- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.
I am very much agree to what vaculin stated .
Topic: [Spammer Blacklist] The Shitlist - page 4. (Read 7144 times)
Kudos to @actmyname to help the forum identify the worst spammer but whether it is negative, positive or neutral rating the guideline theymos gave regarding rating is very simple and clear.
I am very much agree to what vaculin stated .
I am very much agree to what vaculin stated .
It's not the first time you were tagged for being a spammer. I'm sorry that I wasn't fast enough: I should have added these ratings as soon as I started reporting you.
If neutral feedback bothers you that much then you should consider how you ever got to the point where you thought, "let me write 10 pages of consecutive spam posts". Three pages into your post history, you can start to see the same level quality as the posts I typically report. If you want to say that you've changed, then that's okay, but you haven't been doing much posting since those replies were deleted. How am I supposed to know that all of a sudden, you are now able to write incredible responses with renewed vigor?
For the record, almost all of the users who have triple-digit good reports had entire pages of posts reported: that's how much spam they were generating alone. I can understand that you want to "change" but would you have done so yourself, had I not reported those posts?
I usually remember the usernames of the worst spammers out there. For some reason, I don't remember yours, so I must have done the bulk of the reporting in just a few days or even a single day. What does that say about the quality I saw?
If neutral feedback bothers you that much then you should consider how you ever got to the point where you thought, "let me write 10 pages of consecutive spam posts". Three pages into your post history, you can start to see the same level quality as the posts I typically report. If you want to say that you've changed, then that's okay, but you haven't been doing much posting since those replies were deleted. How am I supposed to know that all of a sudden, you are now able to write incredible responses with renewed vigor?
For the record, almost all of the users who have triple-digit good reports had entire pages of posts reported: that's how much spam they were generating alone. I can understand that you want to "change" but would you have done so yourself, had I not reported those posts?
I usually remember the usernames of the worst spammers out there. For some reason, I don't remember yours, so I must have done the bulk of the reporting in just a few days or even a single day. What does that say about the quality I saw?
Well I can accept the reasons you give. Indeed I made a stupid mistake in the past and now get it again. The first Neutral Tag really really influences the way someone views my post, the moderators mostly delete my posts even though I think it is still in standard and doesn't spam. Even though I'm not as bad as people think and there are still many users who are more worsen than me maybe they are luckier than me. I've finished in this thread. Thank you for the explanation
Tagging someone if it's only based on old bpip recordings without comparing the actual activity is still unacceptable.
Also people can change.
Also people can change.
Sorry, but what actual activity?
You are Sr. Member rank member with only five earned merits. As per current standards, you would need at least 10 merits to be just a Member rank.
So please tell us, what actual activity?
Okay. I already know it.
Tagging someone if it's only based on old bpip recordings without comparing the actual activity is still unacceptable.
Also people can change.
It's not the first time you were tagged for being a spammer. I'm sorry that I wasn't fast enough: I should have added these ratings as soon as I started reporting you.Tagging someone if it's only based on old bpip recordings without comparing the actual activity is still unacceptable.
Also people can change.
If neutral feedback bothers you that much then you should consider how you ever got to the point where you thought, "let me write 10 pages of consecutive spam posts". Three pages into your post history, you can start to see the same level quality as the posts I typically report. If you want to say that you've changed, then that's okay, but you haven't been doing much posting since those replies were deleted. How am I supposed to know that all of a sudden, you are now able to write incredible responses with renewed vigor?
For the record, almost all of the users who have triple-digit good reports had entire pages of posts reported: that's how much spam they were generating alone. I can understand that you want to "change" but would you have done so yourself, had I not reported those posts?
I usually remember the usernames of the worst spammers out there. For some reason, I don't remember yours, so I must have done the bulk of the reporting in just a few days or even a single day. What does that say about the quality I saw?
Okay. I already know it.
Tagging someone if it's only based on old bpip recordings without comparing the actual activity is still unacceptable.
Also people can change.
Tagging someone if it's only based on old bpip recordings without comparing the actual activity is still unacceptable.
Also people can change.
Hi! I didn't know I am part of the top 1000 spammer until actmyname tag me. I have been on and off the forum but I see this as a positive act, at least in my POV. this enable us (those on the list) at least to improve ourselves. This sure is a tiring job since the ranking constantly change 
. I hope actmyname's tag is kept up to date as to not negatively affect those who are trying to improve their posting quality. Don't get butthurt because we are tagged, instead let us use this as motivation to improve our posting quality.
. I hope actmyname's tag is kept up to date as to not negatively affect those who are trying to improve their posting quality. Don't get butthurt because we are tagged, instead let us use this as motivation to improve our posting quality. Well. If tagging account based on deleted posts in the past, I don't think that's objective. Because currently I'm trying to improve my posts quality and not posting unnecessary lately.
