74
Worst offender: Cappex

Users with less than 50 are cut off from the list.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2504

Spear the bees

Quote from: Maestro75 on July 22, 2021, 07:29:00 AM

The haste at which several of my posts were deleted in one day was glaring that the posts were never read. But after opening that thread I discovered that those who did what they did were not going to apologize. I moved on. I do not know why @actmyname feels that his standard is the standard everyone should stick to or adopt.

Do not project your indignity upon others. I have already stated previously: these posts are reported to moderators which make final call. Considering I primarily report particularly bad-quality posters in the altcoin sections, this leads to a high volume of post deletion.

Something I still don't understand is why you assume the posts are deleted at the same time that the messages reach your inbox: what is the probability that moderators will simply accept all reports of mine as "good" without having read the content? If you are assuming that moderators are simply blindly deleting posts, then I would direct you toward the breakdown of stats:

82572 good, 1382 bad, 7452 unhandled

-- meaning, at least 10% of posts were left alone, which would be strange if they simply didn't give a shit.

Get over yourself. You're responding to a 3 month-old reply, and for what?

Don't be mad at me if anyone could have reported your posts instead and had the exact same result.

Maestro75

sr. member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 328

Quote from: zonefloor on April 24, 2021, 11:28:56 AM

180-odd comments were deleted within 10 seconds. So are these moderators now android? It will review my posts in 10 seconds. Who are you and with what right do you add me to the list you set in your own style?

I was caught in a similar situation like yours and I opened a thread on that here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56649695. The haste at which several of my posts were deleted in one day was glaring that the posts were never read. But after opening that thread I discovered that those who did what they did were not going to apologize. I moved on. I do not know why @actmyname feels that his standard is the standard everyone should stick to or adopt. I feel some members of the forum even get bullied by him and they keep mute. I have read a lot of his positions on things and discovered that he is often emotional about things and not objective with the decisions he takes. I wish him luck in his pursuit of whatever makes him happy but makes others sad. If actmyname was theymos, am sure we all would be under feudalism by now.

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2506

Merit: 1710

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: actmyname on July 19, 2021, 10:50:50 AM

I would heavily weigh neutral feedback against the user's post volume in general and their quality after the fact. Most of the users were among the worst of the spammers, having posted consecutive pages worth of one-liners or generic responses. However, anything that is light enough for neutral feedback should not be juxtaposed with a distrust. I don't distrust judgment due to poor post quality - we have done business across languages for centuries - therefore the neutral feedback is sufficient.

Moreover, distrusting a highly active spammer is not likely to have any tangible effects: what percentage of these users participate in enough trades for a distrust to make a difference? Unlike a negative feedback (which is harsher than distrust and should certainly not be used here) which has a visual indicator, a user would have simply no idea that you distrusted them unless they investigated.

I would always hesitate in the elevation of punishment against others. It is a case of what is necessary: why increase restitution in the case of no change?

Point taken, thank you. As soon as I am able to add them to my ignore list (using the Ignore user options link) I will do it.

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on July 19, 2021, 10:55:42 AM

You can do with your trust list whatever you like, of course, but even if you don't like shitposters/spammers (and I'm with you there), excluding a member from your trust list is supposed to reflect that member's bad judgement in leaving trust feedback. And with the members in the list from actmyname, I bet you that most of them haven't even left a single feedback for anyone since they're too busy spamming the forum with garbage.

I doubt you're going to hurt any of those members' reputations, but the point is that adding them to your ignore list would probably have been a better thing to do--but again, it's your choice and I'm certainly not going to vehemently protest the exclusion of some proven shitposters from your personal trust list.

You are probably right, the vast majority or all of them have not left feedback or even participated in feedback abuse because they are bust posting spam.

Thank you for the tip, I will add them to my ignore list but at the moment the Ignore user options link does not open the page for me to copy and paste the users in to the text box. I will keep trying from time to time, hopefully I will catch it at a time the page opens.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 6706

Proudly Cycling Merits for Foxpup

Quote from: JollyGood on July 19, 2021, 10:40:58 AM

If they have 50+ good reports to show they are trolls, part of an account farm or signature spammers then I do not trust them.

You can do with your trust list whatever you like, of course, but even if you don't like shitposters/spammers (and I'm with you there), excluding a member from your trust list is supposed to reflect that member's bad judgement in leaving trust feedback. And with the members in the list from actmyname, I bet you that most of them haven't even left a single feedback for anyone since they're too busy spamming the forum with garbage.

I doubt you're going to hurt any of those members' reputations, but the point is that adding them to your ignore list would probably have been a better thing to do--but again, it's your choice and I'm certainly not going to vehemently protest the exclusion of some proven shitposters from your personal trust list.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2504

Spear the bees

Quote from: JollyGood on July 19, 2021, 10:40:58 AM

I agree some of them can leave accurate feedback but actmyname mentioned above the list: "The following users have 50+ good reports against them"

If they have 50+ good reports to show they are trolls, part of an account farm or signature spammers then I do not trust them. I tried adding them to my ignore list but that page does not open and I think ignoring them one by one with clicks is out of the question because of the time it would take.

Quote from: LoyceV on July 19, 2021, 05:56:00 AM

Quote from: JollyGood on July 19, 2021, 05:18:03 AM

Thank you actmyname, I have added the whole of your list to my distrust list.

Why?
Having posts deleted doesn't mean some of them can't leave accurate feedback. I'd say your Ignore list is a better place if you believe their posts aren't worth reading.

I would heavily weigh neutral feedback against the user's post volume in general and their quality after the fact. Most of the users were among the worst of the spammers, having posted consecutive pages worth of one-liners or generic responses. However, anything that is light enough for neutral feedback should not be juxtaposed with a distrust. I don't distrust judgment due to poor post quality - we have done business across languages for centuries - therefore the neutral feedback is sufficient.

Moreover, distrusting a highly active spammer is not likely to have any tangible effects: what percentage of these users participate in enough trades for a distrust to make a difference? Unlike a negative feedback (which is harsher than distrust and should certainly not be used here) which has a visual indicator, a user would have simply no idea that you distrusted them unless they investigated.

I would always hesitate in the elevation of punishment against others. It is a case of what is necessary: why increase restitution in the case of no change?

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2506

Merit: 1710

Top Crypto Casino

I agree some of them can leave accurate feedback but actmyname mentioned above the list: "The following users have 50+ good reports against them"

If they have 50+ good reports to show they are trolls, part of an account farm or signature spammers then I do not trust them. I tried adding them to my ignore list but that page does not open and I think ignoring them one by one with clicks is out of the question because of the time it would take.

Quote from: LoyceV on July 19, 2021, 05:56:00 AM

Quote from: JollyGood on July 19, 2021, 05:18:03 AM

Thank you actmyname, I have added the whole of your list to my distrust list.

Why?
Having posts deleted doesn't mean some of them can't leave accurate feedback. I'd say your Ignore list is a better place if you believe their posts aren't worth reading.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: JollyGood on July 19, 2021, 05:18:03 AM

Thank you actmyname, I have added the whole of your list to my distrust list.

Why?
Having posts deleted doesn't mean some of them can't leave accurate feedback. I'd say your Ignore list is a better place if you believe their posts aren't worth reading.

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2506

Merit: 1710

Top Crypto Casino

Thank you actmyname, I have added the whole of your list to my distrust list. I am not sure how many were already added to my distrust list beforehand but I added them all.

Code:

~$anounimus$
~2Kool4Skewl
~acdc
~Adreman23
~Adriano2010
~ahmia39
~ajeef
~AjithBtc
~ajqjjj
~akmal1984
~Alert31
~alian17
~aliceHortrex
~alisonwonder
~alrose
~amonymous
~andrearz
~andriarto
~Anonylz
~ansarose1
~Apes
~ardentvolcanoes
~arifteguhr
~arimamib
~Astvile
~atjiat
~auchit
~automaticmoney
~avarnet
~awakpane
~Ayiranorea
~Babylon
~baeva2
~Bagaji
~bandungan
~barota
~Becky666
~bering
~Best Dreams
~biangkerok
~BigBos
~bigcash2011
~bison
~bitbunnny
~Bitcoin Seller
~bitcoin31
~bitcoinisbest
~BitcoinPanther
~bitcoinposts
~bitcoinst
~Bitfling
~bitpotter
~bleachX
~blockchainwriters
~bobby1776
~bobyhodob
~Bosx1ne
~breathlessz
~Btc_1856
~btccoffee
~Burogh
~Bustart
~cahbagus555
~calandra78
~CaptainKid
~carter34
~celot
~cergfalcone
~Cherylstar86
~Cianix
~clint25n
~coin_1122
~coingrowth
~Congyang
~crazy-pilot
~cribusen
~crisanto01
~Crypto5060
~cryptoknightt
~CryptoLogo
~cunguks
~cute nmp
~cvasy
~cytpoway121
~DainSLane
~daniahya
~DarkIT
~Darktongue
~Davian144
~DeadCoin
~DeathProxy
~Desscount
~desticy
~devil2man
~devis9990i
~Dewi Aries
~Dhoe
~Dijital Para
~Distinctin
~djselery
~dobolspeed3
~DonFacundo
~duuuuude
~Duzter
~EastSound
~Ejanend
~emberbekas
~EmmaGod
~ethereumhunter
~fabiola!
~Falconer
~farlack
~Farma
~fauzan Ichsan
~Finestream
~FlamingFingers
~FlightyPouch
~FloridaKid
~flyer88
~fortunecrypto
~Fredomago
~fuer44
~gantez
~Garrygold
~gaston castano
~GatotKaca
~Genemind
~goaldigger
~Godday
~Google+
~Gozie51
~grandpix
~GreenStox
~guydin
~gwdf1
~gweedo
~H1N1
~HabiebRiziq
~hahay
~haidil
~Henrobakkara
~HK88
~horrifiedx1
~HyunBin
~iamzill
~ice098
~ice18
~Iceblast
~ife2020
~ILScoin
~iMark
~immortal4now
~imteaz
~inanilujimi
~Indrawan77
~ipanks
~IParn
~Irdina
~Irvinn
~Irviyandi
~islafilipina
~IvugeoEvolutionCoin
~iyah adrian
~Iykecollins
~jackblacksparrow
~jake zyrus
~jaocoincrypto18
~JCviggen
~jhonjhon
~jigzaheedcoin
~Jocuserious
~John Kreese
~joshy23
~Jpti
~JRoa
~judeafante
~Karmakid
~Kasabus
~kateycoin
~Kay94
~kayvie
~kesmex
~Kevondo
~Kez1817
~killerfrost
~kingzpro
~kkaroul4
~Klausi
~Kocret02
~kodtycoon
~kramat
~krayzie32
~Krislaw
~Lantind
~laredo7mm
~leatutz
~leetcoiner
~Lexurdania
~litepool.ru
~lobo13hf
~localcrypto
~logicgate
~lousie9
~LUCKMCFLY
~luckyflop
~Ludmilla_rose1995
~Luqman
~m0Ray
~Maamejane
~Maestro75
~Mahmudmach
~Malam90
~mamahdedeh
~martina14
~mdzahed134
~meldrio1
~memed97
~mersal
~Meta anggraini
~MFahad
~micalith
~michellee
~miklesm
~miningguru
~mirawantirinjana
~MisterLangley
~mitchr4
~mnporter2001
~Moiyah
~molsewid
~MonaLeeTracy
~monineklutak
~moynul2050
~Mr. Ar_Mongi
~Mr.Noda
~mrkavasaki
~Muzika
~n0ne
~naikturun
~Negotiation
~ngocdhbk2
~Nhor1011
~NoG-NoG
~Noilee
~nreal
~nur rochid
~Obito
~Oceat
~Oneandpure
~ongkok87
~onrise
~OrangeII
~palle11
~Pamadar
~Panchum
~pandanaran
~pantek talacuik
~partysaurus
~Peashooter
~pelumi20
~perla
~peterpanda
~Pffrt
~Phantomberry
~pilosopotasyo
~Pithaxz
~playboy654
~poldanmig
~Pom_bensin
~preikaler
~princeyeboah
~prof7bit
~Prompyboo
~Psychee
~pungopete468
~qazgroup
~quality.crypto
~r_delossa
~rachman mahesa
~radjie
~Rafiqul
~Rahman11
~rahmathidayat93
~rahmatullah9305
~Rana590
~Ranly123
~rathaha10
~reality18
~reliable
~rendravolt
~rhodelmabanal
~rich93
~ringgo96
~riso2015
~rizkyalhabsy
~rmhuntley
~romanij
~RondoAnyar
~royalfestus
~Rufsilf
~S4VV4S
~saaayyyeeel
~Sadlife
~SaidNurs
~samcrypto
~sammyp
~sangjoewara
~SanZoldyck
~SaRmY
~SaveOurSea
~secretgirl
~Seeker#9
~semobo
~sempak
~sentoy
~seramania
~shanghai
~shiming
~ShowOff
~silverleafy
~sirminesalot
~SistaFista
~sniveel
~Starfranko
~StartupAnalyst
~strunberg
~Subbir
~Surrapatt
~swordking
~syamster
~tarable
~TelolettOm
~Tessnik
~tetyulfania
~Thanasis
~TheClownSong
~TheICE007
~thienlonghue
~thirdlight
~Thomas-s
~tiang_tower
~TIDOVEE
~tippytoes
~toast
~TopT3ns
~trauchot
~TrevorS
~trickyriky
~tungaqhd
~Tungsten-1
~Ucy
~udidrone
~umbara ardian
~usekevin
~Vaculin
~Vinaa77
~Viscore
~Vishnu.Reang
~Vit83
~wahyu wida
~Wahyuihib
~Wawa2013
~Wellyan
~whirlcoin
~White Christmas
~wildey
~Wildwest
~Willitivity
~Xampeuu
~XCANA
~xmonkeyx
~xSkylarx
~xZork
~yurez
~yvesp110
~zaim7413
~zhekinsp
~zidanw
~znation
~zonefloor

savetheFORUM

full member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 140

Wanted to give some merit to the thread since a long time and today only I got some so I quickly came here.

The work you do for this forum is almost inhuman because you are catching so many spammers and even have a reason to call them such, please continue doing the excellent work you do.

Quote from: zonefloor on April 24, 2021, 11:28:56 AM

180-odd comments were deleted within 10 seconds. So are these moderators now android? It will review my posts in 10 seconds. Who are you and with what right do you add me to the list you set in your own style?

Because your posts went unnoticed due to the lack of moderators and the amount of spam the forum watches every day. But once they were reported, the moderators deleted them. Instead of arguing your case without any ground, just try and improve your posting habits.

Quote from: zonefloor on April 24, 2021, 11:28:56 AM

You complain about people's posts and cause their comments to be deleted. Then you add them to your spam list. You are one of the main spammers and someone who disrespects people's rights.

He is not taking away any rights from you. If you fee he is spamming you can report his posts and rest assured moderators don't discriminate between ranks when deleting posts from any ranked member, whether it's made by a newbie or even made by Theymos himself.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2504

Spear the bees

Quote from: zonefloor on April 24, 2021, 11:28:56 AM

180-odd comments were deleted within 10 seconds. So are these moderators now android? It will review my posts in 10 seconds. Who are you and with what right do you add me to the list you set in your own style?

Faced with a questionable act, instead of looking for alternative explanations, the most logical proceeding was to assign blame to others and to strengthen your pre-established conclusion.

Is it possible that the moderators review the reports first, and then delete them? Is it possible that you are posting on a non-public platform that has rules, enforced at the discretion of the post-deleting moderators?

Projection is not the way to go if you're getting posts deleted for spam. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Topic: [Spammer Blacklist] The Shitlist - page 2. (Read 6898 times)