Topic: Spondoolies Spam - page 2. (Read 8119 times)

Hypocrisy or irony can't decide which this is.

Blocked dogie from PM's and ignoring him from this point forward.

It is clearly a shitstorm of his own creation he should have just kept his mouth shut and kept spamming his 40 or so threads instead of shitting on others threads by using the MODERATOR button. How did this thread get out of the TRASH bin dogie explain that? Who suggested it be sent to meta?

Obvious there is lean or bent in how he operates and that should be and has been addressed by companies that feel he may have undue or negative influence on their business. The moderators need to do their job and cull the flood of post to recycle threads back to the first page. At what point does 25 to 40% of the 1st page on the hardware board being dogie  inspired recycling become about his business rather than a community board. Something where he can freely use the board without moderators policing him so that it fills with his clutter. It is not support it is moving into pandering and it really detracts from the important information from others getting through to the community. If I wanted to read what dogie thinks on every brand of miner I would go to his website. We are being held hostage with a constant recycling of dogie support, dogie reviews, dogie getting into arguments with others.

It's a bit much.

Indeed.

That's for you to talk to Bitmain with, I'm dogie not Bitmain. Also, I did not open this thread, I didn't even post in here until the second page.

Dogie, it seems your employer uses the exact same method - sending review units (of course in a much less elegant way ...)

Two review threads already popped up.

Don't you think you should open another meta thread to discuss it ?

You said earlier that your picture-editing effort takes a lot of time. IMHO that's honest, but as long as I personally don't need those pictures, your effort is worthless from my point of view.
The screenshot you posted was part of another effort, this time mine. You did not ask for, and I don't feel like getting you involved in.  


I'm not sure you read all the posts as they were at that time BEFORE you counted them out. All of them are unread .. heh. Why should I be happy and understanding with what I consider "your spam" and you should not be understanding with what you consider mine? Did you ask at least what was it for? And why? .. I don't recall reading anything related, except your biased bitching.

I'll leave it here.

This is exactly why the review threads should not have been locked.

Granted the threads were somewhat repetitive, however they will also serve as a way that potential customers can make an informed decision as to what hardware to purchase as they will get many points of views for this particular model (and hopefully encourage other manufacturers to offer similar 'promotions' in the future so there can be many independent reviews of new hardware.

he doesn't post in every thread! he just post 3times in a row on every page of that thread!!!!!!

i see legendary reviews are closed by guys with respect for the forum and ppl of the forum!
guess who's got 3 ''guides'' on main page atm!!!

Plus he like to post in every other thread - then accuses people of following him......

 Ofcourse he is hurt, he is the most guilty spammer! him and his company!

Atm on hardware page:

12 threads related to bitmain products!
4 threads by bitmain!
3 threads by dogie!!!
2 threads by unhappy bitmain clients!

7 threads related to SPTech products!
2 threads by SPTech!

Where did I say I was not 100% sure? I wouldn't have offered them a 100BTC wager if I wasn't sure their claims were false. Prior to me leaving negative trust I gave them the opportunity to correct their claim.

Either way, you are shifting the goalposts here. I never claimed you should be creating liability for yourself and calling them a scam. You were actively trying to downplay the arguments of those who were calling them a scam. If anything, that would create more liability for yourself in the case that some actually does buy a Zeus and gets scammed than if you'd said nothing.

Tl;dr

[Rather than breaking this down because its the same answer to both parts]. I said you couldn't be absolutely 100% sure, and so it is possible. And so by jumping the gun you're potentially creating so much self liability because you've potentially damaged a perfectly good company's reputation and potentially interfered with their ability to do business. That's your decision and your prerogative, but as I said before just because I'm not willing to create liability as freely as you are isn't a reflection on me.

I'll take that back, you never said their claims were correct. You said that their claim was possible and that there is a good chance it's that cgminer and the chips are behaving in a new way.
Also, I never said you were a scammer. I would say you are biased and financially motivated to protect those companies that are paying your bills, even if it's not something you intentionally set out to do. You've posted several times after Con or I have posted that our claims are conjecture, it might just be a bug, "allegedly falsified", etc. You can say that it is just your concern for fairness, I would call it a whitewashing of what is an intended deception. "It totally looks like a scam and smells like a scam and there's some proof, but let's just see where it goes" is the reason why the securities/services subforums are full of cloudmining ponzies in various stages of collapse.

I'm not saying, and have never said their claims are correct. What I did say is that you're still relying on conjecture that 'its impossible and it can't be done', rather than concrete evidence that they're scamming. And what I did say before is that there are no customers / no customers complaining, so its hard to claim they're scamming when there are no victims.

Either way you're free to rate how you want as its your liability if their speeds turn out to be true, not mine. All I'm asking is that just because you're more willing to chop someone's head off before I am, doesn't make me biased / a suspect / a scammer etc etc.

Its just quote hygiene. You don't combine 7 messages if they're with 7 different people about 7 different topics. If you do, then 7 different people each quote the entire conversation about 7 different topics with 7 other people and before you know it one quote is 40 lines long.

And have you seen the size of the messages I posted above? So long that Guy simply replied "tldr" rather than reading them?

PS, if you want to talk about consecutive posts then in your ratings thread I think you managed 16 in a row, self bumped posts before one of the troll accounts posted about what a terrible person I was. I'm more than happy for you to do whatever you want, I'm just saying don't attempt to call the cops because someone stole a watch when you're walking around with a cliche'd bag of swag.

Again, says the guy with the christmas tree sig 

He is just a disgruntled child, let him get on with it. None of it bears any significance because a lot of his posts are just banner ads. Fuck knows how he has the guile to complain, he's an open book.

Anyone annoyed yet with Dogie's 30 threads? He really seems to like bumping Antminer or Avalon or his own set up guides.

Just today I saw 7 Dogie posts in a row on a single Bitmain thread. Seriously? Does that not constitute spam. Make one post and reference 7 people you are responding to not 7 separate posts holy shit dude.

Even in this thread 3 posts in a row. Be economical.