Even though it's just a neutral tag. As a bitcointalk member I am really disappointed to be tagged because of my error that occurred in the past, I'm just an easy target if it sort.
Did you know that I reported all of those deleted posts?Even though it's just a neutral tag. As a bitcointalk member I am really disappointed to be tagged because of my error that occurred in the past, I'm just an easy target if it sort.
Here, look! There you are!
I wonder why Im on the list, while I only made 20 posts in last 4 months. what kind spammer standards are used.
I bet you are a good person for this forum, and want to make this forum even better.
but if what you do is wrong you will only make this forum worse.
do a review on my account and check whether what you do is right.
I bet you are a good person for this forum, and want to make this forum even better.
but if what you do is wrong you will only make this forum worse.
do a review on my account and check whether what you do is right.
Due to BPIP stats, you have 225 posts deleted by moderators. Every 6th post of yours is marked as spam and deleted because of it. For example, @actmyname made 346 posts while one deleted.
I guess if you can improve this score, you will probably be removed from this list.
Well. If tagging account based on deleted posts in the past, I don't think that's objective. Because currently I'm trying to improve my posts quality and not posting unnecessary lately.
Even though it's just a neutral tag. As a bitcointalk member I am really disappointed to be tagged because of my error that occurred in the past, I'm just an easy target if it sort.
I wonder why Im on the list, while I only made 20 posts in last 4 months. what kind spammer standards are used.
I bet you are a good person for this forum, and want to make this forum even better.
but if what you do is wrong you will only make this forum worse.
do a review on my account and check whether what you do is right.
I bet you are a good person for this forum, and want to make this forum even better.
but if what you do is wrong you will only make this forum worse.
do a review on my account and check whether what you do is right.
Due to BPIP stats, you have 225 posts deleted by moderators. Every 6th post of yours is marked as spam and deleted because of it. For example, @actmyname made 346 posts while one deleted.
I guess if you can improve this score, you will probably be removed from this list.
I wonder why Im on the list, while I only made 20 posts in last 4 months. what kind spammer standards are used.
I bet you are a good person for this forum, and want to make this forum even better.
but if what you do is wrong you will only make this forum worse.
do a review on my account and check whether what you do is right.
I bet you are a good person for this forum, and want to make this forum even better.
but if what you do is wrong you will only make this forum worse.
do a review on my account and check whether what you do is right.
Can't figure out a good format to deliver the content on the forum directly.
For transparency's sake, here are exactly 23000 reports from 2019's reports with the dates stripped - if someone wants me to provide the list with the attached times for further credibility I can do so, but this drops the file size by 50% - I've already provided a short snippet of reports with dates so I don't think it's necessary.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bPPBarEeNdvNhJH9hb24Y3Kp6Xeo6Z_m/view
Use whatever favorite text editor you like to traverse the wave of replies.
For transparency's sake, here are exactly 23000 reports from 2019's reports with the dates stripped - if someone wants me to provide the list with the attached times for further credibility I can do so, but this drops the file size by 50% - I've already provided a short snippet of reports with dates so I don't think it's necessary.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bPPBarEeNdvNhJH9hb24Y3Kp6Xeo6Z_m/view
Use whatever favorite text editor you like to traverse the wave of replies.
I'm not against on this one because I cannot deny myself to be on the list of "Most Post/Topics deleted by Moderators", I got banned for a week because of this one and I think I've already learned my lesson.
This feedback hurt me a little because of being called as a worst spammer of all time, but I still respect actmyname.
Only if I can do something about this one, I'll keep on working and improving myself until i made myself out of that list (even if it seems impossible).
This feedback hurt me a little because of being called as a worst spammer of all time, but I still respect actmyname.
Only if I can do something about this one, I'll keep on working and improving myself until i made myself out of that list (even if it seems impossible).
About the neutral feedback you guys received, I don't think you should be worried or so annoyed about it. I know it could have hurt your feelings a little because it says something about your posting style, but it's just a neutral and not a negative feedback. Usually members here don't even pay attention to neutral feedback that much
Exactly, I don't really care about that neutral feedback because in reality it won't deter me from improving my quality and contribution to forums and users.Was this a slight mistake, or you meant every word you said there?
Right, i mean that is spam busters. Sorry, i have edited now. 
>>>snip<<<
In fact I was really surprised by the feedback I received recently on my profile because I honestly didn't expect it.
About the neutral feedback you guys received, I don't think you should be worried or so annoyed about it. I know it could have hurt your feelings a little because it says something about your posting style, but it's just a neutral and not a negative feedback. Usually members here don't even pay attention to neutral feedback that much
You are one of the best forum spammers who have contributed to forum and kept the forum clean from spammers.
Was this a slight mistake, or you meant every word you said there? I personally reported every one of these users. This is my data and I can vouch for its authenticity. I am using BPIP as a secondary reference. This is why I asked about the pastebin. Since I can't guarantee that the BPIP results are 100% accurate, I am marking the users that I have in my first post.
Well, I can personally understand what you mean and what makes you do this. You are one of the best forum spam busters who have contributed to forum and kept the forum clean from spammers. I'm sure nothing should hold you back if your goal is the best for forums and users. But I also believe that everyone you tag is still likely to change and improve the quality and contribution of forum and users, they should be given a chance. Wouldn't it be too harsh for those who had the desire to change and have already done it if your comments were like this ?
Quote
Part of the Spammer Blacklist: this user has made at least 50 replies that are not up to forum standards. This user is part the top 1000 worst spammers of all time.
Your reasons are not fundamental accusing me of being a spammer. You are only looking for sympathy by reporting and finding fault with people just because you want to join the ChipMixer campaign.
I need proof of where I am spamming?
You're just looking for the sympathy of the ChipMixer manager to be accepted into the bounty campaign. you are a loser
You seek sympathy but use your ignorance. I can reply to report your account to the ChipMixer manager so that you will be removed from the bounty for giving false and slanderous reports. remember what I said
I need proof of where I am spamming?
You're just looking for the sympathy of the ChipMixer manager to be accepted into the bounty campaign. you are a loser
You seek sympathy but use your ignorance. I can reply to report your account to the ChipMixer manager so that you will be removed from the bounty for giving false and slanderous reports. remember what I said
On the contrary, I would say that you are a loser, brother.
Since you have an alternative account with which you participate today in the same subscription company.
And this is already a negative red label.
6. 1 bitcointalk account per person (If you are found to be enrolling alts you and your alt are kicked out with no pay)
Maybe you want to argue and say that this is just a coincidence, registration in one day?
3 Accounts Connected:
iamzill
Iceblast
Congyang
Proof:
User iamzill is registered on Tecracoin sig campaign and has the telegram username @viviartika
iamzill
Iceblast
Congyang
Proof:
User iamzill is registered on Tecracoin sig campaign and has the telegram username @viviartika
Telegram Username: @viviartika
Archivedtelegram username : @viviartika
Archived
If the reason you're tagging a user is simply because some of their posts have been removed by a moderator "50 post or more". I think you should tag everyone on that list. I don't think anyone who is on your personal blacklist should be tagged because maybe that's just your assumption based on data on bpip.org. People can still find out just by looking at the bpip site. Please explain to me if what I said above was something wrong.
I personally reported every one of these users. This is my data and I can vouch for its authenticity. I am using BPIP as a secondary reference. This is why I asked about the pastebin. Since I can't guarantee that the BPIP results are 100% accurate, I am marking the users that I have in my first post.Here, you can check a small sample from 2020:
https://controlc.com/9cb41449
I have my records if anyone is curious.
I don't have to say anything: these users know their posts got deleted when their inbox got those Bitcoin Forum messages. I'm just letting everyone else know.
BPIP will corroborate with the results.
BPIP will corroborate with the results.
Are you going to tag everyone on this list ?
The top 1000 most posts/topics deleted by moderators report lists users by the count of posts and/or topics they've had deleted by the moderators of bitcointalk.org.
If the reason you're tagging a user is simply because some of their posts have been removed by a moderator "50 post or more". I think you should tag everyone on that list. I don't think anyone who is on your personal blacklist should be tagged because maybe that's just your assumption based on data on bpip.org. People can still find out just by looking at the bpip site. Please explain to me if what I said above was something wrong.
I need proof of where I am spamming?
This doesn't need to be said, but if you post on a forum and 25% of your posts are deleted then that doesn't look good for you. I would answer your question with a question.
What's the forum standard for trust feedback? Isn't it out of standard if it's use for a non trust related issue?
I mean, it's the moderators job to evaluate the post, if you keep spamming, you'll be ban, that's it.
What's the forum standard for trust feedback? Isn't it out of standard if it's use for a non trust related issue?
I mean, it's the moderators job to evaluate the post, if you keep spamming, you'll be ban, that's it.
Spam is something completely different compared to feedback trust. User @BTCGOLD presented two negative ratings as spam, which is pointless.
overfilling with spam on daily basis will probably cause a ban.
In your case where you write 12 (not reported as spam) posts, before one spam post, probably you are safe from the potential ban, which will be most reflected your participation in the signature campaign. it will be much harder for you to get into a higher-paid rate campaign managed by a reputed manager. Hhampuz, (in whose campaign you are) certainly is.
Does anyone want a pastebin of the report logs? I'm not sure what the best format to deliver it would be.
I don't think you need to pull all the spam back and review it again, but if a user just wants his case reconsidered, if I remember correctly, @TryNinja on his http://ninjastic.space/ had a great option where deleted posts could be seen. Also, @LoyceV collects such data.
Jump to: